Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 7)

  
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B7. Istanbul 2004 
acquire, according to which kinds of topographic product must 
be yielded. 
Assumed as given the long-range TLS to be used (the 
possibility of selecting between more than one instruments is a 
chance that seldom happens!), 6 metrological parameters of 
TLS may affect the result of the survey (see lavarone & Martin, 
2003): 
e horizontal and vertical FoVs; 
e range measurement accuracy; 
e horizontal and vertical scan resolutions; 
e size of beam-spot in the range of involved distances. 
We would like to proposed in next sub-paragraphs a workflow 
for data acquisition strategy in case of a typical survey of a 
geological site. 
2.3.1 Preliminary site investigations: Disregarding all 
concernes involved in the geological analysis of the site 
(existing geological maps, evident indications and damages, 
formulation of ground displacement hypotesis) and focusing on 
the merely geometric survey, available large scale maps of the 
interested area could be very helpful for the laser scanning 
survey design. Possibly, maps should be integrated by 
orthophotos and a DTM, in order to have a complete look over 
the study area. 
Collected information are needed to define the area to survey 
and the area where TLS could be stationed. Furthermore, in 
case the data acquisition has to be repeated in future for 
monitoring purpose, some stable areas must be localized in 
order to place some monuments to materialize a permanent 
GRS. 
2.3.2 Positioning of TLS stations: A survey design should 
be first define positions of TLS stations, so that the whole 
object coverage at requested spatial resolution and accuracy 
could be guaranteed. To this aim it is necessary to compute the 
ground resolution of each scan, given the TLS stand-point and 
the position of the area to survey. Obviously, ground resolution 
may change inside a same scan, depending on polar coordinates 
(d, @, 0) of each measured points and on horizontal and vertical 
scan resolution (Ag, A40). We introduce two relations which 
allows to compute horizontal and vertical linear footprints (ry, 
ry) as function of the above mentioned parameters. In order to 
make a rough simplification of the real configuration, we 
assumed a simplified terrain model consisting in a plane tilted 
by a yangle, namely the vertical attitude used by geologysts. 
Referring to Figure 1 for the meaning of symbols, horizontal 
footprint ry can be computed by formula (1), where also 
expression as function of the horizontal range d, is given; 
during survey planning, the horizontal distance dy, can be 
measured from maps instead of the slope distance d. 
à Ke , d'Ap dip d,Ap 
sin A2. a 2.0 7f. e (1) 
3 
cos Q 2 cosp 2  cosp sinOcose 
  
Lf 
According to Figure 1, the vertical footprint ry can be computed 
as follows (both real and horizontal ranges have been 
considered): 
d ^0 d, A0 
= (2) 
: 2cos(y + 0) — 2sinOcos(y * 0) 
n 
Thank to the proposed formulas, for each scan position the 
ground resolution can be computed and the requirements 
needed for the information extraction verified. 
  
  
HORIZONTAL PLANE 
x 
- : 
- 
-— 
—— 
- 
-— 
- 
- 
- 
-— 
— 
- 
- 
-—— ———" 
- — 
- -— 
an 
  
  
VERTICAL PLANE 
-—— 
-—— 
- 
- 
_ 
— 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
—— 
- 
-— 
-— 
——— 
—— 
-—-— 
-——— 
- 
- — — 
—— — 
4 
M hp 
TLS stand-point 
   
  
  
  
Figure 1: geometric scheme for computing footprints. 
Once the coverage of the ground has been checked, a rough 
prevision of the amount of data to collect has to be done. One of 
the main open problems in today’s laser scanning technique is 
dealing with a very huge dimension of point-clouds, which get 
difficult the data processing. Even though a resampling of each 
scan could be performed after the acquisition on the field, the 
best solution would be to directly carry out the data collection 
at a suitable resolution. This strategy will result in a reduction 
of the acquisition time as well. 
2.3.3 Control point position and shape: According to 
considerations made at par. 2.2, we consider the registration 
method completely based on GCPs as the only which may 
guarantee a sufficient accuracy in surveys for geological 
investigations. This approach needs the positioning of at least 4- 
5 control points for each planned scan. Even though the direct 
topographic measurement of all CPs would be the most reliable 
way (so that all points would play as GCPs), in practise this 
approach might be largely time-wasting. Moreover, some CPs 
could be needed in positions where their direct topographic 
measurement by a total station of GPS would not be possible. In 
case scans are linked to each other by TPs, these must be 
positioned to avoid instability and bad determinability of 
orientations. If the TLS allows an horizontal FoV of 360°, it is 
possibile to put some GCPs also behind the stand-points, 
perhaps in poisitions far from the landslide area where GPS 
measurement can be carried out. 
m If more acquisitions are planned at 
different times for monitoring a landslide 
evolution, some fixed GCPs should be 
placed. We consider the permanent 
positioning of a target as a not very 
reliable solution for re-positioning of 
GRS at each survey time. Indeed, GCPs 
near the landslide area could be not 
stable, while GCSs in external positions 
could not be enough to give a strong 
constraint. A suitable solution would be to 
place some monuments in stable sites 
outside the area directly involved in the 
ground displacement. Starting from these 
  
Figure2: ! T | us 
reflective points, coordinates of required GC Ps 
target for LR could be measured at each survey time by 
TLS topographic methods. 
applications Last but not least, the structure of targets 
with GPS adopted as CPs is a critical aspect which 
antenna should be accurately considered. Yet TLS 
mounted producers usually proposed their own 
targets (plane or 3D reflectors, such as 
710 
  
Inter. 
  
cilinc 
invol 
topog 
carrie 
TPs, 
mour 
to fix 
2.4 | 
This 
comp 
the | 
positi 
cover 
check 
this, 
resolu 
modif 
out di 
Anotl 
proce: 
acqui: 
Acqui 
range 
color 
Digita 
indep: 
camer 
corris; 
image 
carrie 
et al., 
respec 
In bot 
by ma 
and tl 
calibre 
points 
25 D 
Data p 
In the | 
derivec 
registre 
devote 
we bri 
the reg 
geolog
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.