International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B-YF. Istanbul 2004
The combination entropy (C.E.) represents the property of
combination between images. The larger the combination
entropy of an image, the richer the information contained in the
image. In Table 1, the combination entropy of the curvelet-
based image fusion is greater than those of other methods. Thus,
the curvelet-based image fusion method is better than the
wavelet and IHS methods in terms of combination entropy.
The mean gradient (M.G.) reflects the contrast between the
details variation of pattern on the image and the clarity of the
image. And the correlation coefficient (C.C.) between the
original and fused image shows the similarity in small size
structures between the original and synthetic images. In Table 1,
the mean gradient and the correlation coefficient of the
curvelet-based image fusion method are grater than those of the
wavelet-based image fusion method. As previously stated, if the
object of image fusion is to construct synthetic images which
are closer to the reality they represent, then the curvelet-based
image fusion method meet this objective very well. This is one
of the main advantages of using the curvelet transform for
image fusion.
Based on the experimental results obtained from this study, the
curvlet-based image fusion method is very efficient for fusing
IKONOS images This new method has reached an optimum
fusion result.
6. CONCLUSIONS
We have presented a newly developed method based on the
curvelet transform for fusing IKONOS images. In this paper, an
experimental study was conducted by applying the proposed
method, and also other image fusion methods, for fusing
IKONOS images. A comparison of the fused image from the
wavelet and IHS method was made.
Based on the experimental results respecting the four indicators
— the combination entropy, the mean gradient, and the
correlation coefficient, the proposed method provides a good
result, both visually and quantitatively, for remote sensing
fusion.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The first author much thanks Korea Aerospace Research
Institute for providing the raw IKONOS images for this
research.
References
Ranchin, T. and Wald, L., 2000. Fusion of High Spatial and
Spectral Resolution images: The ARSIS Concept and Its
Implementation. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote
Sensing, 66, pp. 49-61.
Wald, L., Ranchin, T., and Mangolini, M., 1997. Fusion of
Satellite images of different spatial resolution: Assessing the
quality of resulting images. Photogrammetric Engineering and
Remote Sensing, 63(6), pp. 691-699.
Nunez, J., Otazu, X., Fors, O., Prades, A., Pala, V., and Arbiol,
R., 1999. Multiresolution-based image fusion with addtive
wavelet decomposion. [EEE Transactions on Geoscience and
Remote sensing, 37(3), pp. 1204-1211.
64
Shi, W.Z., Zhu, C.Q., Zhu, C.Y., and Yang, X.M., 2003. Multi-
Band Wavelet for Fusing SPOT Panchromatic and
Multispectral Images. Photogrammetric Engineering and
Remote Sensing, 69(5), pp. 513-520.
Candes, E. J., 1999. Harmonic analysis of neural networks.
Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 6, pp. 197-218.
Candes, E. J., and Donoho, D. L., 1999. Curvelets- A
surprisingly effective nonadaptie representation for objects with
edges. in Curve and Surface Fitting: Saint-Malo, A. Cohen,
C.Rabut, and L.L.Schumaker, Eds. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt
University Press.
Starck, J. L., Candes, E. J., and Donoho, D.L., 2002. The
curvelet transform for image denosing. [EEE Trans. Image
Processing, 11, pp. 131-141.
Donoho, D.L., 2000. Orthonormal ridgelets and linear
singularities. SIAM J. Math Anal., 31(5), pp. 1062-1099.
Deans, S. R., 1983. The Radon transform and some of its
applications. John Wiley Sons, New York.
Donoho, D. L., 1998. Digital ridgelet transform via rectopolar
coordinate transform. Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA, Tech. Rep.
Starck, J. L., Murtagh, F., and Bijaoui, A., 1998. Image
Processing and Data Analysis: The Multiscale Approach.
Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Starck, J. L., Candes, E. J., and Donoho, D.L., 2003. Gray and
Color Image Contrast Enhancement by the Curvelet Transform.
IEEE Trans. Image Processing., 12(06), pp. 706-717.
"K^ eh -— LO rad Cl
N) YO INDY C) SN "r3 "rM "Sof — 4 0 —S- rS -
€) fO 'T3 (D 'rj py
E] <<
W
o0 <