Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 7)

  
  
  
  
  
  
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B7. Istanbul 2004 
  
The accuracy of tree top measurement by LIDAR depends on 
the accuracy of DSM and DEM. Therefore, we compared the 
DSM and DEM by the resolution, and discussed the factors that 
give influence on the accuracy of tree height measurement. 
Table 5 shows the correlation coefficient between the high- 
resolution data and low-resolution data of DSM points group 
and DEM points group at the study sites. As a result, the 
correlation coefficient of DSM was 0.834 while that of DEM 
was 0.995, and therefore, DSM had slightly lower correlation 
coefficient. As the correlation coefficient of DEM was very 
high, it is considered that there is no large difference in the 
process of generating DEM from raw data by the difference of 
resolution. 
When the comparison was made by tree types, it was species 
and density of trees that showed large difference between DSM 
and DEM. By the species of tree, the correlation coefficient of 
DSM showed low value (0.372) in case of the coniferous trees, 
and by the difference of density, that of DSM was showed a 
slightly lower value (0.744). This is a tendency coincident with 
the tree height measuring characteristics described before, and 
it was suggested that the characteristics of DSM was reflected 
on the characteristics of tree height measurement. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
ET N ec 
DSM DEM 
Species b 25,918 0.836 0.996 
s C 2,806 0.372 0.818 
Stratum: 4,620 0.928 0.930 
u 24,104 0.813 0.994 
Density d 14,342 0.870 0.997 
14,382 0.744 0.827 
All 28,724 0.834 0.995 
  
N: number of LIDAR points, C.C: correlation coefficient, T.T: 
tree types (b=broad-leaf, c=coniferous, m=multi-storied forest, 
u=uniform forest, h: high, |: low, d=dense, s=sparse) 
Table 5. Correlation coefficient of DSM and DEM of 
different resolution 
  
0000000000000000000088 
— n — Meters 
200 0 200 400 600 
  
Figure 5. Difference of DSM between high-resolution data 
and low-resolution data 
  
Figure 6. Picture of site A 
516 
Figure 5 shows the difference between DSM of high-resolution 
data and that of low-resolution data. The areas where the high- 
resolution data show lower value are indicated in blue color and 
where the high-resolution data show higher value are indicated 
in red color. In general, it is known from this figure that there 
are many more areas where the high-resolution data show lower 
value. Especially, large estrangement was observed between 
both DSMs at site A which is sparse Zolkova trees (Figure 6). 
5. CONCLUSION 
In this study, we measured the tree height at the urban forests 
using LIDAR data of different resolutions, and discussed the 
relation between error and tree types and the measuring 
characteristics by the difference of resolution. As a result, it has 
become clear that LIDAR tends to measure the tree height 
lower than actual height as the characteristics that does not 
depend upon the resolution, and this tendency is conspicuous 
especially in the case of coniferous trees, and also that the 
accurate measurement is difficult in the case of low trees in 
multi-storied forest because the laser is intercepted by the tall 
tree story. It has also become clear that the accuracy of tree top 
measurement by the resolution is greatly influenced by the 
species and density of trees and high-resolution data which 
have higher probability of tree top irradiation provide the higher 
accuracy in the case of coniferous trees while the low- 
resolution data which has low transmission rate through 
branches show the higher measuring accuracy in case of low 
density forest. These measuring characteristics of tree top are 
reflected by DSM, and it was recognized that the measuring 
accuracy by LIDAR data does not necessarily depend solely on 
the resolution. 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 
We hereby express our hearty thanks to General Manager, Mr. 
Toshio Sekiguchi, and Superintendent, Mr. Yoshihiro Yada, of 
Koganei Park Management Office, Incorporated Foundation 
Tokyo Metropolitan Park Association. 
REFERENCES 
Friedlaender, H. and Koch, B., 2000. First experience in the 
application of laser scanner data for the assessment of vertical 
and horizontal forest structures. [International Archives of 
Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 33(B7). 
Handa, M. and Teshirogi, J., 2002. Urban forest for global 
warming prevention - Towards sustainable community - 
Urban Green Technology, 47, pp.17-21. 
Naesset, E., 1997. Determination of mean tree height of forest 
stands using airborne laser scanner data. /SPRS Journal of 
Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 52, pp.49-56. 
Setojima, M., Akamatsu, Y., Funahashi, M., Imai, Y. and 
Amano, M., 2002. Measurement of forest area by airborne laser 
scanner and its applicability. Journal of the Japan Society of 
Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 41(2), pp.15-26. 
Yamagata, Y., Oguma, H., Sekine, H. and Tsuchida, S., 2002. 
The role of remote sensing for monitoring the carbon sink 
activities. Journal of the Remote Sensing Society of Japan, 
22(5), pp.494-509.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.