International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B5. Istanbul 2004 
) 8 8 / J 
5 CONCLUSIONS 
Conclusions are as follows: 
(1) The stop-and-go strategy proposed by the authors 
makes the inertial survey more accurate than the 
conventional nonstop strategy. 
(2) The accuracy increases as the speed of the equipment 
increases. 
(3) The accuracy is strongly influenced by the perform- 
ance of gyros. 
(4) The accuracy is improved by the stop-and-go strategy 
even with low-performance gyros. 
(5) The bias correction is quite effective, especially when 
it is used together with the stop-and-go strategy, to 
improve the accuracy. 
REFERENCES 
1) Innes J.: Inertial platform techniques for rapid surveys 
of hilliness and bendiness, Sensors Highway and Civil 
Engineering; London, p.143-154, 1981 
2) Chapman W. H.: Proposed specifications for inertial 
surveying, Tech. Paper Annu. Meeting American 
Congr. Survey Mapping, No.43, p.287-293, 1983 
3) Roof E. F.: Inertíal survey systems, J. Surv. Eneti 
Vol.109, No.2, p.116-135, 1983 
4) Cross P. A.: Inertial surveying, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 
Vol.6, No.10, p.1585-1589, 1985 
5) Suzuki H. et al.: Real-time measurement of altitude 
data using the accelerometer, International Archives 
of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Hakodate, 
Vol. XXXII, Part 5, p.278-283, 1998 
6) Koizumi T. et al.: Fundamental study on development 
and application of the local positioning system using 
accelerometer and gyroscope, Proc. Int. Workshop on 
Mobile Mapping Technology, Bangkok 6B-5-1 - 6B- 
5-6, 1999 
7) Shirai Y. et al: Fundamental study on real time 
measurement of altitude data with accelerometer and 
vehicle speed sensor, International Archives of 
Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Amsterdam, 
Vol. XXXIII, Part B1, p.301-306, 2000 
  
    
  
  
   
  
  
  
   
   
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
   
  
   
tu 
af 
ci 
es