Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 7)

  
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B7. Istanbul 2004 
  
  
  
Figure 6. Upper: Left- Landsat 7 Pan (15m) and MS (30m) 
43,2 band merge image (310 x 315 pixels); Right- 
classification result. Lower: Left- SPOT 5 Pan (5m) and XS 
(10m) 1,2,3 band merge image (929 x 943 pixels); Right- 
classification result. 
Figure 6 shows the results of unsupervised classification of 
Landsat 7 ETM+ and SPOT 5 HRG merged images. Landsat 
7 merged images are clustered into 5 clusters with ISODATA 
algorithms, then classified into three landscape/landcover 
classes. In case of SPOT 5 merged image, 9 clusters were 
generated using ISODATA algorithms, then categorise into 
three landscape/landcover classes. SPOT 5 merged image 
classification results in more detail information and more 
sharper object boundaries than Landsat 7 merged image 
classification. However, SPOT 5 merged image produces 
more spatial heterogeneity. Visual inspection and existing 
maps are used to examine the classification results. 
  
  
Result of Landsat 7 merge image 
classification (Pan and band 4,3,2 combination); Right: 
Result of SPOT 5 merge image classification (Pan and band 
12:3). 
Figure .7.: Left: 
Figure 7 shows the results of supervised classification of 
Landsat 7 and SPOT 5 merged images for linear feature and 
water body feature extraction. SPOT 5 merged image provide 
better accuracy in extracting channels and open water bodies. 
Very sharp boundaries of these features can be extracted. 
Due to low spatial resolution, Landsat 7 merged image don't 
300 
provide detail spatial information in comparison to SPOT 5 
merged image. The accuracy of classification is evaluated 
using visual inspection, field knowledge as well as existing 
map information. " 
S. CONCLUSIONS 
Satellite remote sensing images provide a valuable tool for 
identification and characterisation of wetland features and 
related land cover types. The synergistic use of images from 
different sensors with varied spatial and spectral resolutions 
have the potential for better extraction and classification of 
features. Extraction and classification of landscape and land 
cover features from multispectral images as well as different 
resolution merged images of Landsat 7 ETM+ and SPOT 5 
HRG sensors over the Okavango delta shows that 
classification accuracy and detail information content 
increases with increasing spatial resolution. Thematic 
information extraction was carried out using supervised and 
unsupervised classification to produce wetland landscape/ 
land cover classes for different spatial resolution data set. 
The results indicate that as spatial resolution increases, high 
spatial frequency landscape/land cover features are extracted 
in increasing detail. However, increase in spatial resolution 
also increases spatial heterogeneity. Further investigation 
need to be carried out by extracting texture features from 
panchromatic images and merging them with multispectral 
images. The segmentation and classification of texture 
merged image have potentiality to increase classification 
accuracy. 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
The author thanks the Department of Water Affairs of 
Botswana for highly effective support during field campaigns 
and ETH Zurich for financial support. 
REFERENCES 
Anderson, J.R., Hardy, E.E., Roach, J.T. and Witmer, RE, 
1976. A land use classification system for use with remote 
sensor data. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological 
Survey Professional Paper 964, Washington D.C. 
Ashton, P. and Neal, M., 2003. An Overview of key 
strategic issues in the Okavango basin. In: Tranboundary 
River, Sovereignty and Development: Hydropolitical Drivers 
in the Okavango River Basin, Turton, A., Ashton, P. and 
Cloete, E. (Eds.), AWIRU & Green Cross International, 
Pretoria & Geneva, pp. 31-63. 
Bailey, A., 1998. Okavango: Africa's Wetland Wilderness. 
Struik Publishers (Pty) Ltd., Cape Town, SA. 
Forstner, W., 1992. Fusing information in remote sensing. 
Invited paper, XVII ISPRS Congress, Washington D.C. 
Hughes, F.M.R., 1996. Wetlands. In: The Physical 
Geography of Africa, Adams, W.M., Goudie, A.S. and Orme, 
A.R. (Eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 267- 
286. 
  
International 
TC CL. 
McCarthy, T 
W.N. 1998. 
Botswana — 
African Jourr 
Pohl, C., 199 
different spa 
Photogramme 
Vol. 32, Part 
Pohl, C. and 
fusion in 
applications. 
pp. 823-854. 
Ross, K., 19 
Books, Londo 
Tao, Q., Le 
detection usin 
Data. In: P 
Convention  « 
Louisiana, | 
Photogramme 
364-373. 
Tittley, B., S 
integration of 
for coastal st 
Canada: A | 
Thematic Cor 
Coastal Envir: 
LA, pp. 1.225- 
UNDP, 1976. 
Water Resour 
Nations Food 
BOT/71/506, : 
Wulder, M., ^ 
Local maximu 
and basal area 
Sensing of Em
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.