Full text: Technical Commission III (B3)

International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXIX-B3, 2012 
XXII ISPRS Congress, 25 August — 01 September 2012, Melbourne, Australia 
EDGE-BASED REGISTRATION FOR AIRBORNE IMAGERY AND LIDAR DATA 
L.C. Chen**, C.Y. Lo® 
* Center for Space and Remote Sensing, National Central University, Taiwan - lcchen(g)csrsr.ncu.edu.tw 
? Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Central University, Taiwan - freezer@csrsr.ncu.edu.tw 
Commission III, WG III/4 
KEY WORDS: Aerial Imagery, Building, Detection, LIDAR, Model, Registration 
ABSTRACT: 
Aerial imagery and LIDAR points are two important data sources for building reconstruction in a geospatial area. Aerial imagery 
implies building contours with planimetric features; LIDAR data explicitly represent building geometries using three-dimensional 
discrete point clouds. Data integration may take advantage of merits from two data sources in building reconstruction and change 
detection. However, heterogeneous data may contain a relative displacement because of different sensors and the capture time. To 
reduce this displacement, data registration should be an essential step. Therefore, this investigation proposes an edge-based approach 
to register these two data sets in three parts: (1) data preprocessing; (2) feature detection; and (3) data registration. The first step 
rasterizes laser point clouds into a pseudo-grid digital surface model (PDSM), which describes the relief with the original elevation 
information. The second step implements topological analyses to detect image edges and three-dimensional structure lines from the 
aerial image and PDSM. These detected features provide the initial positions of building shapes for registration. The third part 
registers these two data sets in Hough space to compensate for the displacement. Because each building may have prominent 
geometric structures, the proposed scheme transforms these two groups of edges, and estimates the correspondence by the Hough 
distribution. The following procedure then iteratively compares two groups of Hough patterns, which are from an aerial image and 
LIDAR data. This iterative procedure stops when the displacement is within a threshold. The test area is located in Taipei City, 
Taiwan. DMC system captured the aerial image with 18-cm spatial resolution. The LIDAR data were scanned with a 10-point 
density per square meter using the Leica ALS50 system. This study proposed a 50 cm spatial resolution of PDSM, which is slightly 
larger than the point spacing. The experiment selected two buildings to evaluate the performance of the proposed scheme. The 
manually edited building boundaries from the stereo aerial images are the reference data for validation. Comparisons indicated that 
the registration procedure could adjust the displacement within 50 cm, which relates to PDSM resolution. These preliminary results 
also demonstrated the possibility of providing locations for building reconstruction. 
1. INTRODUCTION 
Buildings are essential objectives in a geospatial area. To 
achieve building modeling, the detection and reconstruction of 
building models comprise two major steps. Within the literature, 
three common data sets are used frequently. These include 
topomaps, aerial images, and LIDAR data. These three data sets 
represent building geometries in different phases. Topomaps 
describe existing building shapes with polylines or polygons, so 
that the locations are well known in a single time point. These 
vector data can generate models directly with accurate contour 
lines. However, topomaps may lack structure lines on rooftops. 
In certain places, even topomaps do not contain the elevation 
information. For the reconstruction of new buildings, changed 
structures, and detailed buildings, topomaps are insufficient for 
building reconstruction. Aerial images and LIDAR data then 
become two important data sources. 
Aerial images implicitly exhibit building geometries by edges 
and corners. Building extraction thus becomes a necessary step. 
The stereo pairs provide a basis to manually measure corners 
(Gruen and Wang, 2001) or structure lines (Rau and Chen, 2003) 
for building reconstruction with semiautomatic processes. By 
improving modeling automation, matching and positioning 
techniques generate the digital surface model (DSM) to 
compare with the designed primitives and reconstructed 
  
* Corresponding author 
building models by using the model-based concept (Hammoudi 
and Dornaika, 2011) or extract building areas by image 
classification (Zebedin et al., 2006). Although these approaches 
can enhance the modeling ability, the quality of generated DSM 
restricts the details of focused buildings directly. 
Conversely, the laser scanning system can provide dense point 
clouds to illustrate relief. This device blindly collects three- 
dimensional information of all objects along flight strips with 
discrete points (Ackermann, 1999). Building extraction is thus a 
high priority. In comparison with aerial imagery, the 
distribution of point clouds is helpful to identify building 
locations by using the elevation constraint. However, using this 
unorganized format may be difficult to delineate building 
boundaries directly by using image processing. Additional 
processes are necessary. Accordingly, numerous studies have 
proposed varied strategies to estimate three-dimensional lines 
from LIDAR data (Sohn and Dowman, 2007; Pu and 
Vosselman, 2009; Wang and Tseng, 2010). The major concept 
is the segmentation to derive point clouds of building facades 
and intersect lines for model reconstruction. The segmentation 
results depend on the selected mathematical models for point 
collection. 
Based on the combination of merits from heterogeneous data 
sets, data integration may be helpful to improve the degree of 
    
   
   
   
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
    
  
   
   
   
  
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
   
   
   
   
  
  
   
  
     
autc 
pert 
eta 
Bec 
con 
buil 
a né 
revi 
mar 
exis 
dete 
stuc 
for 
201 
they 
Zar 
Hat 
Cori 
pro 
Ho 
con 
disc 
mo: 
To 
ana 
ima 
det: 
the: 
ind 
mo 
loc: 
Thi 
aer 
edg 
fea! 
inl 
  
2.1 
Be 
dis 
eac 
prc 
dat 
Tec
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.