International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXIX-B7, 2012
XXII ISPRS Congress, 25 August — 01 September 2012, Melbourne, Australia
4.2 Experimental results
By the procedures of persistent scatter InSAR, refined 1520
persistent scatters are detected from 26 radar images by the
statistical computation of time series of amplitudes. Figure 5
displays the distribution of all the 1520 persistent scatters
marked with yellow points and superimposed onto an optical
Lantude tex?
Longitude (Dez :
Figure 5. PSs superimposed onto an optical orthoimage
3128
ws
is
A
Latitude (D3eg.3
MEAN
400 600
0172 200:
Figure 6. Two-dimensional Delaunay
network based on the image
orthoimage download from GoogleEarth. The two-dimensional
Delaunay network and three-dimensional Delaunay network of
1520 persistent scatters are constructed based on image
planar coordinates and Cartesian coordinates respectively.
Figure 6 demonstrates the two-dimensional network reformed
by lkm threshold. 4092 arcs, i.e., 4092 NDP observations are
obtained from the planar network. Figure 7 shows the planar
projection of three-dimensional network optimized with lkm
threshold. 4502 arcs are generated in this network. The number
of NDP observations of TDPDN is significantly more than that
of planar network. Based on persistent scatter InSAR
algorithm, the subsidence of persistent scatters is derived
according to two-dimensional network and three-dimensional
network respectively. The statistics of subsidence is displayed
in table 2. The maximum subsidence velocity detected with
two-dimensional network is 21.0 mm/a and the minimum is 6.0
mma, and the average subsidence velocity is 16.8 mm/a. The
maximum and minimum subsidence velocities achieved by
TDPDN are 18.3 mm/a and 7.8 mm/a respectively, and the
average subsidence velocity is 13.7 mm/a.
121.52
EM
121.56
Longiaude tDez.i
Figure 7. Projection of three-dimensional network on
two-dimensional plane in study area
Table 1. The parameters of 26 ERS-1/2 SAR images used in this study.
Temporal Normal Temporal Normal Temporal Normal
No. Imaging date baseline baseline | No. Imaging date baseline baseline | No. Imaging date baseline baseline
(day) (m) (day) (m) (day) (m)
1 1992.06.06 -1459 -1249.61| 10 1996.03.26 -70 255.64 1:19. 1999.12.21 1285 -691.39
2... 1992.09.19 -1354 -1139.68| 11 1996.06.03 -1 -84.260 | 20 | 2000.05.09 1449 . -1445.09
3 1993.04.17 -1144 -1189.5 | 12 1996.06.04 0 0 21 2000.06.13 1475 -619.88
4 1993.07.31 -1039 -1088.19| 13 1997.11.11 534 -328.45 | 22 2000.09.26 1554 -1206.38
S 19934113 -934 -568.70 | 14 1998.02.24 611 18.0 23 2001/1120 1986 -959.86
6 1995.04.10 -421 -639.80 | 15 1998.03.31 635 -572.38 | 24 2002.06.18 2200 -1839.42
7. 1995.10.02 -246 -1131.73| 16 1998.05.05 722 -1086.85| 25 2002.07.23 2226 -1041.75
8 — 19960219 -106 — -1445.48| 17 1999.04.20 1041 -1207.12| 26 2002.08.27 2253 66.43
9 1996.03.25 -71 155.96 | 18. . 1999.11.16 1259 -736.70
60