Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 7)

2004 
  
juares 
better 
|O and 
beam 
ng the 
2 load 
ealing 
cisely 
was 
al test 
for all 
, there 
the cy 
La 196 
he test 
id case 
critical 
on the 
quired, 
umeters 
similar 
dinates 
eh the 
nber of 
n.the 
mputed 
ws the 
Eq. 5). 
revised 
e using 
10 have 
|, 4,9 
pared 
etter for 
eometry 
im from 
ingle of 
- of the 
96°17". 
yutdoors 
offset to 
um tops) 
of 268 
| points) 
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B7. Istanbul 2004 
  
  
“Epoch Maximum Number B Revised Eliminated 
vertical of parameter model parameters 
deflection Targets RMS RMS 
(mm) (mm) (mm) 
1 2.1 12 1:1 +1.3 C30 
2 4.1 12 +0.9 +0.9 
3 6.0 12 x37 137 
4 8.0 12 t1 $1.7 C30 
5 10.0 12 +2.4 +2.4 
6 12.9 12 +23 x C30. Aj 
7 0.9 11 252.1 +21 
8 4.1 12 +12 +12 
9 8.3 12 +2.0 +21 C30 
10 13.2 B x32 +2.8 C30s A10 
[1 28.8 12 127 +28 C30 
12 48.3 11 £3.3 +35 
Total RMS +2.4 +2.4 
  
Table 2. Differences of vertical deflections between the LMS- 
7210 and photogrammetry. 
Most of the commercially available TLSs have a sufficiently 
large vertical field of view permitting them to be positioned 
high above the test structure or whatever the case may be. 
Potentially, the TLS does not need to be levelled. 
Measurements would be benefited by tilting the TLS towards 
the structure. The critical factor is to maintain a stable 
placement so that the TLS remains stationary for the duration of 
testing. Despite the necessity of a thoughtful set up, both 
experiments showed that it was still possible to successfully 
measure deformation even though the imaging geometry was 
suboptimal and scan data were scarce. 
7. CONCLUSIONS 
An analytical modelling approach was developed to detect and 
measure vertical deformation. It involved representing the beam 
with a compound polynomial containing parameters that have a 
sound physical origin derived from first principles of beam 
deflection mechanics. The solutions were found to suffer from 
high parameter correlations. 
Statistical testing of the significance of the estimated parameters 
in the polynomial models proved an effective method of 
removing insignificant parameters. All timber beam solutions 
passed the F-tests. Testing of the parameters in the concrete 
beam example revealed parameters that were not a significant 
influence in the model. A revised model was created for those 
cases and was compared to the photogrammetric benchmark 
data. It was shown that the statistical testing of parameters could 
be successfully used to remove redundant parameters without 
compromising the accuracy of the model. These tests were 
conducted, however, in relatively controlled conditions. 
This modelling avoids the arbitrary nature inherent in some 
other methods, such as gridding (Gordon et al., 2003b). The 
sub-millimetre results for the Cyra Cyrax 2500 place it in the 
Same accuracy league as close-range photogrammetry (at least, 
for non-metric cameras). The perceived main advantage of 
Photogrammetry over TLS is its high precision. The additional 
advantages of TLS. however, include full surface representation 
959 
(as opposed to a few targets) and also a single set up geometry 
that does not have an inherently weak dimension (as 
photogrammetry has in depth). Furthermore, the reflectorless 
nature of TLS does not require targets except for validation. 
8. REFERENCES 
Beer, F.P. and Johnston, E.R., 1992. Mechanics of Materials. 
McGraw-Hill Book Company, Berkshire, England, 738 pages. 
Fraser, C.S. and Edmundson, K.L. 2000. Design and 
Implementation of a Computational Processing System for Off- 
Line Digital Close-Range Photogrammetry. /SPRS Journal of 
Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 55(2), pp. 94 - 104. 
Gordon, S.J. and Lichti, D.D., 2004. Terrestrial Laser Scanners 
with a Narrow Field of View: The Effect on 3D Resection 
Solutions. Survey Review, 37(292), In press. 
Gordon, S.J, Lichti, D.D., Chandler, L, Stewart, M.P. and 
Franke, J., 2003a. Precision Measurement of Structural 
Deformation using Terrestrial ‘Laser Scanners. In: Optical 3D 
Methods, Zurich, Switzerland, 22 - 25 September, 8 pages. 
Gordon, S.J., Lichti, D.D. and Stewart, M.P., 2003b. Structural 
Deformation Measurement using Terrestrial Laser Scanners. In: 
IHth International FIG Symposium on Deformation 
Measurements, Santorini Island, Greece, 25 - 28 May, 8 pages. 
Jacobsen, K., 1982. Attempt at Obtaining the Best Possible 
Accuracy in Bundle Block Adjustments. Photogrammetria, 
37(6), pp. 219 - 235. 
Leica Geosystems, 2004.  HDS2500 Specifications. 
http://www.cyra.com/products/hds2500. specs.html — (accessed 
23 April, 2004). 
Lichti, D.D., 2004. A Resolution Measure for Terrestrial Laser 
Scanners. In: /SPRS XX Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, 12 - 23 
July, 6 pages. 
Riegl, 2004. 3D Imaging Sensor LMS-Z2101. 
http://www.riegl.com/Ims-z210i/e Ims-z210i.htm (accessed 23 
April, 2004). 
Stanton, J.F., Eberhard, M.O. and Barr, P.J., 2003. A Weight- 
Stretched-Wire System for Monitoring 
Engineering Structures, 25(3), pp. 347 - 357. 
Deflections. 
Zhong, D., 1997. Robust Estimation and Optimal Selection of 
Polynomial Parameters for the Interpolation of GPS Geoid 
Heights. Journal of Geodesy, 71(9), pp. 552 - 561. 
9. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
The authors wish to thank Dale Keighley and Gerry Nolan from 
McMullen Nolan and Partners Surveyors Pty. Ltd. (Perth, 
Australia) for the use of their Cyra Cyrax 2500 and Dr lan 
Chandler from the Department of Civil Engineering at Curtin 
University of Technology, for organising the load tests. 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.