Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 7)

International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B7. Istanbul 2004 
  
  
rectification accuracy (measured by root-mean-square error) 
based on a 2™ order transformation model was 1.7 pixel unit. 
Since the study area is quite flat with average elevation of 600 
m, there is no need for topographic normalization. 
The purpose of the classification is to create meaningful 
information class value from image by providing pixels of 
similar spectral characteristics. The supervised classification 
approach that requires priori information about land cover was 
used to categorize the pixels in a group. The GPS data and 
visual interpretation was used as the priori knowledge in this 
study. 
Instead of a specific land-cover classification system, a new one 
was prepared and applied in the area in terms of predominant 
crops. The scheme firstly categorized into three main classes as 
(1) agricultural area, (2) forest and pasture land, and (3) non- 
agricultural areas. These major classes are then divided in sub- 
classes (Table 1), The pistachio areas are included in orchards 
sub-classes of agricultural areas. 
2.2.1 Collection of spectral signatures: 
A signature is a range of brightness values of pixels for each 
band of digital images. These values have statistical meaning 
(mean, standard deviation etc.) so that each pixel is assigned to 
a class based on how well it matched with this signature. 
Collection of signatures can be done by selecting training pixel 
samples that are to be representative of particular class. 
Training samples for the study area were collected using 
ERDAS-IMAGINE's area of interest (AOI) tools. Training 
samples were tried to be selected from spectrally pure pixels 
representing target class. Training sites were determined with 
visual inspection and by overlying the locations of GPS data 
onto image. Approximately ten to fifteen training sites for each 
land-cover class were chosen by considering a good spatial 
distribution. As a result, only the signatures left in signature 
files were going to be assigned to the specific classes after 
running classification algorithm. These classes are accepted as 
real land cover of study area and used for the estimating of 
pistachio areas. Creation of signature files by means of training 
samples is performed separately for each county. So there were 
nine different signature files ready for supervised classification 
process. 
2.2.2 Classification Process: A variety of classifications 
algorithm methods have been used in remote sensing. One of 
these methods is maximum-likelihood classification algorithm 
which assumes that the data are normally distributed and based 
on the probability that a pixel belongs to a particular class 
(Jensen, 1996). 
In this project, the maximum likelihood classifier is used 
because it is still accepted as the most accurate time intensive 
classification algorithm compared to the others (Weber and 
Dunno, 2001). Maximum likelihood classifier algorithm takes 
into account class variability by using the covariance matrix for 
each signature (ERDAS, 1999). This algorithm was applied to 
previously subseted images of each county for which signature 
files had been created. Some photo interpretations were also 
used to increase the accuracy of digital classification. 
To determine the accuracy of the classification process, an 
accuracy assessment test was conducted for all classified 
images. Classification results are usually summarized as 
matrices which presents classification errors. These errors 
includes omission and commission errors. À common error, 
appears when a pixel wrongly assigned to a class of classified 
image, is measured by user accuracy (Zhuang, 1995). Kappa 
statistics is also important parameter for 
classification errors. It express “proportionate reduction in error 
generated by a classification process compared with the error of 
a completely random classification” (ERDAS, 1999). 
3. Results and discussion 
Area statistics for main crops in both province and county basis 
were produced from classified images. Total agricultural land 
was determined as 309213 ha in the province. Field crops 
constituted 148477 ha area, while orchards and vineyards 
covered 160735 ha (Table 1). 
Table 1. Disrtribution of agricultural lands by county. 
  
  
evaluation of 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Arable land Fruit crops 
Total (%) in (%) in 
aeri. total total 
land (ha) Área agric. Area agric. 
(ha) area (ha) area 
S.Kamil 47926 12873 27 35053 73 
S.Bey 49837 20833 42 29005 58 
Araban 21028 16107 77 4921 23 
Islahiye 15046 11905 79 3141 2] 
Kargam 28480 10923 38 17557 62 
Nizip 55985 12989 25 42996 77 
Nurdagi 22835 21096 92 1739 8 
Oguzeli 48118 32443 67 15675 33 
Yavuzeli 19956 9308 47 10648 53 
TOTAL 309213 148477 48 160735 52 
  
  
Wheat, barley, pulses and chickpea cover 125101 ha (84 % of 
field crop areas). Rest of the field crop area is covered by 
cotton, maize, vegetables and other crops. Pistachio areas 
constitute 58% of the total orchards in the province. Vineyards 
and olive groves together cover 35% of the area. The rest of the 
area is other fruits. Accuracy assesment test results were given 
in Table 2 for each county. Overall accuracy changes between 
74.5% and 85.6%. 
Table 2. Overal accuracy for each county. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Overall Overall 
County Accuracy County Accuracy (%) 
(%) 
SEHITKAMIL 82,10 NIZIP 77,10 
SAHINBEY 80,86 NURDAGI 85:59 
ARABAN 77,44 OGUZELI 75,98 
ISLAHIYE 74,71 YAVUZELI 81,10 
KARGAMIS 79,60 Average 79,38 
  
With this project remote sensing technology has been used to 
support area statistics for important crops. Since there was only 
county boundaries for project area as a base map, analysis were 
carried out on county basis. Cadastral maps that could supply 
more details were not available in digital format. Moreover, 
high resolution satellite images would be more effective to gel 
more accurate statistics and maps. 
Similar crop calendars of different crops (cotton, second crop 
maize, pepper) caused some classifying errors in the study area. 
Interna. 
On the 
and v 
backgre 
irrigatic 
affects 
differen 
differen 
groves 
as man 
training 
increase 
was als 
Wrong] 
manual 
4. Conc 
Agricul 
use infc 
use ma] 
of them 
land bu 
effectiv 
Remote 
date lan 
Is getti 
pioneeri 
effective 
This st 
LANDS 
current 
and accı 
Applied 
paramet 
able to c 
area. Th 
ture car 
study s| 
could be
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.