International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B7. Istanbul 2004
In the case that the phase angles are equal 5, #5, —> à = 0 the
trace of the tip of the electric field vector E is a straight line.
2.2 The Pauli decomposition approach
If a scatterer is illuminated by an electromagnetic plane
transmitted by an antenna, tfe incident wave at the scatterer is
given by
É" -hE? + VE" (11)
and that induces currents in the scatterer, which in turn reradiate
a scattered wave. In the far zone of the scatterer, the scattered
wave can be considered as a plane wave. The scattering process
can be modelled as a linear transformation, described by a
matrix S. The received field is then given by:
sopEnR epis $e] u
zen elt
vv 1
|
dé
The [S] matrix is referred to as Jones matrix (Jones, 1941), and
is a complex 2x2 matrix, containing information on the
scatterer. Sy, and S,, are called co-polar and Spy and Syn cross-
polar components. According to the reciprocity theorem, the
cross-polar components are equal.
Instead of the matrix notation, one may use a four element
complex vector k , which contains complete information on
the [S] matrix.
(13)
es Bis : Trace(|S]4)=[ky,k ka, k;1"
where Trace ([S]) is the sum of the diagonal elements of [S] and
V is a complete set of 2x2 complex basis matrices under a
hermitian inner product. Any complete orthonormal basis set of
four 2x2 matrices can be used. A basis which is more related to
the physics of wave scattering, the Pauli basis, is formed by the
Pauli spin matrices (Cloude, 1986).
|l o] 276 11. 10 fl
A 2 42| I |
1
|
1109 y 14e [9 [Y
The corresponding vector k, is then
1 y 7 1 1 , 1 3 Y Y 5
kp = [S hh + S , S hh 7 S , S hv + Su > (S, = S hv )l ( 13)
2
NZ
The Pauli decomposition approach assigns the appropriate
deterministic scattering mechanisms to each one of the four
elementary scattering matrices. The basic scattering
mechanisms are: isotropic surface, right wound helix and left
wound helix. Consequently, the Pauli matrices can be
interpreted as shown in table 2 (Hellmann, 1999).
Pauli matrix | Scattering type Interpretation
Surface,
sphere,cornerreflectors
odd-bounce
d
even-bounce dihedral
0
0 =]
K I | even-bounce 45? titled dihedral
| 0 titled 45°
0 =i cross-polariser Not existent for
0 backscattering
i
Table 2. Pauli matrices and their interpretation in the ( e e )
polarization basis
3. INTERPRETATION OF THE POLARIMETRIC
DATA
3.1 Interpretation of polarization signatures
A polarization signature is given by its 3-D presentation. X,P,Z
axes are assigned to the ellipticity angle x, the orientation angle
y, and the intensity of the co-polar or cross-polar components
of the radar signal (Z). As mentioned previously, the ellipticity
angle takes values in the interval [-45", 45°] and the orientation
angle in the interval [0, 180^]. Polarization signatures were
extracted for four land uses: urban, forest, vegetation, and
smooth surfaces (roads, runways, etc).
intensity for an ellipticity angle close to 45° and an orientation
angle close to 180° (figure 3). This means that polarization is
left hand circular (ie. the amplitudes of the co-polar
components Sp, and S,, are equal and the relative difference
angle close to 90°), and the orientation of the wave transmitted
changes 180° relative to the orientation of the wave received.
The above description fits well to the even-bounce scattering
type of horizontal dihedrals, which correspond to the building-
ground interaction that we encounter in urban areas.
The signature of the urban class presents high values of
In figure 3 we also observe very low values of intensity for an
ellipticity angle close to 0° and an orientation angle close to 0".
This means that in urban areas, polarization horizontally
oriented, which is the dipole like scattering case, is missed. The
low intensity values for an ellipticity angle close to -45° and an
orientation angle close to 0° denote the surface scattering type
of smooth surfaces (e.g. roads) found in the urban areas.
(a)
Figure 3. a) The co-polar and b) the cross-polar signature of the
urban area
Urban areas also have large cross-polar contribution (figure 3).
The range entire of values of the ellipticity angle is encountered
for high intensity of the cross-polar components and for an
orientation angle close to a) 29°, and b) 162°. This proves that
discontinuities of both scattering types, dihedrals and surfaces,
result in random polarization ellipses. Those with an orientation
282
Internati
INC E HG
compatil
in the er
little pre
polar co
orientati
In the fc
are obse
orientati
polarizat
high val
areas in
resulting
branches
dihedral
cell can
denotes |
arca whi
forest le:
dipoles.
polar in
orientatit
vertically
close to !
that of u
of high c
strongly
polar co
orientatic
Figure 4.
forest are
In the ve
intensity
angles cl
high ret
vertically
observe |
angle clc
surfaces
signature
Figure 5.
vegetatio
scatterers
Or verti
signature
presentec