Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 6)

2004 
  
and 
range 
ping, 
shore 
eased 
n and 
nodel 
ted in 
d the 
1cipal 
RSF) 
May 
' unit. 
tative 
oL EO 
event 
ctices 
id the 
) CD 
oublic 
;s and 
o 
ng. 
ed by 
‘borne 
y as a 
n the 
/ the 
| (but 
ar) for 
lution 
aerial 
. Sites 
iques, 
n. 
work 
from 
ted as 
mbers 
ansion 
; 2004 
ion in 
ificant 
photo 
ly via 
ion of 
hough 
rvices 
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B6. Istanbul 2004 
  
to independent companies was generally welcomed, at the same 
time the tendency for private and government companies in the 
UK and W. Europe to sub-contract work overseas is seen as 
detrimental to the home-based photogrammetric industry. A 
general shortage of trained specialist photogrammetrists in the 
UK was noted. 
A small minority of respondents felt that significant RS 
applications effort and research uptake has been lacking in the 
UK, inhibiting UK industry competitiveness. However, the 
majority of respondents indicate a range of significant positive 
changes that have impacted on research and commercial 
activity. The most frequently cited changes in the 
photogrammetric community relate to the rise of laser scanning 
as a credible source of survey and environmental data and the 
continued increase in the use of digital imaging technology. The 
movement from analytical to digital, noted as intensifying in the 
national report 4 years ago, has continued. Most companies that 
have only recently started operations with imagery (either aerial 
or close-range) use digital processes exclusively, and may have 
started with no previous experience of analytical 
photogrammetry. Specific software packages for handling 
digital data were listed by many respondents, these being either 
standard commercial packages, modelling tools or other 
software developed in house. 
5. SIGNIFICANT CHANGES 2000 to 2004 
In respect of the most significant developments in 
photogrammetry and remote sensing in the UK during the 
period 2000-2004, most comment concerned changes in EO 
funding under NERC, the opportunities presented by the GMES 
programme and specific reference to technological issues. 
Consolidation for the industry has been provided by the profile 
and continuing rise of "geo" applications in their broadest sense. 
[Increased difficulty in obtaining research funds to support UK 
research has been noted. It is attributed in part to increased 
competition for research funds and a tendency for UK Research 
Councils to preferentially support large and high profile 
initiatives, such as the EO Centres of Excellence (see below). 
At the same time, major joint EC (FP6) and ESA activities, 
linked to GMES, are providing significant funding opportunities 
for commercial operators and the well funded research 
laboratories. Whilst the UK has been successful in this area 
during the reporting period, the benefits are not spread widely. 
On a European scale, the development of the GMES 
collaboration between ESA and the EC has changed (and 
bundled) the priorities of the Earth Observation activities in the 
European framework programme and the ESA Service Element. 
GMES represents new opportunities to open up an institutional 
market for EO and BNSC provide the UK lead in coordinating 
national activities under the GMES initiative within ESA and 
the EC FP6 programme. Within the UK, BNSC coordinate an 
inter-departmental working group to inform UK government 
and research departments and define UK priorities for GMES. 
The UK leads two current GMES GSE projects: "Terrafirma" 
on Europe-wide subsidence monitoring from SAR 
interferometry and the recently launched "Respond" project on 
Humanitarian Assistance to develop an Open Service 
Partnership that will support humanitarian interventions 
globally. UK consortia are engaged in many of the other ten 
GMES GSE projects currently ongoing. 
79 
Lord Sainsbury (UK Minister for Science and Technology, 
including space) announced the publication of a new UK Space 
Strategy in December 2003 following public consultation. Key 
drivers behind the strategy will be to promote an innovative and 
competitive space sector and ensure that UK citizens, scientists 
and enterprises will have access to advanced space-based 
systems and services. BNSC partners are developing their 
supporting space plans and budgets to meet this new strategy. 
Due to restructuring, DTI funding for 2003/04 could only 
support a reduced national programme of projects. However, it 
was able to support a combined New Techniques for 
Observation Needs (NEWTON) and Service Mission Support 
(SMS) programme. The GIFTSS Government. partnering 
programme to stimulate institutional markets operated 
throughout the reporting period. In line with the new UK Space 
Policy, the DTI is developing a revised Space Plan based on 
new funding mechanisms to support a national programme for 
exploiting the commercial potential of EO. More information is 
available at www.bnsc.gov.uk 
The NERC, which is primarily responsible for the exploitation 
and use of EO for environmental science applications, has 
recently assumed greater responsibility for science in Earth 
Observation in the UK. It now manages the UK ESA 
subscriptions to the Earth Explorer missions, the EO Envelope 
Programme and Envisat operations and exploitation. NERC 
also coordinates a number of EO initiatives including their new 
Centres of Excellence, the New Observing Techniques (NOT) 
programme, the LINK programme and an Enabling Fund along 
with scientific instrument development such as HIRDLS and 
GERB. NERC issued its Draft Strategy on EO for consultation 
2003. This aims to shape the future direction of NERC's work 
towards using EO to create a more sustainable environment for 
the future and will contribute to UK funding policy. It will have 
implications for the scientific research community, and will also 
require cross-cutting collaboration with the UK industrial base 
with respect to forthcoming mission selection and exploitation 
priorities. 
During 2002, NERC inaugurated a number of EO Centres of 
Excellence’. These are in addition to the already established 
NERC Centres and Institutes? that research and use remote 
sensing data in a variety of applications to meet diverse needs. 
The Centres of Excellence programme is one of the most 
significant recent UK developments, and channels significant 
research funding plus a big institutional push towards priority 
areas of science, under the NERC "Science for a Sustainable 
Future" Strategy. The first NERC Earth Observation Workshop 
took place in March 2003. The second meeting was held at 
Plymouth in June 2004. Further information is available at 
http://www.nerc.ac.uk/funding/earthobs/ . 
6. SUGGESTED CHANGES 2004-2008 
Commercial companies, universities and government agencies 
are broadly optimistic about the future of remote sensing but 
less confident with regard to photogrammetry. Tables 6.1a and 
6.1b show that actual levels of activity compared fairly well 
  
! The Centre for Terrestrial Carbon Dynamics (CTCD), Centre for Polar 
Observations and Monitoring (CPOM), Centre of Observation and 
Modelling of Earthquakes & Tectonics (COMET), Data Assimilation 
Research Centre (DARC) and the Environmental Systems Science 
Centre (ESSC). 
? These include the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (CEH), the 
3ritish Geological Survey (BGS), the British Antarctic Survey (BAS), 
the Southampton Oceanography Centre (SOC), the Plymouth Marine 
Laboratory (PML) and the Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory (POL). 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.