Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 5)

    
  
  
    
    
    
   
  
  
     
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
   
  
   
    
    
   
  
    
     
  
    
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
   
    
  
  
  
   
  
  
    
  
  
   
    
  
    
    
bul 2004 
xcavated 
erranean 
1at there 
logically 
ir seeing 
varier 
Mexico 
ions and 
he solar 
place. 
cases a 
ps solar 
nstrated 
leasured 
studies 
ec also 
y. 
mran in 
  
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV. Part B5. Istanbul 2004 
  
The bodies in the graves of Qumran were, for instance, placed 
according to a sophisticated celestial geography. The bodies 
were oriented in the direction of north which was the source of 
rebirth and life, and the south, were the souls were believed to 
be dwelling, and the east were the sun rose from. Most of the 
excavated bodies have the face turned east, the direction where 
the stars and the sun was reborn, as to emphasize the impact of 
celestial bodies on man's life. 
5. CONCLUSIONS AND RESUMÉ 
Before our survey, the settlement of Qumran had not been 
studied in its archaeological and environmental context before. 
The central planning that we have determined that existed at 
Qumran in the Graeco-Roman period can be seen in the two- 
axial grid system and the astronomical layout of the grids. 
These demonstrate clearly that the settlement and the cemetery 
at Qumran are contemporary and are produced by the same 
community. Solar thinking and ancient solar and stellar 
hierophanies must have influenced the builders of the settlement 
and the cemetery at Qumran, as the axial directions measured 
follow the solar and stellar declinations of the important 
celestial bodies. This is confirmed by the solar calendar found 
in the Dead Sea Scrolls (Tov, 2000), and recently published 
sun-dial of an astrolab type (Albani and Glessmer, 1997). 
The effects of the geoarchaeological processes that affected the 
region in antiquity. should be re-evaluated. We have, for 
instance, been able to show that a damaging earthquake did not 
affect the area of Qumran in 31 B.C. as the excavators of the 
site originally claimed. They thought that the main reason for 
the *abandoning of Qumran' in the late Herodian period was the 
earthquake. Instead, the marl terrace where the settlement of 
Qumran is located was affected by corrosion through 
weathering processes. This can be seen already from the 
photographic documentation done during the past 40 years, for 
instance, of the same water used as ritual baths. The 
photographs revealed clearly that sediment structures at the site 
are unstable, easily swelling and desiccating causing fissures, 
rills and landslides, which at a first sight resemble tectonic 
fractures but which are not. Also a devastating paleoflood that 
lead to the submerging of the site of Qumran under the Dead 
Sea around the turn of the millennium, is a possibility detectable 
in the deposits of minerals found in the walls of the Qumran 
ruins, the skeletons in the graveyard and the scroll wrappers in 
the scroll caves that had been affected by salts from the Dead 
Sea. 
REFERENCES 
Abel, F. M., 1933-1938. Géographie de la Palestine. Vol. I, 
Géographie physique et historique and Vol. II, Géographie 
politique. Les villes. Etudes Bibliques 28/1-2, Paris. 
Albani, M. and Glessmer, U. Un instrument de mesures 
astronomiques à Qumrán, Revue Biblique, 104:1, pp. 88-115. 
Atlas of Israel. Cartography, Physical Geography, Human and 
Economic Geography, History. (No authors or editors 
mentioned) 1970. Published by Survey of Israel, Ministry of 
Labour. Jerusalem and Elsevier, Amsterdam. 
Atlas of Israel. Cartography, Physical Geography and 
Geography of the Land (in Hebrew). (No authors or editors 
mentioned) 1985. Tel Aviv. 
The first international archaeological conference on the 
archacology of Qumran, Brown University, Providence, 
November 17-19 2002, entitled ‘Qumran: The Site of the Dead 
Sea Scrolls, Archaeological Interpretation and Debates, 
November 17-19, 2002'. Congress volume forthcoming 2004. 
Leiden Brill. 
Clermont-Ganneau, Charles, 1874. The Jerusalem Researches, 
Letters from M. Clermount-Ganneau lll. Jerusalem, October 5- 
10, 1873. PEFQS, April 1874, pp. 80-83. 
Clermont-Ganneau, Charles, 1896. Archaeological Researches 
in Palestine during 1873-74, Vol. II, pp. 14-16, London. 
Kattunen, Hannu, Krôger, Pekka, Oja, Heikki, Poutanen, 
Markku, Donner, Karl Johan (Eds.), 1990. Astronomie — Eine 
Einführung. Berlin. 
Klein, Cippora, 1965. On the fluctuations of the level of the 
Dead Sea since the beginning of the 1 9" century, Hydrological 
Paper No. 7. Jerusalem. 
Klein, Cippora, 1982. Morphological Evidence of Lake Level 
Changes, Western Shore of the Dead Sea. Israel Journal of 
Earth-Sciences, 31, pp. 67-94. 
Lónnqvist, Minna and Lónnqvist, Kenneth, 2002. Archaeology 
of the Hidden Qumran The New Paradigm. Helsinki University 
Press, Helsinki. 
Meeus, Jean, 1991. Astronomical Algorithms. Willman-Bell, 
Inc. 
Meeus, Jean, 2002. More Mathematical Astronomy. Willman- 
Bell, Inc. 
Niemi, Tina M. and Smith II, Andrew M., 1999. Initial Results 
of the Southeastern Wadi Araba, Jordan Geoarchaeological 
Study: Implications for Shifts in Late Quaternary Aridity. 
Geoarchaeology: An International Journal, 14, No. 8, pp. 791- 
820. 
Tov, Emanuel et alii, 2000. The Texts from the Judaean Desert, 
Vol. XXXIX, Indices and An Introduction to the Discoveries in 
the Judaean Desert Series. Oxford. 
Tov, Emanuel, 2003. Controversies around the Dead Sea 
Scrolls. Teologinen Aikakausikirja/The Theological Review, 5, 
pp. 387-400, especially pp. 394-395. 
Tsafrir, Yoram, Di Segni, Leah and Green, Judith (Eds.) with 
contributions by Roll, Israel and Tsuk, Tsvika, 1994. Tabula 
Imperii Romani (TIR), Iudaea © Palestine, Eretz Israel in the 
Hellenistic, Roman and Bvzantine Periods, Maps and 
Gazetteer. Jerusalem. 
Watzman, Haim, 1994. Lusher times at Masada. New Scientist, 
143, September 3, No. 1941, p. 5. 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
We wish to thank the École Biblique et Archéologique 
Française, Jerusalem, and Father Jean-Baptiste Humbert in 
particular for the photographs and the permissions. At the Israel 
Antiquities Authority we thank Zvi Greenhut. Our special 
thanks goes to Reino Anttila from Helsinki. 
    
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.