Istanbul 2004 
  
sed wavelet 
operty of the 
elected as the 
the denoised 
knowledge on 
ioise wavelet 
iture detector, 
ishable in the 
>. Particularly, 
ibutions is the 
More efficient 
computational 
orithm may be 
uch as image 
egrating these 
| using Neural 
.J., Dehghani, 
using wavelet 
pplications of 
eting, Denver, 
, 2001. Novel 
in Medical 
lournal, 20(8), 
for Bayesian- 
sing wavelet 
ntation, Ph.D. 
rough Wavelet 
ronic Imaging, 
Digital Image 
Pattern 
c., USA. 
lom Processes 
e Reduction in 
International 
laptive speckle 
'eoscience and 
, Pala, V. and 
Fusion with 
'eoscience and 
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B7. Istanbul 2004 
  
[12] Rioul, O. and Duhamel, P., 1992. Fast Algorithm for 
Discrete and Continuous Wavelet Transform, /EEE Trans. 
Inform. Theory Journal, 38(40), pp. 569-586. 
[13] Schwan, S., Wunderle, H. and Desnos, Y.-L., 1995. 
Evaluation of speckle filtered ERS-1 SAR images in Patagonia 
and Antarctica, European Space Agency Report, Earth 
Observation Quarterly (EOQ), No. 49. 
[14] Shi, Z. and Fung, K. B., 1994. A Comparison of Digital 
Speckle Filters, Proceedings of [GRASS 94, August, Pasadena. 
[15] Thitimajshima, P., Rangsanseri, Y. and Rakprathanporn, 
P., 1998. A Simple SAR Speckle Reduction by Wavelet 
Thresholding, Proceedings of the 19" Asian Conference on 
remote Sensing ACRS9S, pp. P-14-1—P-14-5, 
[16] Ulbay, F. T., Moore, R. K. and Fung, A. K., 1981. 
Microwave Remote Sensing, Artech House Inc.