Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 7)

  
INTEGRATING REMOTELY SENSED DATA WITH AN ECOSYSTEM MODEL 
TO ESTIMATE CROP YIELD IN NORTH CHINA 
a, b, * a 11: "a 
P. Yang ^5, G.X. Tan ^, Y. Zha®, R. Shibasaki* 
“Institute of Industrial Science, Tokyo University, Tokyo 153-8505, Japan 
yangpeng@iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp, (gxtan, shiba)@skl.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp 
° Institute of Natural Resources & Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences 
Beijing 100081, China - yzha@caas.ac.cn 
Commission VII, WG VII/2 
KEY WORDS: Remote Sensing, Agriculture, Crop, Estimation, Integration, Model, Accuracy, GIS 
ABSTRACT: 
This paper describes a method of integrating remotely sensed data (the MODIS LAI product) with an ecosystem model (the spatial 
EPIC model) to estimate crop yield in North China. The traditional productivity simulations based on crop models are normally site- 
specific. To simulate regional crop productivity, the spatial crop model is developed firstly in this study by integrating Geographical 
Information System (GIS) with Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) model. The integration applies a loose coupling 
approach. Data are exchanged using the ASCII or binary data format between GIS and EPIC model without a common user interface. 
It is crucial for the simulation accuracy of the spatial EPIC model to get the detailed initial conditions (sowing date, initial soil water 
content, etc) and management information (irrigation schedule, fertilizer schedule, tillage schedule, etc). But when applied at a large 
scale, the initial conditions and management information are most unlikely obtained through direct measurement. Therefore, the 
spatial EPIC model is integrated secondly with the MODIS LAI product from the Earth Resources Observation System (EROS) Data 
Center Distributed Active Archive Center. The integration of the MODIS LAI product makes the real time information taken into 
account in the simulation of spatial EPIC model, such as the amount of solar radiation captured by plant canopies, soil-water or 
nutrient effects on crop growth, and the effects of natural or man-made disturbances caused to crop yield. Finally, the method is 
conducted to estimate the Winter Wheat yield in North China in the year of 2003. 
1. INTRODUCTION 
Monitoring agricultural crop conditions during the growing 
season and estimating the potential crop yields are both 
important for the assessment of seasonal production (Paul et al. 
2003). The accurate and real-time estimation of crop yield in 
provincial and national level are of great interest to the 
Department of Agriculture in many countries. Integrating of 
satellite data and crop productivity models is one of the most 
important quantitative analysis methodologies for yields 
estimation in regional level. 
The traditional crop yield estimation based on satellite data is 
using the empirical relationships between dry biomass of 
various crops and Vegetation Indices, which are combinations 
of visible and near infrared bands. Hamar et al. (1996) 
established a linear regression model to estimate corn and wheat 
yield at a regional scale based on vegetation spectral indices 
computed with Landsat MSS data. Similar relationships are 
obtained on various crops (for example: Rasmussen [1992] for 
millet yield, Manjunath et al. [2002] for wheat yield). Although 
the VI approach is simple, the relationships only have a local 
value and are sensitive to soil and atmospheric conditions as 
well as measurement geometries. To estimate crop yield in any 
conditions, it is necessary to describe the physiological and 
biological mechanisms, which control crop growth and 
development (Moulin et al. 1998). Therefore various 
mechanistic models are inevitable to be integrated with remote 
  
sensing data for yield assessment of major crops in regional 
scale. 
Mechanistic models can simulate the time profiles of the crop 
state variables (leaf area index, crop stress factor, potential 
biomass increase etc.) and of energy, carbon, water and nutrient 
fluxes at the crop-soil-atmosphere interfaces. For more than 
three decade, mechanistic models have been developed for the 
major crops in the world. Compared with many other crop 
models around agro-ecosystems, the EPIC Model seems to be 
more suitable to simulate crop yields for relative comparisons of 
soils, crops, and management scenarios and has a good accuracy 
to estimate field yields (Tan et al. 2003). It was originally 
developed by United States Department of Agriculture to 
examine the relationship between soil erosion and agricultural 
productivity. The model integrates the major processes that 
occur in the soil-crop—atmosphere—management system, 
including: hydrology, weather, erosion, nutrients, plant growth, 
soil temperature, tillage, plant environmental control, and 
economics (Sharpley et al. 1995). Extensive tests of EPIC 
simulations were conducted at over 150 sites and on more than 
10 crop species and generally those tests concluded that EPIC 
adequately simulated crop yields (Easterling et al. [1998], 
Izaurralde et al. [2003 ]). 
The different ways to integrate a crop model with the 
radiometric observations were described initially by Maas 
(1988). Delecolle et al. (1992) and Moulin et al. (1998) 
* Corresponding author. Tel.: *81-3-5452-6417; Fax: *81-3-5452-6414; E-mail address: yangpeng@1is.u-tokyo.ac.jp 
150 
International 
HC ea 
identified the 
driving varia 
updating of 
the model; « 
resolution of 
step requirer 
direct use ol 
the other thr 
developed 
introducing 
Specific Wa 
(1996) used 
over sugar | 
adjusted par 
growth rate, 
current resea 
remote sensi 
whole yield 
Guerif et al. 
with the ci 
establishmer 
crops. Paul 
model with : 
North Dako 
the input pa 
regional levi 
coupling rad 
LAI produc 
Spectroradic 
be suit for 
operational 
The objectis 
yield model 
USDA (Un 
(Erosion Pri 
MODIS LA 
Geographica 
The study : 
Tianjin, the 
Henan Prov 
longitude by 
Figure ]. ' 
km” area
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.