Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 7)

  
  
  
  
  
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B7. Istanbul 2004 
  
  
  
anisotropic field. The anisotropy being a function of sediment 
preferred orientation arising from water flow direction. 
There are other problems with using a semi-variogram 
approach, as indicated by Atkinson & Lewis (2000). 
Homogenous regions of varying texture must be large enough to 
allow computation of the semi-variogram with a reasonable 
number of lags. In many cases, areas of interest are too small 
relative to the spatial resolution of the imagery. Computation of 
the semi-variogram is also intensive, particularly if the full 
variogram surface is generated. A consequent problem is how 
this surface is represented and stored to a precision sufficient 
for the classification process. For each desired profile direction, 
à minimum of three parameters is necessary and these results 
suggest that storing both downstream and cross-stream 
parameters would be essential. 
Despite these drawbacks it is believed that additional texture 
layers represented by either variance or semi-variograms could 
provide additional information necessary for bed-classification 
and the derivation of grain-scale data from aerial imagery. 
5. CONCLUSION 
This project has demonstrated that it is possible to derive a five- 
fold bed classification to a true accuracy of 4996 using just the 
three original colour bands and 1:5.000 scale photography. It 
has to be recognised that this was achieved using a “per-pixel” 
classification within non-homogeneous bed material. If material 
had been homogeneous, accuracies would have been higher. It 
was found necessary to create an additional “texture” layer 
using a 3x3 -variance convolution filter. It was found that 
classification accuracy was not affected greatly by varying the 
photo-scale, with 1:10,000 scale imagery also yielding a valid 
classification. Significantly, it was found that simple grey-scale 
imagery could yield useful classifications, provided a texture 
layer was generated and used. Alternative methods of deriving 
a texture layer were investigated. Autocorrelation yielded only a 
modest improvement to 51%. The semi-variogram could 
provide the basis for useful measures of bed texture and may 
improve the classification accuracies further but efficient 
storage of semi-variogram data is required. 
Once a classified image had been generated from the aerial 
imagery it was simple to derive a percentage sand map. 
Comparison between this and traditional ground-based methods 
requiring intensive fieldwork, highlighted the potential for 
significant savings in time and effort if aerial imagery is 
acquired. More detailed examination of the optimal photo-scale 
for identifying sand patches remains an area for further 
development. 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support 
provided by the Natural Science and Engineering Research 
Council of Canada (NSERC) for fieldwork support and 
helicopter hire. 
REFERENCES 
Atkinson, P.M. and Lewis, P. 2000. Geostatistical 
classification for remote sensing: an introduction. Computers 
and Geosciences, 26, pp. 361-371. 
Chandler, J.H., Shiono, K., Rameshwaren, P. and Lane, S.N. 
2001. Measuring flume surfaces for hydraulics research using a 
Kodak DCS460, Photogrammetric Record, 17(97), pp. 39-61. 
Chica-Olmo, M. and Abarca-Hernandez, F., 2000. Computing 
geostatistical image texture for remotely sensed data 
classification, Computers and Geosciences, 26, pp. 373-383. 
Church, 2004. Fraser River Gravel Reach Studies 
http//www.geog.ubc.ca/fraserri ver/ (accessed: 4 March, 2004) 
Fripp, J. B., and Diplas, P. 1993. Surface sampling in gravel 
streams. American Society of Civil Engineers, Journal of 
Hydraulic Engineering, 119, pp. 473-490. 
Gilvear D.J., Waters, T.M., and Milner, A.M., 1995. Image 
analysis of aerial photography to quantify changes in channel 
morphology and instream habitat following place mining in 
interior Alaska. Freshwater Biology. 34, pp.389-398. 
Gilvear DJ, 1999. Fluvial geomorphology and river 
engineering: future poles utilizing a fluvial hydrosystems 
framework. Geomorphology, 31 (1-4), pp- 229-245. 
Gilvear DJ, 2001. Discussion of: Lane, S.N., 2001. (The 
measurement of gravel-bed river morphology, in “Gravel Bed 
Rivers V", Mosley, M.P. (ed). NZ Hydrology Society, 
Wellington, pp. 323-324. 
ISO, 1992. Liquid flow measurement in open channels - 
sampling and analysis of gravel-bed material International 
Organisation of Standardization, Publication 9195, pp. 9. 
Lane, S.N., 2001. The measurement of gravel-bed river 
morphology, in «Gravel Bed Rivers V", Mosley, M..P (ed). 
NZ Hydrology Society, Wellington, pp. 323-324. 
Marks K, Bates P, 2000. Integration of high-resolution 
topographic data with floodplain flow models. Hydrological 
Processes, 14 (11-12), pp. 2109-2122. 
Rubin, DM, (2004). A simple auto-correlation algorithm for 
determining grain size from digital images of sediment. Journal 
of Sedimentary Research, 74 (1) pp. 160-165. 
Thomson AG, Fuller RM, Eastwood JA, 1998. Supervised 
versus unsupervised methods for classification of coasts and 
river corridors from airborne remote sensing. [International 
Journal of Remote Sensing, 19(17), pp. 3423-3431. 
Wolcott, J. F., and Church, M. 1991. Strategies for sampling 
spatially heterogeneous phenomena: the example of river 
gravels. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 61, pp. 534-543. 
Wolman MG, 1954. A method of sampling coarse river-bed 
material. American Geophysical Union Transactions, 35, pp. 
951-956. 
Wright A, Marcus WA, Aspinall R, 2000. Evaluation of 
multispectral, fine scale digital imagery as a tool for mapping 
stream morphology. Geomorphology, 33(1-2), pp. 107-120. 
1084 
KI 
AE 
His 
doi 
the 
we 
Site 
33 
15€ 
app 
diff 
info 
clot 
pres 
Uni 
A : 
char 
com 
£00( 
garri 
exan 
high 
signi 
Med 
To d 
role | 
for c 
resol 
very 
the v 
spect 
gradi 
Medi 
prope 
most 
propo 
of ma 
Norm 
poor | 
Meas 
by vir 
  
* Co
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.