bul 2004 
; case the 
| an inner 
6 control 
(Xf control 
projective 
phs were 
1e control 
aphs was 
re 9B/F). 
9A) was 
X camera 
ct-camera 
ering the 
shot from 
photo had 
  
he belfry. 
corrected 
ctification 
available 
the outer 
ile hoist, 
ied single 
ons) were 
lel to the 
Is (Canon 
ed. So, in 
itions and 
of photos 
arches the 
on added 
nd, these 
) of the 
     
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
   
     
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B5. Istanbul 2004 
  
   
A B 
Figure 10. A: Image rectified mosaic of outer east walls and belfry. B: Image rectified mosaic of outer north walls and belfry 
Figure 11 shows a selection of highly oblique photographs the right pillar was covered by convergent photographs. In 
employed in the bundle adjustment to solve the upper section the left part of the mosaic the deformation of walls and arch 
of the rear arches. Workplace limitations made extremely is noticeable. Thus this arch is leaning toward the chapel. 
complicate the measurement of control points due to 
excessively inclination of sight. So, most part of control In both Figures 12 and 13 images of the nave walls have been 
points was by means of photogrammetric network added in the background only for visualization. 
densification. The rectified images mosaic of the rear arches 
is illustrated in Figure 12. 
  
   
X 
Figure 11. Photographs upper part of rear arches in the nave. 
Camera Canon D30 and 35 mm lens. 
       
Figure 13 shows the front side of the arches. In this case uk - imu = 
stereopairs with the Canon D30 and 20 mm lens helped with Figure 13. Images rectified mosaic of front arches in the nave 
the stereoscopic bar (Figure 5) were taken. Because 
limitations at the right side impeded the use of stereopairs,