Full text: Technical Commission III (B3)

  
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXIX-B3, 2012 
XXII ISPRS Congress, 25 August — 01 September 2012, Melbourne, Australia 
  
Figure 10. Intersection image 
4. EXPERIMENT 
4.1 Data acquisition and camera calibration evaluation 
Data acquisition was performed in our test field in order to 
confirm the validity of the proposed simultaneous adjustment. 
The test field had 117 GCPs, and seven GCPs could be utilized 
in the triplet area. The GCPs were obtained by static 
observations using GPS that were set on the edges of road 
paints. Table 1 shows the data components used in this 
investigation and Figure 11 shows the centre image used in this 
investigation. It was taken at about 820 m and the image scale is 
about 1/13,700. Therefore, the GSD (Ground sampling 
distance) was about 12 cm. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Domain Item Contents 
Test field All GCPs 117 points 
Platform Helicopter AS-350BA 
Flight Speed 120 km/h 
Altitude 820 m 
GPS Rate 1 sec 
IMU Rate 200 Hz 
Laser Scan rate 50 kHz 
Scan angle 30 degree 
Pulse 4 pulse 
Digital Camera Focal length 60 mm 
Sensor size 9 x 9 um 
Image size 5440 x 4080 
Color depth 16bit 
  
  
  
  
Table 1. Data components 
Table 2 shows the root mean square errors for seven check 
points and permissible errors means restrictions for check points 
that are established by GSI when generating each scale map. RA 
(Relative Accuracy) means the value that was computed from 
equation (7). Standard error was computed under the 
56 
assumption that image-coordinate pointing is accomplished 
    
igure 11. Whole centre image 
  
     
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Type ox[m] | oy[m] | oz[m] RA 
Proposed method 0.209 0.269 0.242 1/1963 
Standard error 0.123 0.123 0.482 1/1601 
Permissible error 
1/500 0.150 0.150 0.200 1/2813 
1/1000 0.300 0.300 0.300 1/1578 
1/2500 0.750 0.750 0.500 1/699 
H =820m in RA 
Table 2. RMSE for check points 
= 1 
Jol +o} +o? (7) 
2 2 2 
295 3e; 3; 
Ox = tn Oy = 0) Go, = —9À 
ny ny n, 
where H — Altitude 
0x, Oy, 07 7 RSM error of X, Y, Z 
Oxi, yi, Oz; ^ differences in X, Y, Z coordinates 
ny, ny, nz = numbers of check points 
H 
Oxo "0p = = (8) 
HH 
20 7 V2 SA 
p B." 
where Oxo, Om, 07) = standard error 
H = altitude 
f= focal length 
B = base line 
op = pointing accuracy 
It can be seen that the vertical coordinate value, Z, is better than 
the horizontal coordinate values because the vertical 
coordinates of the pseudo-GCPs are constrained by laser 
distances as a characteristic of the proposed method. On the 
other hand, it can be found that the relative calibration accuracy 
is less than 1/500 and more than 1/1000 in comparison to the 
permissible error. It is consequently concluded that camera 
calibration using pseudo GCPs is practical. 
4.2 
Ob 
in | 
the 
car 
obt 
anc 
pro 
sha 
pro 
mo 
It i 
sin 
1/5 
Th 
pse 
Cor 
per 
aer 
Th 
anc 
Op: 
Mc 
pre 
Th 
ger 
sha 
Int
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.