Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 7)

il 2004 
vation 
ym the 
ing as 
RUTA 
astline 
3S over 
RDAS 
or the 
ninary 
? Steps 
ialysis 
spatial 
or the 
cening 
esides 
of the 
nap in 
id. 
of the 
ion of 
rt and 
eters, 
ystem 
e data 
ysical 
of fast 
spatial 
d map 
  
2 
TA) 
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B7. Istanbul 2004 
  
  
  
: 2000 (Lando ETM 
rn E 199? (Ludei TM; 
|| 77 1990 (Lande 
  
^ 1580 (Mag) 
  
  
  
  
Scara 1 : 5 606 
  
  
Figure 4. Shoreline evolution over 20 years as extracted from 
Landsat data. 
3.1. The changes of the Romanian costal zone 
The Rumanian coastal zone can be divided from the 
geomorphological point of view, in two main units. The 
northem unit and the southern unit. In the northern zone prevails 
the low relief, characteristic to the Danube Delta, with narrow 
blokes. Transported by the strong currents of that zone, the 
sands built a barrier in the Sf. Gheorghe zone. These barriers 
closed the Razelm Lake. The sediments form the modern times 
are made mainly from quartz sand (7096 silicon). Heavy metals 
do not go over 3%. The transport of sediments that come from 
the regions north to the Danube Delta have higher silicon 
content, of almost 9096. The evolution of the delta zone started 
during the quarternary and was strongly influenced by the 
modifications into the sea level of that time. 
The Delta was formed during the period of the sea level retreats 
through the alternate developing of the river Danube, each 
developing it's own deltaic structure. Presently there are three 
Danube branches active and only Chilia is still developing it's 
own deltaic structure. The other coastal sectors are retracting, 
being influenced by the decrease in the Danube sediments over 
the last century. The long term studies shown a decrease of the 
Black Sea level of almost 2.5mm/year in the Vama Veche 
region, while other measurements evidentiated the rising of the 
sea level of 1.2 to 1.8 mm/year at Sulina and almost 3.3mm/year 
at Constanta. The ground in the delta zone is going down with 
1.3-2mm/year because of the sediments phenomenon and the 
zone's tectonics. The tide phenomenon in the Romanian coast 
not is easily detected because of other fluctuations. The other 
fluctuations of the Black Sea level are caused by the dynamics 
in the river's debits that go into the Sea, modifications of the 
water flow in the Bosfor straits and the precipitations/ 
evaporations relation in that zone. One of the most important 
factors that influence the hydrological budget of the Black Sea 
is the volume of water, which goes through the rivers that form 
the hydrological pool of the Black Sea. The Danube River has 
the highest volume between April and June. The building of 
many dams over the Danube River and it's affluents 
considerably reduced the transport of sediments. 
Another important factor is the winds and waves regime. The 
average wind speed in the NV region of the Black Sea is 
between 6.5 and 5m/s. The main directions of the wind is N,V 
and S, a greater weight having the NV direction. During the 
summer months the predominant direction is S-SE. The storms 
have a predominant N direction, with an average wind speed of 
9.8m/s, during a period of time of 8 to 22 hours. There is a 5096 
probability that aver one year to have waves higher than 0.2m. 
The retreat of the coastline with almost 10m/year is more 
obvious along the Sakhalin barrier and south to Ciotca, and also 
between Portita and Chitiuc. Then the coastline advances 
immediately south of Sulina where it is accompanied by the 
presence of some very shallow waters. See figure 5 
781 
4. Sources of error in change detection 
A first approach to classify errors in environmental change 
analysis with remote sensed data is dividing the sources of error 
in instrumental errors and method errors. A more detailed 
description of errors can include the data acquisition errors, data 
processing, data analysis and data conversion errors . 
In the process of error assessment, several errors can occur: 
positional errors, registration, differences, data entry error for 
reference data, interpretation and delineation of reference data, 
reference data and remote sensed data are not simultaneously 
collected, classification errors. The results are affected by 
different errors, at different levels and the positional and the 
thematic information obtained from the two data sets is not of 
the same precision. From the merging of the two data sets will 
result an unknown precision of the final product. 
4.1 Positioning error 
The resulted thematic classification assigned to each identified 
class a spatial location on the image. During this process a 
generalization operation is performed. The class boundaries are 
also affected by misclassification of the marginal pixels. 
Horizontal accuracy for map products at scales greater than 1:20 
000 must be less than 1096 of tested points to have a greater 
error of 0.85cm, measured at the map's scale. For maps at scales 
1:20 000 or smaller, the admissible error is 0.51 mm. The 
horizontal components are defining standard position error in 
which are contained 9096 of point coordinate discrepancies. 
Another accuracy criteria is the map standard deviation. 
1 
   
A 
Ya, s ~~. 1857 
| 1910 
1962 
v 2008 = 
Bratul Chilia al e 
& 
© 
S ; Ty 
Wim NN 
A i910 
«Hu 
: 2002 
u 
LEGEND 
+ Lp noie ia vet 
non 1887 
---1910 
— 1962 
— 20603 
* R62 Control points 1962 
SCALE 
6 $ 10 15 20km 
mmi —dmeni— 3i 
Figure 5. The dynamics of the littoral corridor between year 
1857 and 2003. 
Standard deviation for tested points must not have a value over 
the value calculated : 
0,5 
d= 5 | (1) 
i=11" 
where d = standard deviation 
li= point error 
n = number of points 
  
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.