ilding detection
ol. The feature
features with a
These training
mount of image
or each object
> representative
arability of the
ently, SEaTH
um separability
Here, choosing
es in the image
that result in
nction between
' determined as
been presented
Case study
e identified as
ariable).
[ON
his paper as a
igh resolution
core of this
[n this section,
haracteristic of
in analysis tool
ther classes in
ires together in
'eneralize this
| the threshold
edges and/or
> and even any
om making no
1 seems to will
nodel to other
Parameter for
according to
| stages, giving
omatic process
rocess.
to extract all
and variable
features together, it could not be accomplished as shown in the
below image (figure 6).
Figure 6. Resulted image
Extraction of over 8096 buildings shown in the resulted image
indicates successful applicability of algorithm presented in this
research. Though, as mentioned, it was not successful in some
cases, e.g. detecting buildings with light roofs (A). Since
threshold of spectral features (Ratio B2 & Ratio B4) are
arranged for detection of dark roofs and gable roof, this
conclusion seems reasonable. This is because of failing analysis
tool in extracting suitable features which result in optimal
separation of building class with light roof from other classes.
Also, in some cases, roof was not totally included in building
class (especially in relation with middle line of buildings with
gable roof). In these cases, objects with total vicinity with
building class were regarded as building (Post-processing
stage).
As shown in the above image, some objects are classified in
building class by mistake. In these cases, the intended object
includes part of building and part of the adjacent phenomenon
(B) that algorithm allocates these objects to the building class
entirely. In these cases, it is possible to consider a smaller scale
parameter that leads to the production of smaller objects. Of
course, quality of detecting other buildings was reduced upon
such segmentation. In other cases where big objects were
allocated to building class by mistake (for example, two dark
rectangles on the bottom of the image (C)), these objects were
omitted from building class using area feature. Also, in some
cases, though image objects were small and building roof and
adjacent phenomenon were not simultaneously covered by that
object, it was inevitably included in building class (D) since all
conditions were qualified
4. CONCLUSION
This paper tends to extract building using an object based image
analysis approach. This method allows us to use neighborhood,
contextual and geometrical features in addition to spectral
features. It has been attempted to present a general algorithm for
building extraction from different satellite image. In the first
step, the image pixels from the image are grouped to form
objects with the aid of multiresolution segmentation algorithm.
Then the features that lead to robust building extraction will be
determined. Features are divided into two classes in this
algorithm: stable and variable. Stable features are derived from
inherent characteristics of building phenomenon and they
provide us the possibility to be implemented on different
satellite images. Variable features, depending on the case, are
extracted using a feature analysis tool (SEaTH). Implementing
this algorithm on a part of Isfahan QuickBird imagery was
successful in extracting over 8096 existing buildings. Though in
some cases the presented algorithm was not successful, the
results were generally promising and the authors intend to
examine complete transferability of classification model to other
data sets and determine how much threshold values and features
require adjustment and also find a solution for obtaining
optimized scale parameter in an automatic process in the
subsequent researches.
REFERENCES
Aminipouri, M., Sliuzas, R. and Kuffer, M., 2009. Object-
Oriented Analysis of Very High Resolution Orthophotos for
Estimating the Populations of Slum Areas, Case of Dar-Es-
Salaam, Tanzania, High-Resolution Earth Imaging for
Geospatial Information, ISPRS Workshop, Hannover, Germany.
Benz, U.C., Hofmann, P., Willhauck, G., Lingenfelder, I. and
Heynen, M., 2004. Multi-Resolution, Object-Oriented Fuzzy
Analysis of Remote Sensing Data for GIS-Ready Information.
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 58(3-
4): 239-258.
Blaschke, T., 2010. Object based image analysis for remote
sensing. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote
Sensing. Vol. 65 (2010) 2 16.
Dutta, D. and Serker, N.H.M.K., 2005. Urban Building
Inventory Development using Very High Resolution Remote
Sensing Data for Urban Risk Analysis. International Journal of
Geoinformatics, , 1(1).
Hofmann, P. (2001) Detecting urban features from IKONOS
data using an object-oriented approach. First Annual
Conference of the Remote Sensing & Photogrammetry Society.
Munich, Germany.
Hofmann, P., Strobl, J., Blaschke, T. and Kux, H., 2008.
Detecting Informal Settlements from QuickBird Data in Rio de
Janeiro Using an Object-Based Approach. In: T. Blaschke, S.
Lang and G.J. Hay (Editors), Object-Based Image Analysis.
Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 531-553
Nussbaum, S., and Menz, G., 2008. Object-Based Image
Analysis and Treaty Verification. Springer Science+Business
Media B.V.
57