A GENERAL REVIEW OF THE DEFORMATION MONITORING TECHNIQUES AND A
CASE STUDY: ANALYSING DEFORMATIONS USING GPS/LEVELLING
S. Erol* *, B. Erol®, T. Ayan*
? [TU, Civil Engineering Faculty, Geodesy Division, 34469 Maslak Istanbul, Turkey - (erol, bihter, ayan)@itu.edu.tr
Commission VII, WG VII/5
KEY WORDS: Geodesy, Engineering, Structure, Disaster, Monitoring, Analysis
ABSTRACT:
Being sure is very important that the movements of an engineering structure, which serves the human life of today's modern world,
are exhibiting safe behaviours. So, a lot of deformation monitoring studies for determining and analysing different kinds of
engineering structures such as high-rise buildings, dams, bridges, viaducts, industrial complexes etc., are implemented. During these
studies, the used measurement techniques and systems, which could be geodetic or non-geodetic, are determined considering the
type of the structure of which deformations will be monitored, its environmental conditions and expected accuracy from the
measurements. As related the used monitoring techniques, the deformation measurement equipments are varied. Also according to
professions who use the deformation monitoring techniques, these techniques and instrumentation have traditionally been
categorized in to two groups: geodetic surveys, which include conventional (terrestrial such as precise levelling measurements, angle
and distance measurements etc.), photogrammetric (terrestrial, aerial and digital photogrammetry), satellite (such as Global
Positioning System-GPS, InSAR), and some special techniques; geotechnical/structural measurements, using lasers, tiltmeters,
strainmeters, extensometers, joint-meters, plumb lines, micrometers etc. In this paper, some of these deformation measurement
techniques which are thought as more important and mostly used by the geodesy specialists will be reviewed. The importance and
need of carrying out the deformation measurements periodically in engineering structures will be emphasised.
Besides, a case study that is about implementing the deformation analysis of a large viaduct using GPS and Precise Levelling
measurements will be discussed here. As it is well known, engineering structures (such as in this viaduct) are subject of deformation
due to factors such as changes of ground water level, tidal phenomena, tectonic phenomena etc. In this study, the design, execution
and analysis of deformations in a high-way viaduct are going to be mentioned in detailed explanations as an example of
implementing the two geodetic techniques in deformation monitoring of large engineering structures. During the study, the control
network points were positioned with GPS measurement technique and height differences were supported with precise levelling
measurements. As the result of measurement campaigns, the X, Y, Z cartesian coordinates and height differences were determined
from the GPS measurements and precise levelling measurements respectively. Later on, deformation analysis using the height
differences according to provided data from the GPS and the data from the precise levelling were carried out separately. Then, the
3D deformation analysis using the GPS measurements data was carried out too. Founded results will be given in the paper.
measurements, are easier to adapt for automatic and continuous
monitoring than conventional instruments of geodetic
Engineering structures (such as dams, bridges, viaducts, high measurements. Geodetic techniques have traditionally been
1. INTRODUCTION
rise buildings, etc.) are subject to deformation due to factors
such as changes of ground water level, tidal phenomena,
tectonic phenomena, etc. Monitoring and analyzing
deformations of these structures constitutes a special branch of
Geodesy Science. There are several techniques for measuring
the deformations. These can be grouped mainly into two as
geodetic and non-geodetic techniques.
Each main measurement technique has its own advantages and
drawbacks. Geodetic techniques, through a network of points
interconnected by angle and/or distance measurements, usually
supply a sufficient redundancy of observations for the statistical
evaluation of their quality and for a detection of errors. They
give global information on the behaviour of the deformable
structure while the non-geodetic techniques give localized and
locally disturbed information without any check unless
compared with some other independent measurements. On the
other hand, the instruments, which are used in non-geodetic
used mainly for determining the absolute displacements of
selected points on the surface of the object with respect to some
reference points that are assumed to be stable. Non-geodetic
techniques have mainly been used for relative deformation
measurements within the deformable object and its
surroundings (Anonym, 2002).
The major motivation of this study is geodetic techniques in
monitoring deformations of engineering structures and
analyzing. In determining deformations according to geodetic
techniques constitutes terrestrial measurement techniques or
space based positioning techniques and/or combination of both
techniques. Until the very beginning of 1980’s, the
deformations in engineering structures had been determined just
using conventional measurement techniques. After that, by
starting to use GPS measurement technique in geodetic and
surveying applications, this very precise satellite based
* Corresponding author. This is useful to know for communication with the appropriate person in cases with more than one author.
622
Interna
positio
measut
GPS te
3-D [x
positio
compo
predon
atmosp
2001).
Theref
measur
special
GPS ol
such a
measut
baselin
height
In sor
insuffi
suppor
techniq
In this
using
implen
GPS 1
suppor
measur
height
measur
Later «
accordi
precise
deform
carried
founde
deform
2.0
As it
techniq
geodeti
can als
found s
measur
GPS:
conven
stations
the sel
surveys
under
measur
can be
recent
for the
minute:
Photog
more :
coordin