e
al
le
ys
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B7. Istanbul 2004
Swath width
With a broader swath width the capacity of the satellites is also
increased. In fact a 4 satellites with a swath of 20km can cover
the same area as 8 satellites with 10km swath. The effect of the
swath is shown in figure-8. It can be seen that the effectiveness
of a wide swath drops after a swath width wider than 15km.
When the situation of 8 satellites with a 10km swath is
compared to
À constellation of 4 satellites with 20km swath results in 43%
of monitoring capacity, while a constellation of 8 satellites with
LOkm swath has a capacity of 4996. The higher value probably
is an effect of the more detailed following of the pipeline
trajectory and the more frequent observation opportunities.
% of total monitoring days versus field of view
7096
e |
© 60% +—-----....... =
D . |
o 50% = DAN ACEI =
= Zn |
Q9 409*]-—— — ss ioe]
= E T
2 30% 4 Se pr n period 15-21 days
!
T 20% = = :
E 2 | El period 8-14 days
-— 1095 4— [5] bi EADS: cd |
as : |
0% \
E S = =
x Xx X MX
uw» © wn e
vie x — N
v— e wn ©
field of view
Figure-8: The effect of different swath widths in % of total
required monitoring capacity.
Pointing range
Finally different ranges for the pointing in along and across
track direction are simulated. See figure-9. As expected the
effectiveness of the system increases with larger pointing
ranges. This as a consequence of the wider area in which
pipeline trajectories can be selected and clouded regions
avoided, and as a consequence of the longer observation time as
a consequence of the larger forward/afterward pointing range.
From an interpretation point of view a pointing range wider
than 33 degrees is not realistic however.
% of total monitoring days for all elements
100% a ie a té rp rey
90%
= |
m 80% ta or ar dé etat te ci mé cc et era carre pure one pm
© { |
© 70% AA, tt rer ét EU tar d |
£ bo d il
S 6% frm It
T BU. Ete den m E L..] period 15-21 days |
E il
* 40% | i
2 30% E - i D period 8-14 days |
= 20% LE A Dni | i
10% H+ MS - 4 |
0% } |
o o [2] i
E 8 38 |
m ch A C e o i
- $$ "$8 v X
pointing range |
Figure-9: The effect of the pointing range in 96 of total required
monitoring capacity.
6. OUTLOOK
The simulation results provide good insight in the use of high
resolution optical satellites for monitoring of the European gas
pipeline network. Additional simulations will be carried out in
order to obtain answers to several questions. In the first place
simulations with constellations of larger number of satellites
and some wider swathes. Theoretically in a non clouded
situation the network should can be covered with 8 satellites. As
the found effect of cloud cover is about 50% this means that
simulations with constellations up to 15 satellites are required.
Secondly attention will be paid to the combination of high
resolution optical satellites with other collection assets like SAR
satellites and airborne platforms with optical or SAR sensors,
either manned 'platforms or UAV's (Hausemann, 2003). For
this the less suited pipeline trajectories (non dense areas and
east-west directed lines) can be filled in by this other platforms
and left out of the scheduling. As a consequence the high
resolution optical satellite effectiveness may increase.
A third point of interest is to simulate situations for higher
monitoring frequencies of 10 or 7 days.
Finally attention will be paid to the satellite scheduling strategy.
It is expected that by optimising the scheduling algorithms the
results can be improved.
7. CONCLUSIONS
It can be concluded that for the two weekly monitoring of the
extended European pipeline network with high resolution
optical satellites a large constellation is required. The
simulations learn that in case of optimal use of cloud
information 29% of the monitoring work can be obtained with 4
satellites and 49% with 8 satellites.
A wider swath, better scheduling algorithms and proper co-
ordination with other SAR and airborne collection assets can
obtain further optimisation ofthe constellation.
The use of proper cloud information is essential for the
effectiveness of the optical satellite constellation. The
simulations shows an increase of 104%
The CLIMAS simulation tool is a powerful tool for simulation
of the capabilities of an optical satellite constellation related to
a specific application and with realistic cloud coverage
conditions.
8. REFERENCES AND AKNOWLEDGEMENTS
8.1 References
Algra, T.; Kamp, A van der; Persie, M. van. Results with
CLIMAS, a simulation tool for cloud avoidance scheduling in
optical remote sensing missions. SpaceOPS Conference 2004,
Montreal, Canada, May 17-21, 2004
Algra, T. Real-time cloud sensing for efficiency improvement
of optical high-resolution satellite remote sensing. Proc.
IGARSS'03, Toulouse, 2003
Dekker, R.J.; Lingenfelder, I; Brozek, B.; Benz, U; Broek, A.C.
van den. Object-based detection of hazards to the European gas
pipeline network using SAR images. 2004
Haar, T.H. von der; et al. Climatological and Historical
Analysis of Clouds of Environmental Simulations (CHANCES)
Database — Final report. PL-TR-95-2101, Philips Laboratory,
Hanscom Air Force Base, Mass., (1995)
1065