ind,
e, volume,
edicine, or
decade, the
lose range
ography at
objects of
he popular
1 acgisition
'cture and
ents in the
sured and
10ds based
ic cameras
etry, close
the digital
have been
jc. Non-
mples, the
ed into the
processing
lose range
ion of the
lose range
t would be
phy do not
of digital
neras. The
cometry of
systematic
availability
nds ealier
ors. The
uch as for
possibility
] introduce
can not be
possible or
ELS OF
s.
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B5. Istanbul 2004
integrated geometric data and semantic information on 3D
realistic models of monuments and buildings. The geometrical
data for such information systems are determined with the
integrated data from topographical information systems based
on aerial photogrammetry and data on 3D.realistic models
obtained by close range photogrammetry. The Visually
Realistic 3D Models (VRM) of the objects, which are very
usefull for comprehensive documentation and analysis of
historical monuments and buildings, contain;
e the Numerical Frame of Reference (NFR) for their
structure, and
e the Texture Image Database (TID) for the selected
surfaces of the objects.
The NFR is the simple form of 3D presentation which describes
the main parameters of a structure. Such form is sufficient for
planning and monioring of objects in many applications.
However, in case of the detailed analysis of the objects, for
example some historical monuments, the Realistic 3D Models
are needed with all the structural details and texture. For these
purposes, the close range digital methods, based on images
taken from the amatour digital cameras, are becoming popular,
because of their economical aspects. However, they require
some precautions to prevent the suitable accuracy of the
determined geometrical data. The most important are listed as
follows; (1) The camera has to be checked for the level of
stability of the interior orientation and generation of image
systematic errors. The amatour cameras have the unknown and
variable at time and conditions interior orientation. The images
are taken from variable close range distances and with variable
focusing of the camera. Therefore the camera has to be
calibrated under required photographical conditions and
checked in respect to its stability. (2) To reconstruct the
numerical frame of reference for the object in the required
reference coordinates system some control points have to be
determined in that system by the precise surveying methods.
These points (premarked or natural features) have to be properly
distributed around the architectural structure and well identified
on images. The points which describe the frame of reference
(NFR) of the object are usually natural points but they have to
be carefully choosen to be well identified on photographs. (3)
The set of photographs for the whole object have to be carefully
planned to prevent the proper geometrical accuracy of
photogrammetric reconstruction of the object and to identify
all points on photographs required for determination of the
frame of reference and textural data of the object. (4) The
suitable package for close range processing which permits to
reconstruct accurately the shapes of all bundles of rays and
orient them in respect to the object reference coordinate system,
and therefore to execute the reconstruction of the frame
reference of the object and the collection of the textural data.
There are many examples of the real 3D modeling used for
documentation of historical haritage. Some are presented in
(Kolbl, Cherradi, Hostettler, 2000; Hongo, Matsuoka, 2000;
Bartolotta, di Naro and others, 2000; Streilen, Hanke,
Grussenmeyer, 2000).
In the experiments carried out in the Department of
Photogrammetry at the Warsaw University of Technology two
packages Orient/Orpheus and PhotoModeler were used for
reconstruction and modeling of the of the two objects; the inside
part of the construction of the Main Aula at the Warsaw
University of Technology (Bujakiewicz, Kowalczyk, Zawieska,
2003) and some elements of the old building at Warsaw. For the
first object the photographs were taken with the digital camera
Nikon E990. During a’priori camera calibration all interior
orientation parameters, including image systematic errors, were
determined (Kowalczyk, 2003). It has been found that the
interior geometry of bundles was quite stable during series of
photos taken with the same conditions. The efficiency of the
correction of the image systematic errors was analysed on base
of 15 photographs taken for the 2D test. The differences in the
mean square errors evaluated on base of 56 control points were
within 0.2 + 0.3 pixels. The stability of the interior orientation
was checked by taking the series of 10 photos for the 3D test.
It has been found, that the focal distance and the principal point
were stable within 2 + 4 pixels. In fig. 2.1, two stereo photos for
the West part of the Aula are shown. After pre-correction for
the image systematic errors the programme Orient/Orpheus was
used for the reconstruction and modelling. The absolute
orientation of the model was executed with the accuracy of
0.016 m. The frame reference of the object with the selected
surfaces is presented in fig. 2.2
Fig. 2.2. The selected surfaces for visualization surfaces of the
west part of the Aula.
Fig. 2.3 Visualization of 3 D model with the textural data