012
the main
formation
congruent
1g of 0.4
livered in
ach DEM
is derived
sometrical
rous error
areas are
[M-C and
for many
.
sistencies,
.g. 10m)
els should
in a more
identified
different
10 digital
60 DN
of single
maximum
ree.
ells were
ributing a
led SAR
1el of the
DEM and
-X DEM
2011).
8km was
m east of
(center of
extraction
de image
into the
les in the
generally
nd details
ist to west
ht values
ctively.
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXIX-B7, 2012
XXII ISPRS Congress, 25 August — 01 September 2012, Melbourne, Australia
Figure 1 1: Subset tile N34W78, amplitude mosaick
For the water indication mask the amplitude and the coherence
are evaluated as mentioned above. Figure 14 shows a
visualisation of the WAM. The beige colored pixels indicate
water derived solely from the amplitude, light blue indicates
water found in the amplitude and the coherence. Dark blue
indicates water found in the amplitude and the coherence of two
overlapping acquisitions.
Near the scene center, where two bridges cross the river, it can
be seen that the amplitude and coherence flag complement one
another very well. Although, the coherence does not indicate
water here it is found by the amplitude threshold.
Smaller lakes, like e.g. the two which can be seen in the middle
left of the amplitude image, fall below the minimum mapping
unit for lakes and rivers which is two hectares (20,000 m?).
In a later editing step it is planned to use the water indication
mask for flattening noisy DEM areas over water. A first study
for this DEM editing step and more detailed information about
WAM generation can be found in (Wendleder et al. 2012).
5. CONCLUSIONS
First calibrated and mosaicked intermediate TanDEM-X DEMs
were presented. In flat and sparsely vegetated areas the
validation shows an absolute height accuracy of better than 2m
with respect to all reference data.
Also in hilly and vegetated areas the height criteria can be met
already with the first coverage. The difference to USGS
Seamless data with about 10m is explainable as this dataset is a
terrain model, while the TanDEM-X DEM is a surface model.
On the other hand the comparison to SRTM and ICESat show
good absolute accuracy of better than 7m.
More mountainous test sites were not considered up to now, as
there may be phase unwrapping errors. These errors need at
least an additional acquisition and dual baseline processing to
be resolved for DEM generation.
Mg
Figure 12: Subset tile N34W78, color shaded DEM
Figure 13: Subset tile N34W78, height error map
Figure 14: Subset tile N34W78, water indication mask, beige:
water derived from amplitude, light blue: water derived from
amplitude and coherence, dark blue: water derived from
amplitude and coherence in two acquisitions
49