International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B7. Istanbul 2004
Ke Predicted Class ae 7 ey
WT UI IV BR BQ SB NG JP
WT 223 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 98.67
Ul 0 852 1 55 0 43 3 5 88.84
IV 0 ] 522 2 1 0 0 0 99.24
BR 0 12 0 1402 0 3 3 21 97.20 a]
BQ 0 0 0 0 81 0 0 0 100
SB 0 19 0 2 0 327 25 5 86.51 ? De
NG 0 4 0 36 0 99 57 5 28.36
JP 0 8 0 45 0 47 12 63 36.00
Average accuracy (%) = 79.36 Overall Accuracy (%) = 88.46
Table 2. Classification matrix for the study area by using BPNN
KEY V
At Predicted Class ga ey
ABSTE
WT UI IV BR BQ SB NG JP
WT 222 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 98.23 Polarim
Ul 0 9 ] 4 0 29 0 8 0 8 95.3 ] proport
IV 0 6 520 0 0 0 0 0 98.86 synthes
BR 0 39 0 1367 0 4 0 31 94.86 derived
BQ 0 0 0 0 81 0 0 0 100 image «
SB 0 63 0 4 0 270 6 35 71.43 Rajski
NG 0 8 0 28 0 86 63 16 31.34 for text
JP 0 11 0 43 0 21 3 97 55.43 differer
Average accuracy (%) = 80.68 Overall Accuracy (%) = 88.64 probabi
inspect
Table 3. Classification matrix for the study area by using RBFC Eid :
slightly improve the classification accuracy compared with 5. ACKOWELDGEMENT accurac
BPNN. It can provide fuzzy classification results, more expand
appropriate in the case of mixed, intermediate, or complex The authors wish to thank the Earth Data Analysis Center
cover pattern pixels. The structure of this algorithm is ~~ (EDAC) at UNM for the Landsat data set and grateful help. We
composed of a limited number of fuzzy rules, which are also thank the support and discussion of students and staff of
interpretable and can be modified by human knowledge. the Autonomous Control Engineering (ACE) Center at UNM. The a
of the |
6. REFERENCES validity
classifi
Berenji, H. R. and Khedkar, P. S., 1993, "Clustering in Product networ
Space for Fuzzy Inference”, IEEE Fuzzy, pp. 1402-1407. scatteri
corresp
Duda, R. O., Hart, P. E. and Stork, D. G., 2000, Pattern inform:
Classification, Jone Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte. Ltd., New York, scatteri
2001. al., 19€
S"R^a
Foody, G.M. 1992, “A fuzzy sets approach to the inform:
representation of vegetation continua from remotely sensed that or
data: An example from lowland heath”, Photogramm. Eng. technic
Remote Sens., 58(2), pp. 443-451. accura
inform
Heermann, P.D. and Khazenic, Nahid, 1992, “ Classification of image
S nk Multispectral Remote Sensing Data using a Back-Propagation arisen
vds NX Neural Network", [EEE Trans. Geoscience and Remote used f
se Urban Impervi Sensing, 30(1), pp. 81-88. such €
[7] trrigated Vegetation (IV) LL] Barren (BR) ent
Bosque (BQ) 2 Shrubland (SB) Vassilas, N. and Charou, E., 1999, *A New Methodology for qum à
[1 Natural Grassland (NG) [HES Juniper (JP) Efficient Classification of Multispectral Satellite Images Using the pol
; ; QUSE Neural Network Techniques", Neural Processing Letters, 9, pp. the ap
Figure 3. RBFC classification result 35-43. vector
Wang, F., 1990, "Improving Remote Sensing Image Analysis put
Through Fuzzy Information representation,” Photogramm. Eng. TEE
20
Remote Sens., 56(8), pp. 1163-1169.