Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 7)

International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B7. Istanbul 2004 
  
both in principal purpose and data characteristics. Such video 
surveys tend to be (i) unplanned in terms of data acquisition 
scheme, (ii) focus on highly damaged areas at the expense of 
complete coverage, and (iii) produce uncalibrated data with 
comparatively low spatial resolution. Commonly used devises 
used are analogue or digital BetaCams (360 and 720 vertical 
lines, respectively) or HDTV (High Definition Television) with 
1920 columns. All PAL-compatible systems have 576 lines. In 
addition to the news media, law enforcement agencies are also 
increasingly using rapid airborne surveys following urban 
disasters, where also more sophisticated cameras that acquire 
infrared or thermal imagery are used. 
While the acquisition of video data is straightforward, the use of 
such data poses challenges, in that established image analysis 
methods can only be used within limits. Reasons for that 
include the oblique nature of the data, an unstable imaging 
platform, frequent changes in focal length and, consequently, 
image scale during data acquisition. In addition they frequently 
lack camera orientation and location information. 
The 1995 Kobe earthquake led to efforts to use non-calibrated 
data for damage assessment, partially fuelled by delayed 
overpasses of satellites following the event (Landsat TM: 7 
days; JERS: 20 days; Yamazaki, 2001). Improving on previous 
work by Hasegawa et al. (2000b) that only used visual image 
interpretation, as well as on analysis of multi-temporal satellite 
data on grounds of impracticality and data unavailability, 
Hasegawa et al. (2000a) explored quantitative analysis methods 
applied to noncalibrated imagery. Training data of areas 
showing 3 levels of damage were extracted from individual 
HDTV frames and used for a classification. Similar methods 
were applied by Mitomi et a/. (2000) on earthquakes in Taiwan 
and Turkey, and by Yamazaki (2001) on the 2001 Gujarat 
disaster. All studies applied threshold values based on training 
data to identify damaged areas with varying success, and all 
were applied to individual video frames only, limiting the 
practical value of the approach. 
1.3 Research aims 
A number of issues are addressed in this paper: (1) given the 
limited resolution and, therefore, detail of standard video data, 
compounded by further quality loss resulting from data format 
conversions, we investigated the potential to improve image 
quality (in terms of higher signal/noise ratio), using a stacking 
method that incorporates adjacent frames, as well as with a 
synthetic aperture approach similar to the one described by 
Gornyi and Latypov (2002); (i) we applied a damage 
assessment method to a video stream instead of individual 
frames based on damage training area characteristics; (iii) we 
used imagery with encoded GPS data, and relative camera 
azimuth and inclination information. We extracted this auxiliary 
information automatically to aid in the mapping of the 
flightpath as well as spatial registration of the damaged areas. 
The overall aim of the project reported on here is to provide a 
video processing environment that combines the above 
elements, and that allows near-real time processing of video 
data to detect damage. Results can be displayed related to 
geocoded pre-event and auxiliary data, in 2 or 3D as applicable. 
An important difference to previous work is that our study deals 
with an industrial accident marked by a radial damage pattern 
quite different from earthquake damage. Further improvements 
to our processing environment are planned to make it flexible 
581 
enough to deal with any type of urban disaster damage. The 
event addressed in this study is briefly described below. 
1.4 The 2000 Enschede fireworks disaster 
On 13 May 2000, a series of explosions occurred at a fireworks 
factory located within a residential area in Enschede, the 
Netherlands. An area in excess of 40 ha was affected, 22 people 
killed, and close to 500 buildings severely damaged or 
destroyed. The force of the explosions led to complete 
obliteration of buildings close to the site of the factory, while 
damage severity rapidly declined towards the furthest affected 
structures, approximately 1 km from ground zero (van Westen 
and Hofstee, 2001; Figure 1). 
Video image acquisition by the police began approximately two 
hours after the disaster, and was repeated on the following days 
and augmented by high-resolution vertical aerial photographs 
12 days later. These data, however, were not used for the actual 
damage assessment, which was instead based on ground-based 
surveys. Disaster response was hindered by outdated map 
material. Incidentally, a planned aerial survey of Enschede at a 
scale of 1:18,000 was carried out just 4 hours before the disaster 
occurred, providing reference data that could have been, but 
were not, used in the disaster response phase. 
RTE 
"Enschede! 
  
   
    
     
   
AR 
ft % 4 
~ Netherlands + 
: i 
| Belgium, i Germany: 
  
    
  
  
Figure 1. Illustration showing (a) location of Enschede, (b) an 
overview map of the disaster site, and (c) a photo taken during 
the explosion of the fireworks factory. 
2. DATA AND METHODOLOGY 
2.1 Data used 
A comprehensive database related to the disaster was compiled, 
comprising of pre- and post-event, space- and airborne, still and 
video imagery, in addition to pre- and post-disaster vector data. 
The principal data sources used for this paper are optical video 
data acquired by the Dutch National Police Aviation Branch on 
May 13 and 15, as well as a pre-event Ikonos MS reference 
imagery acquired on 3 April 2000. Video data were captured 
with a Sony-HAD camera with 720x576 pixels, as well as an 
Agema Thermovision 1000 that acquired data between 8-12 
um. 
2.2 Methodology 
The following principal steps were carried out in this study: 
(1) Investigation of frame quality enhancement 
using AstroStack (www.innostack.com) and a 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.