Full text: Technical Commission VII (B7)

    
  
  
  
ll (1- 
ation 
25% 
(Xia 
ation 
atial 
; the 
Chla 
f the 
nged 
erent 
were 
duce 
and 
were 
mula 
f the 
ated, 
)arse 
    
According to the equation of estimation error, retrieval 
algorithm of MODIS 250m should exist second order derivative. 
Then cubic polynomial model was chosen for estimating chla 
concentration after comparing correlation coefficient. And the 
scale relative error of low resolution images (MODIS 500m) in 
different seasons can be calculated by formula (6) and cubic 
polynomial formulas. As field measured data were distributed 
in the north and central of Taihu, the paper only discussed 
relative errors in these places (see Figure 5.). 
  
  
  
  
  
Figure 5. Comparison of relative errors in different season 
(MODIS 250m and MODIS 500m). (a) Relative error on Mach 
28". 2011 (spring). (b) Relative error on September 4^, 2011 
(summer). (c) Relative error on October 31%, 2010 (autumn) 
Figure 5. showed the distribution of scale relative error of chla 
concentration in different seasons. In this paper effect of lake’s 
boundary was ignored, and the results were as follows. In 
spring, the error was relatively lower and more homogeneous. 
The error concentrated between 0 and 4%. The high values of 
relative errors were primarily concentrated in Meiliang Bay, 
Gonghu Bay and Western Lakeshore. The errors were higher 
and more unevenly distributed in summer. The scale relative 
error was high in Western Lakeshore and the area water 
between Meiliang Bay and Gonghu Bay, and the highest error 
reached to 23%. The values were between 0-12% in other 
regions. Scale relative error was also high in autumn. The range 
of the relative error was 10% -17% in north of Meiliang Bay 
and central of Taihu. And it was 0-10% in other regions. 
According to the paper above, the relative error of chla 
concentration varies with the seasons. Scale relative errors were 
lower and more evenly distributed in spring. Because of the low 
value, uniform spatial distribution of chla concentration and low 
variance of chla concentration, the relative scale errors were 
lower than that in summer and qutumn. For summer terms, the 
chla concentration was high and the spatial distribution was 
uneven, especially for the regions where accumulation of algal 
blooms (eg Meiliang Bay, Western Lakeshore). It also leaded to 
high variances, resulting high scale relative errors in these 
regions. In addition, it is noted that the scale relative error also 
closely related to the inversion model of chla concentration, and 
the results could affected by different inversion models. 
5. CONCLUSIONS 
Firstly, the paper established estimation models of chla 
concentration using HJ-1 CCD, MODIS 250m and MODIS 
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXIX-B7, 2012 
XXII ISPRS Congress, 25 August — 01 September 2012, Melbourne, Australia 
500m and field data in October 2010, March 2011, and 
September 2011. Secondly, spatial heterogeneity was studied 
using geostatistics. Thirdly, according to the spatial scale 
relative error model, scale errors of chla concentration which 
were inverted by MODIS 500m were calculated in different 
seasons. 
Chla concentration was variation in different seasons. The 
values were low and evenly distributed in spring. In summer, 
chla concentration was high in the west shore of Lake Taihu, 
export of Meiliang Bay and Gonghu Bay. And the high values 
mainly distributed in Meiliang Bay, Zhushan Bay and Gonghu 
Bay in autumn. In addition, the trends of chla concentration 
estimated from different scales were similar to each other in the 
same season. But details of low-resolution remote sensing 
images (especially blue-green cyanobacteria agglomeration area) 
couldn't be well express. Through the seasonal analysis of 
semi-variance function on different scales, it is known that 
structural factors caused by chla concentration were mainly due 
to spatial heterogeneity. Chla concentration at different scales 
showed similar structure in the same season, while the chla 
concentration in different seasons had different structural.. 
Lake Taihu is typical inland case II water. Higher spatial 
heterogeneity of chla concentration caused higher scale error. 
And the error changed with seasons. Scale errors were low and 
evenly distributed in spring. Because of exploding and floating 
together of cyanobacteria, scale errors increased up to 23%. 
Moreover, great uncertainties and errors existed in the inversion 
of chla concentration using MODIS 500m data. 
REFERENCES 
Bao, Y., and Tian Q.J., 2011. Spatial scale effect and spatial 
scaling of chlorophyll-a concentration in Lake Taihu, China. In: 
International Conference on Geolnformatics, Shanghai, China, 
pp.1-5. 
Chen, J., Ni, S. Y., Li, J. J. and Wu, T., 2006. Sealing effect 
and spatial variability in retrieval of vegetation LAl from 
remotely sensed data. Acta Ecological Sinica, 26(5), pp.1502- 
1508. 
Chen, J, Wang, W.C., Wang, BJ, and Wen ZH, 
2010.Distrubution variance of suspended sedment concentration 
and scaling effect correction: eight neighborhood algorithm. J. 
Infrared Millim. Waves, 29(6), pp. 440-444. 
Curran, P.J., and Atkinson, P. M., 1998. Geostatistics and 
remote sensing. Progress in Physical Geography, 22, 61-78. 
Fragoso, C.R., Motta, D.M.L., Collischonn, W., Tucci, C.E.M., 
and Nes, E.H.V., 2008. Modelling spatial heterogeneity of 
phytoplankton in Lake Mangueira, a large shallow subtropical 
lake in South Brazil. Ecological modeling, 219,pp.125-137. 
Feng, W., Feng, X.Z, and Ma, R.H., 2007. Research on 
correlations between chlorophyll concentration and reflectance 
spectral of Taihu Lake. Remote Sensing Information, 1, pp. 18- 
21. 
Huy, C. M,, Chen, Z. Q., Clayton, T. D., Swarzenski, P., Brock, 
J.C., and Muller-Karger, F. E., 2004. Assessment of estuarine 
water-quality indicators using MODIS medium resolution bands:
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.