Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 7)

1ge 
ars 
the 
ind 
tof 
ere 
the 
Age 
nue 
nd. 
| to 
fits 
JK, 
to 
the 
as 
nts 
sed 
ork 
s of 
and 
een 
age 
03). 
an 
ion, 
sites 
was 
e to 
ea 
cted 
the 
the 
cate 
n of 
ces, 
the 
and 
well 
the 
trial 
n of 
International Archives of the Photog 
scanning would have required investment in hardware 
and software, which may have required the adoption of 
proprietary formats and products. This was beyond the 
scope of the project. Therefore, the addendum aimed to 
facilitate the capture and delivery of data that would be 
easily transferable between different software systems in 
the future. Collected data includes the scan data itself, in 
un-registered and registered form, images showing the 
data collected, photographic images of the subject and 
control information providing the ID, X, Y and Z 
coordinates of each control point. 
In addition to the collected data the addendum also 
outlined the health and safety issues relating to the use of 
lasers. For this purpose the addendum refers users 
directly to the current European standard (IEC, 2001). 
However, to facilitate an understanding of this 
complicated document the user guide provides a brief 
summary of the pertinent issues. 
In order to provide a case study demonstrating the use of 
the addendum on an actual site, a survey was undertaken 
at Clifford’s Tower, York. How this survey fulfils the 
metric survey specification and its addendum will be 
described along with the benefits and issues experienced 
during the survey. Prior to describing this survey, 
however, the role of the specification in the project 
flowline needs to be defined. 
2. THE PROJECT FLOWLINE 
  
Survey required - prepare 
project brief 
Tender period 
Contractors prepare and 
submit method statement 
(including costs) 
Survey commissioned 
Survey undertaken 
Y 
| 
| 
| 
I 
| Survey delivery | 
| 
| 
I 
| 
  
  
  
  
= 0 0 ss 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
L-.------ 
  
  
  
y 
| Quality assurance 
  
   
  
   
Archive Use FE 
  
  
  
  
Figure 1. The project flowline (dashed lines indicate 
reference 10 the specification). 
Figure | describes a typical project flowline. After 
identifying the need for a survey to be undertaken, a 
project brief is established by the client (in this case 
English Heritage). The project brief includes information 
that helps the contractor understand the site-specific 
needs and requirements of the survey. It is written with 
967 
rammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B7. Istanbul 2004 
direct reference to the survey specification which 
prompts the client for the relevant information. 
Once the project brief is prepared it is put out to tender 
and survey contractors provide a method statement 
detailing how they intend to undertake the survey. This 
Will include the standard topics required for any survey 
and outlined in the current metric survey specification. 
This includes items such as a risk assessment and 
delivery timetable/milestones. The specification will be 
referred to in order to help the contractor understand how 
the survey should be performed. The survey will then be 
commissioned and undertaken. During this work the 
contractor will generally be guided by the method 
statement but will also refer to the specification for 
guidance where necessary. Upon completion the client 
will use the project brief and standard specification to 
undertake a quality assurance process before accepting 
the survey and passing it into the archive and/or on for 
use. 
3. SURVEY OF CLIFFORD'S TOWER, YORK 
  
Figure 2. Clifford's Tower, York. 
Clifford's Tower (Figure 2) is the surviving keep of 
York's main medieval castle (Butler, 1997). It stands on 
a 14 metre high defensive motte (mound of earth) at the 
confluence of the River's Ouse and Foss. Although the 
site dates from 1069, the present day stone tower was 
built in 1245 under the orders of Henry III using a *four 
leaf” design. The tower itself is 15 metres tall with a 
diameter of 20 metres. Despite a period of neglect by the 
Tudors, including an enterprising, but un-official, scheme 
by the tower's gaoler to sell the structure stone by stone 
in 1596, the tower remained in use until 1684 when it 
was destroyed by fire. The extreme heat of this fire 
turned some of the magnesium limestone masonry pink. 
Since this time the Tower has remained a key piece of 
York's cultural heritage and become an important tourist 
attraction. 
As a key tourist attraction for the city there is a need to 
balance the conservation of the tower with providing the 
facilities and services required by visitors. The risk of 
further damage also requires an archive of survey data. 
For example, although the motte is out of bounds to the 
public its un-fenced grassy slopes are attractive to visitors 
and gradual damage to the motte is inevitable. The tower 
has also developed a noticeable lean due to gradual 
subsidence, first noted in 1315. 
photogrammetric data is available for the tower itself, no 
Finally, although 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.