Full text: Technical Commission VII (B7)

    
  
   
    
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
   
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
   
  
  
  
    
    
  
  
  
  
     
1S 
of 
1S 
  
n, 
ad 
id 
es 
1d 
or 
al 
  
Figure 6. Landsat image; an example of result of Minimum 
Distance classification, and final result after correcting 
A quick analysis of validation, focused on impervious areas 
detected, has been realized for evaluating the goodness of the 
applied processes, by using a confusion matrix based on ground 
truth region of interest. A plenty of ROIs were selected all over 
the landscape under investigation, which was enhanced by 
using a sharpen filter to get a better visualization. Considering a 
single class which merges together the impervious categories 
found, it was reached an overall accuracy of around 63%. This 
value is due to an important amount of terrains which are still 
mixing with urban areas, but further investigations will be 
focused on differentiate those kind of soils. 
2.5 First remarks 
Actually it is really difficult, at this spatial resolution, to 
discriminate different typologies of urban settlements and 
certain bare soils. That is why we look for additional layers and 
steps, in order to express the most effective land cover 
composition of urban landscape, consistent with the scale of 
analysis. The results of the work will be an important step, but a 
new starting point, to redefine a more precise spectral library 
and a possible different composition of the layers into the 
images in order to achieve the better and faster outcomes. 
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXIX-B7, 2012 
XXII ISPRS Congress, 25 August — 01 September 2012, Melbourne, Australia 
3. DEFINING URBAN CLASS CATEGORIES, BASED 
ON MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES 
3.1 Overview 
The development of GIS technologies has provided a variety of 
analytical tools for analysis and management of landscape, 
urban or natural. The ability to quantify the structure of a 
territorial system is a basic requirement for the study of 
environment and its changes over time. The quantitative metric, 
based on descriptive indicators, provides a representative 
database which allows analyzing the landscape, but the 
interpretation of the indicators requires an adequate knowledge 
of the geographical context but, most of all, of the phenomenon 
under investigation. In this work, under the hypothesis that 
urban settlements are the effect of a sum of different typologies 
of morphological structure, we intend to automatically 
discriminate three different types of texture: continuous, 
discontinuous, and scattered. 
3.2 Methodology 
3.2.1 Post-processing the remote sensing result: Once 
obtained the final dataset about impervious areas, we aim to 
measure the degree of physical continuity of urban settlements 
through the use of morphological features such as shape, 
fragmentation, and density, in order to define strong and weak 
relations between the composing parts of the urban texture. 
After applying filters of clump and median it has been 
converted, the result of remote sensing classification, in a 
shapefile and exported to a GIS platform. Morphological 
features for all the patches, which compose the landscape, will 
be now synthesized through the use of synthetic indicators. 
3.2.2 Morphological indices: Three synthetic indices have 
been employed for this study: a Covering Index (1), that is the 
percentage of total area of a single cell (4) occupied by the 
urbanized area (a) resulting of the sum of all the patches in that 
cell; the Fractal Dimension (2) which equals 2 times the 
logarithm of the perimeter p; (m) of a patch, divided by the 
logarithm of the area of the patch a; (m?); the Degree of 
Landscape Division (3) resulting by the quadrate of the ratio 
between the area of a patch a; and the entire urbanized area a, 
in a cell. 
n 
2.4 
E i=l 
A 
20253 p) Q) 
CI (1) 
i=l 
n 
Inq, 
i=l 
FD= 
2 
DLD=1 ME 3) 
i=1 X tor 
where a; = area of patch 
a, = total urbanized area in a cell 
pi = perimeter of patch 
A = area of a square cell of 200m 
3.2.3 Analysis and texture classification: The calculation has 
been proportioned by using a grid with square mesh of 200m,
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.