International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B5. Istanbul 2004
2. THE MAP OF MEXICO
The Map of Mexico 1550, also known as the Uppsala Map
because it is kept at the Uppsala University Library, is one of
the greatest existing historical documents recording the early
colonial history of Mexico. The map is thought to be the work
of the noted Spanish cosmographer Alonso de Santa Cruz. It is
also one of only two known maps that give a fairly accurate
picture of the ancient city of Mexico-Tenochtitlan and its
surrounding regions in the mid 16" century.
The clearly drawn roads over the mountains to other parts of the
country permit us to retrace the routes taken by the Spanish
conquerors. The map also gives information about the
ethnography and the flora and fauna of the region. The
population is shown performing a variety of activities, such as
woodcutting, canoeing, hunting, and fishing. The approximately
150 glyphs on the map, representing human and animal heads,
feet, hands, circles and stars, refer to name places. (Larsson,
2002)
Figure 1. The Map of Mexico
The dimensions of the document are 114 cm lengthwise and 78
cm widthwise. Though no conclusive analysis of the material
properties of the artifact has been done, expert opinion indicates
that the inscriptions may have been painted using pigments on a
surface comprising two sheets parchment joined in the center.
(León-Portilla, 1986) During the years the parchment has
deformed and acquired a three dimensional topography.
3. REPRODUCTION OF THE MAP
The requirements for the reproduction were that the three
dimensional surface of the map must be taken into account and
the resolution of the texture should be so high that also the
smallest details of the map are distinguished.
3.1 Image acquisition
The original map was photographed in the University of
Uppsala, Sweden. Prof. Henrik Haggrén from Helsinki
University of Technology was developing a method for
photographing maps and Dr. Lily Diaz-Kommonen and
photographer Antti Huittinen from the University of Art and
Design Helsinki took the photographs.
In order to get enough detailed images, the map had to be
photographed in pieces. The scale of the photographs was
designed to be 1:2. In this scale the smallest details of the map
can be distinguished using 5 x magnification. The used camera
was a Sinar repro camera with a 180 mm macro Sinacron
objective. The image size of the camera is 10 cm x 12,5 cm, so
the map was photographed in pieces of about 20 cm x 25 cm.
The photographs were taken through a grid frame, with grid
size of 20 cm x 25 cm. The grid was made of thin threads and
formed four strips, each strip consisting of six images. Each
grid cell was covered with an image size of 4" x 5", color
diapositive (100 ASA Kodak Ektachrome EPP, f /22.5) and 9
cm x 12 cm, black and white negative. The distance between
the camera and the surface of the map was about 66 cm. The
grid was lifted a few centimeters up from the map so that the
whole surface of the map was visible in the photographs. The
grid was used here both for guiding the photography and for
controlling the geometry between adjacent images.
Because the surface of the map was three dimensional, an
elevation model was needed for producing an image mosaic.
Therefore each strip was recorded with a stereo photography of
55 94 overlap. In order to provide "normal" stereo viewing of
the map as well, an additional stereo mate was recorded for
each image covering a full cell area. The base length was 22
mm and the base-to-distance ratio was 1/30. This. corresponds
to a normal stereo viewing at a distance of two meters. One
additional set of b/w-images was recorded with low oblique
lighting in order to produce relief effects by shadowing. In total
80 color images and 124 black and white images were taken.
(Haggrén)
FT: $ @
— 66 cm 1
A. A. A. Ah. A. A. A
Y à d v à À v v à €
fH i — 7 cm
MM ——— ma
Figure 2. The map was photographed in pieces through a grid
frame.
The images were scanned with pixel size of 1200 dpi or 20 um.
Assuming that people normally see points having a size of 0.1
mm, the scanned images could be viewed with 5 X
magnification.
When we got the scanned images it came out that the original
edges of the images were cut off. It is obvious that this was a
mistake because the original corners of the images would be
needed for defining the interior orientation of the images.
Despite of that we decided to use the images for the
reproduction.
Internat
Figure
32 0
Totally
were o
were ci
be use
The re
size, t
would
3.2.1
the im
points
the pri
not vei
others
why w
be (0,
orienta
param
3.2.2
to one
all the
Totally
measu
Also 5
image:
pixels.