ul 2004
M
S
1
C
5
zem
eb
ur
e,
at
of
4
6-
Completing the Task Group Proposal
Template document to communicate the
essence of your task group’s purpose,
activities and outputs. Note that all proposals
(and eventual results) will be hyperlinked to
the names of Chairs provided in the Matrix of
Task Groups, and made available on the
RecorDIM site.
Contacting specialists from other
conservation organizations that are interested
in playing the role of Information User and
Provider within a task group. Page 3 of the
Task Group Proposal Template provides a
list of Partners and Potential Partners that
may be consider for task group activities. As
indicated under RESPONSIBILITY (page 4
of the Operational Framework), the User and
Provider that join a task group should be
involved in developing the proposal. This is
to ensure that the problem statement reflects
both the User 's and Provider ’s
understanding, and that the Task Group
deliverables meet the needs of both the Users
and Providers.
An alternative to Step 5 would be that task
group Chairs seek partners directly on the
internet by using the new ‘Alliance Hub’
page which was recently added to the
RecorDIM site. As all task group proposals
will be linked to the ‘Matrix of Task Groups’
provided under ‘Alliance Hub’, it is
suggested that task group Chairs add an
invitation page to their proposals welcoming
User and Provider Organizations worldwide
to participate. This way, the ‘Matrix of Task
Groups’ becomes a ‘communication tool’ for
Chairs to interact directly with organizations
that show an interest in the activities of a task
group.
Refering to the Framework of RecorDIM
Task Groups (under ‘Reports ^) to indicate
where each task group should be inserted.
This Framework is posted on the RecorDIM
web site as a tool to help conservation
specialists worldwide to see what RecorDIM
gaps/needs are being addressed. This
Framework is also used to identify in green
text ,the important RecorDIM gaps that
remain to be addressed / resolved.
Finally, by sending draft proposal together
with letter of intent to the RecorDIM
International Coordinator
(Letellier.r@sympatico.ca) for feedback.
After making revisions from comments
received, a second draft proposal is circulated
by the coordinator to the RecorDIM Partners
for review prior to the next RecorDIM
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part BS. Istanbul 2004
Partners Meeting that takes place in the
spring of each year.
All new task group proposals are presented to
RecorDIM Partners by the task group Chairs and
discussed / commented on before they are
implemented.
3.2 Task Group ALLIANCE HUB'
During the second half of 2003, in response to the
RecorDIM meetings that took place in Austria,
Turkey, Zimbabwe and Sri Lanka, more than 15
new task group proposals were initiated (see Task
Group Delivery Table in appendix B hereafter).
To facilitate the coordination of new task groups in
the making, the RecorDIM site map was slightly
re-organized to provide RecorDIM Partners and
Potential Partners with New Tools to help with the
creation and coordination of Task Groups. For
example:
oO
the RecorDIM web page entitled ‘Task
Groups’ now provides procedures to help
conservation organizations to define and
implement new task groups:
= Us sub-section ‘Operational
Framework’, provides guidelines and
task group examples;
€
- its sub-section ‘Seeking Alliances’,
introduces the ‘Alliance Hub’ (or
meeting place) specially designed for
task group Chairs to seek support from
User and Provider organizations that
wish to input / participate to task group
activities.
The Task Group web page also provides two
new matrices that allow to see & a glance
who is doing what in terms of creating /
chairing task groups;
- its sub-section Task Groups Delivery
Table’ provides a chronological list of
on-goin and new RecorDIM Task
Groups with the names of Chairs. It also
provides target dates for reviewing
progress and publishing results. This list
is updated quarterly.
= its sub-section “Matrix of Task
Groups’ (appendix C) provides an
overview of the GAPs being addressed,
and by whom. This Matrix is also meant
to be a ‘tool’ for conservation
organizations / specialists worldwide, to
highlight in GREEN the areas / subjects
that still need to be addressed, thus
inciting conservation organizations to
create new task groups.