International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B7. Istanbul 2004
\
slope. Together with the moderate correlation eith the CBVD
and low slope it is suggested that the KBS facilitates
identification of a class beyond its internal variability
(heterogeneity) and its similarity to other classes (lack of
uniqueness).
100% |, oio EI QM
z | 1
2 = € | |
m R? - 0.7218 sil
Q = » | |
> = n | |
o | |
5 75% " 2 bas |
o | |
= o e |
S y = 0.7358x + 0.2597 | |
= 50% | R? = 0.9416 E
= | |
2 | o US-CEM (%) |
S oo m KBS-CEM (%) |
25% — ES
|
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% /
Uniqueness Index - PHBL |
|
Figure 4: Relationships between uniqueness index (PHBL)
and classification efficiency measures (CEM) of US and
KBS classifications.
6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
The use of KBSs based on evidential reasoning, for land-cover
mapping based on remotely-sensed images is spreading widely.
Secondary products of such classification techniques are the
CBVs which are unique features of the Dempster-Shafer
algorithm. However, despite the major role of CBVs in KBS
classification decisions, their analysis has received little,
attention in the literature. In the present study relationships
between CBVs of the different classes and the
accuracy/reliability of their corresponding classifications were
investigated. The CBVs were found to be good indicators of the
level of classification complexity on both the pixel and the class
scales. In this framework we added two new parameterizations
for the CBV distribution: PHBL and CBVD, two parameters
which contribute to the analysis of the heterogeneity and the
uniqueness of a class.
Correlations were found between US and KBS classification
efficiency and levels of heterogeneity and uniqueness of a class.
However, US classification efficiency was much more affected
by the heterogeneity and uniqueness levels of a class as referred
by five times higher slopes of the trend-lines. In other words,
the KBS facilitates identification of a class beyond its internal
variability (heterogeneity) and its similarity with other classes
(lack of uniqueness). Finally, contrary to the intuitive
expectation, CBVs do not indicate the reliability of
classification. Low CBVs are indicative of complex situations
or difficulties but do not necessarily imply that they cannot be
resolved by the KBS.
7. AKNOWLEDGEMENT
We thank Arik Solomon and Eyal Sarid for realizing the
Gordon-Shortliffe algorithm. We thank also to Dr. Victor
Alchanatis for his helpful comments.
8. REFERENCES
Adinarayana, J., and Rama-Krishna, N. .1996. Integration of
multi-seasonal remotely sensed images for improved land use
classification of hilly watershed using geographical information
systems. International journal of remote sensing, 17, pp. 1679-
1688.
Cohen, Y., 2000. Knowledge-based crop recognition by data
sources integration in a Mediterranean environment. PhD
Dissertation. Israel: Bar-Ilan University.
Cohen, Y., and Shoshany, M., 2002. A national knowledge-
based crop recognition in Mediterranean environment.
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and
Geoinformation, 4, pp. 75-87.
Gordon, J., and Shortliffe, E. H., 1985. A method for
managing evidential reasoning in hierarchial hypothesis space.
Artificial Intelligence, 26, pp. 323-357.
Kontoes, C. C., Wilkinson, G. G., Burrill, A., Goffredo, S., and
M 'egier, J., 1993. An experimental system for the integration of
GIS data in knowledge-base image-analysis for remote sensing
of agriculture. /nternational Journal of GIS, 7, pp. 247-262.
Peddle, D. R., 1995. Knowledge formulation for supervised
evidential classification. Photogrammetric engineering and
remote sensing, 61, pp. 409-417.
Shafer, G., 1976. A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton,
New Jersey: Princeton University Press. pp. 302.
Wilkinson, G. G., and M'egier. J., 1990. Evidential reasoning
in a classification hierarchy a potential method for integrating
image classifiers and expert system rules based on geographic
context. International journal of remote sensing, 11, pp. 1963-
1968.
920
OB
D
ABS!
Three
for qu
just b.
these
in col
more
3D sti
and si
of the
for tw
recogi
The ic
(objec
operat
for r
(Balts:
Brunn
et. Al.
Jaynes
Brenn:
metho
and ju
more
extract
vaguer
makes
intensi
The o
expres:
proced