Full text: Technical Commission VII (B7)

were acquired before and after an attack for our change 
analysis. 
A fast detection and visualization of change in areas of crisis or 
catastrophes are important requirements for planning and 
coordination of help. Therefore, the objective of our research 
was to develop a reliable and accurate automated algorithm to 
detect changes on man-made objects. This algorithm should be 
used in catastrophic events or humanitarian crises to show the 
impact of this particular event.. 
2. STANDARD CHANGE DETECTION METHODS 
For a comprehensive assessment of the quality of any new 
method it is essential to compare it to the performance of 
standard change detection approaches. For comparison, we 
selected those algorithms that are available in most remote 
sensing image processing systems. These methods are: (i) 
image difference; (ii) image ratio; (iii) PCA; (iv) delta cue; and 
(v) post classification analysis. 
Image difference is an easy-to-understand and to-implement 
method. It is based on calculating the per-pixel gray value 
differences. If the resulting values are unchanged or do not 
exceed a pre-determined threshold no change has occurred. The 
degree of change is determined by the gray value differences. 
The image ratio method is very similar to image difference. For 
every pair of gray values at the same location at dates Tl and 
T2 the per-pixel ratio of the two values is calculated. Both 
methods vary through different spectral band combinations, the 
choice of thresholds, or different available spectral resolutions 
(Jensen 2005). 
The principal component (PC) transform is a statistical method 
to calculate a new synthetic (uncorrelated) data space. PC 
analysis (PCA) can be used in different ways for change 
detection. In this study, we employ a selective bitemporal PCA 
(Tomowski et al. 2010). Two bitemporal spectral bands of the 
same location are analyzed in a two-dimensional feature space. 
As a result, all gray values are analyzed in relation to the two 
principal components. Usually, the unchanged pixels lie in the 
direction of the first PC whereas the changed pixel along the 2™ 
PC axis. 
Post classification analysis is based on a comparison of two 
independent classification results for at least two dates T1 und 
T2. This method allows the determination of the kind of change 
from one class to another. 
The delta cue approach is a combination of different image 
processing techniques. These techniques are assembled into an 
integrated procedure. It consists of the following change 
detection algorithms: (i) tasseled cap soil brightness and 
greenness differences; (ii) magnitude difference; (iii) primary 
color difference; (iv) single band difference; and (v) band slope 
difference. 
The following formula is used by all the presented change 
detection algorithms to compute the relative difference (R) of 
the images T1 and T2: 
TI -T2 ,I-T2 
|T1| |T2| 
The features tasseled cap, primary color difference, band slope 
difference, and magnitude difference cannot be used in this 
study because the input images are panchromatic (single-band) 
images. This leaves just the single band difference algorithm 
and is therefore quite limited. In the next step, a threshold is 
determined to differentiate between real change and pseudo 
change. New geometric properties are then used to identify the 
changed buildings. These geometric properties include area, 
elongation, and compactness of connected pixels. These 
  
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXIX-B7, 2012 
XXII ISPRS Congress, 25 August — 01 September 2012, Melbourne, Australia 
   
connected pixels build a blob of which major and minor axis 
can also be determined. 
3. COMBINED EDGE SEGMENT TEXTURE (CEST) 
ANALYSIS FOR CHANGE DETECTION 
Based on the fact that simple methods such as image 
differencing or image ratio failed to reliably detect changes of 
buildings in the study images, we had to develop a different 
procedure for automated change detection. This procedure is 
based on a number of different principles, namely frequency 
based filtering, segmentation, and texture analysis. Four of 
these methods are based on filtering in the frequency domain 
after a Fourier transform (FT), one on segmentation and the 
others on texture features. The frequency domain is used 
because it allows the direct identification of relevant features 
such as edges of buildings. If no features are directly visible 
(such as partial destruction with still standing outside walls), 
texture parameters are used for debris identification. A 
segmentation algorithm is used to extract size and shape of 
buildings. These methods can be combined in a decision tree for 
accuracy improvement. The combination of these processing 
steps is called Combined Edge Segment Texture (CEST) 
analysis. 
3.1 Fourier Transform Based Algorithms 
The FT is defined for a single band or panchromatic images 
(Cooley & Tukey 1965). Based on a frequency analysis in the 
spectral domain, isotropic band pass filters can be designed that 
highlight selected frequencies and - as such - structures in the 
images. The design of band pass filters in the frequency domain 
is based on size and resolution of the images, and the estimated 
size of buildings and man-made structures where changes are to 
be detected. The filtered images are then transformed back into 
the spatial domain for further analysis. Higher frequencies 
visualize the position of building, the highest frequencies, 
however, contain mostly noise and are not useful for object 
identification and extraction. Lower frequencies contain mostly 
general image background which is not used for further 
analysis. After a number of tests, an optimum band pass filter is 
created which includes the most appropriate information for 
building extraction (Klonus et al. 2011b). 
After transforming Tl and T2 via a fast FT (FFT) and the 
adaptive band pass filtering, four different methods can be 
applied to extract the changed structures: (i) subtraction in the 
frequency domain, (ii) correlation in the frequency domain, (iii) 
correlation in the spatial domain, and (iv) edge detection in the 
spatial domain. Of these methods, the best results are obtained 
using the edge detection algorithm (Klonus et al. 2011a). 
Consequently, we incorporated this method as a default 
function into the CEST analysis. 
3.2 Methods Based on Texture Parameters 
Frequency based filtering is particularly suited to detect 
changes in edge structures. If edges remain intact, however, 
textural features may be used for change analysis. For the 
calculation of texture parameters, we make use of the well- 
known features defined by Haralick et al. (1973). The idea is 
that buildings can have higher texture values than areas without 
buildings, especially, if the surrounding neighborhood is very 
homogeneous and the buildings are very small or destroyed 
(with surrounding debris). The Haralick features are calculated 
using a window technique. Initial tests with a number of 
different features showed that ‘energy’ and ‘inverse distance 
  
  
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.