International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B7. Istanbul 2004
e Industrial / commercial building
e Paved parking lots — few cars
e Neglected green spaces
Potential Brownfields sites 111
e Industrial / commercial building
e Neglected green spaces
So several cycles are run to detect potential Brownfields sites as
structured image objects. At this stage, structure groups without
buildings have not been successfully assigned. It shows that
Brownfields sites that are just covered with impervious surface
are very difficult to be traced and the scheme has to be im-
proved for this kind of surficial structure. The result is shown in
Figure 4 with the same subset as the image and classified result
above (see Figure. | and
3).
Figure 4. The black lines show correctly presented structure
groups. The black outlined area including hatch marks just
above the grouped brownfields marks where another
brownfields site is located but cannot be detected with the
presented method yet.
3. DISCUSSION
The land use classification of potential urban brownfields in the
study region produces promising results. Using Ikonos imagery
and working with an object-based classification approach, such
as the software program eCognition provides, are essential tools
to approach the investigation. There are a manifold factors that
impact the classification and its individual steps including the
timing of data acquisition (not only the phenological stage for
green spaces, but also the day of the week for the presence of
cars), the availability and quality of spatial test sites (point data
such as street addresses are insufficient, parcel boundaries in
terms of polygons are a prerequisite), and background
information on the brownfields test sites (timing of cleanup and
possible redevelopment). Some of the more distinct
classification errors are between shadow and dark roofs,
residential areas and urban parks. Shadows are also an
especially important consideration with the use of this high
spatial resolution imagery, particularly shadowing of urban
canopy into streets, alleys, and onto adjacent green spaces. As
no multitemporal imagery is available for this particular study,
the visual comparison with orthophotos or the knowledge of the
urban structure helped to improve the first classification step
(see Goetz, et al., 2003). To validate the assigned brownfields
sites for the available test sites a visual check and image
overlay can confirm. In order to improve the overall
classification scheme and to validate the data for the whole city,
ancillary GIS information such as data to urban green
infrastructure, protected lands, private conservation properties,
just to mention a few, need to be taken and compared with the
resulting structure type.
Investigations on potential urban brownfields sites by means of
remote sensing data is a brand new field with no comparing
projects. As the issue is compelling in many cities worldwide
and high resolution imagery gain weight for urban problem
solving it can be assumed that this issue is going to be tackled
more often and that technical improvements for their detection
will accelerate.
4. CONCLUSION
Brownfields sites have been recognized as important urban
features that need to be detected in early stages, cleaned up, and
redeveloped. Traditional approaches to mapping and monitoring
these critical sites rely on ownership information, active
neighbourhoods, realtors, to mention some, and are usually
recorded as point data. This is not very practical for planning
purposes, especially when the public issue goes beyond realtor
interests and stand for healthy, vibrant neighborhoods. Landsat
and ASTER data are simply not of sufficient spatial resolution
(30m, 15m) to adequately map brownfields sites. So very high
resolution imagery is needed to work in this field. The up-to-
date pros and cons of the presented remote sensing approach are
listed below.
Major advantages:
e Potential brownfields sites can be assigned for a
whole city.
e Once a step-wise approach is worked out it can easily
be modified for specific characteristics (e.g.
Brownfields in a virtual city are most likely to be
found next to water, or just below the local foothills,
or they always consist of an older pavement than
other lots do).
e Potentially assigned sites can be compared with
available GIS data for a city.
e Verified sites can be marked in maps and checked by
local authorities.
Major disadvantages:
e Remote sensing only offers a bird's eye perspective
on a critical and challenging issue.
e Very high resolution data sets need to be available.
e There is no single assignment for such sites and their
detection is highly knowledge-based.
e The detection is not operational yet and still part of
basic research.
464
Intern
Refer
Barns
recogi
land c
21019
Bauer
classi!
GeoB.
Goetz
EU
cover,
mid-A
pp. 1S
Howl:
Canto
Autun
Johns:
satelli
Vol. €
Refer
Donn:
Sensi
Lond
Refer
Baatz
M., Si
Guide
5.1.
Ikono
[magi
S23 /
This
Max-]
the C«
USA.