International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXIX-B3, 2012
XXII ISPRS Congress, 25 August — 01 September 2012, Melbourne, Australia
Figure 3. Result of airplane recognition
In order to demonstrate the precision and robustness of the
proposed method, another LiDAR point cloud data is shown in
Figure 4 (the red and green points respectively represent ground
and non-ground points), which contain 64954 points and with a
density of 1.7 points/m?, and the results are shown in Figure 5
(the green and red points respectively represent airplane target
and other target points).
Figure 4. Another point cloud data to be identified
Figure 5. Result of airplane recognition
In this paper, we firstly use KD-tree to organize and manage
point cloud data, and make use of the clustering method to
segment objects, and then the prior knowledge and invariant
recognition moment are utilized to recognise airplanes. Some of
depth images obtained from results of the clustering method are
shown in Figure 6 (for displaying, in the depth images, the grey
range is 127-255, and the points of no value are set to 0). The
results in top row are correct, while the ones in below row are
incorrect, but can be eliminated by the invariant recognition
moment.
Figure 6. Depth images of the clustering results
In addition, in order to verify the effectivity of moment
invariants, we carried out an experiment utilizing the match
template method (Bin, 2008) to recognize airplanes in the same
depth image. Table 1 lists the performance comparison. The
results show that the moment invariants used in this paper is
superior to the other.
Result of Result of
this paper | paper (Bin,
2008)
Total number of targets 16 16
Number of correct results 15 13
Number of incorrect results 1 4
Number of miss targets 1 3
Accuracy rate (%) 93.75 81.25
False alarm rate (%) 6.25 23.53
Table 1. Performance comparison
6. CONCLUSIONS
Airplane recognition based on LiDAR point cloud data is a
brand new application domain. Taking advantage of KD-tree
and Moment Invariants, this paper presents a novel method to
recognize airplane targets. And by carrying out tests we
validated its feasibility and practicality. Considering many
other factors, e.g. canopy density, canopy thickness, and
LiDAR hardware properties, could influence the effect of
disguised objects detecting by using point cloud data, the
further research work should be considered the above issues.
In addition, the approach of this paper could also be applied to
other kinds of targets (even hidden targets) recognition. And we
are now working on the algorithm evaluation and perfection, as
well as analyzing the factors that affect targets recognition and
researching the better method for neighbour targets
segmentation.
7. REFERENCES
Bin, X., 2008. Research on object extraction and measurement
based on LiDAR data, Master Thesis, Academy of Opto-
Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Buck, J., Malm, A., Zakel, A., Krause, B., Tiemann, B., 2007.
High-resolution 3D coherent laser radar imaging. Laser
Radar Technology and Applications XII. Proc. of SPIE,
Vol. 6550, pp. 655002.
Golovinskiy, A., Kim, V., Funkhouser, T., 2009. Shape-based
recognition of 3D point clouds in urban environments.