Full text: Technical Commission VIII (B8)

from incomplete or inconsistent maps and environmental data. 
Several studies have been executed by the United Nations 
which proof that rural areas have been mapped in smaller scales 
only and have not been updated for many years (e.g. 
Brandenberger 1987). The same applies for environmental data 
and GIS data bases. Only if we develop methods and 
operational approaches to monitor the rural environment, which 
means also the agricultural land use, we will gain spatial 
information to improve sustainable land management and food 
security. 
Related approaches have been earmarked by the World Bank, 
from the German Agency for International Cooperation and 
even the Millennium Challenge Corporation for many years, 
but without really turning around the situation of rural areas 
around the world (cf. Falloux 1989). Therefore the article 
describes a demand driven approach using remote sensing 
within a processing chain as technology which can be managed 
in the hands of agronomic experts with local knowledge. 
2. SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGEMENT 
AND FOOD SECURITY 
2.1 Reciprocity between Food Security, Land Management 
and Climate 
The importance of the issues on food security and land man- 
agement becomes obvious when looking at the following fig- 
ures: 
* Currently more than 1 billion people on earth are affected 
by hunger and more than 30 countries are experiencing 
food emergencies (cf. FAO 2009). 
= Global population passed the 7 billion milestone in 2011 
and will reach 10 billion by 2050. (cf. Crossette 2011) 
= 40 6 of all internal conflicts over the last 60 years have had 
a link to natural resources (cf. UNEP 2011) 
= Biofuel production has increased sharply in the past few 
years (cf. Flammini 2008; Godvina 2010). 
These alarming figures underline the overall significance of a 
responsible use of natural resources, which demands a monitor- 
ing of the current developments, and the research for improved 
methodological tools to be integrated into operational applica- 
tions. Although the mapping or monitoring of complex agro 
ecological aspects by highly specialist remote sensing experts is 
done far away from the target areas, this innovative approach 
focuses on bringing adapted but easy to handle processing tools 
to the local experts. 
2.2 Operational Remote Sensing Services to Agriculture 
and Land Tenure 
The impacts of climate change, disasters and conflicts, soil and 
land degradation versus the increasing demand on food and en- 
ergy production and the increasing global population span an 
area of conflict targeting land as prime ecosystem resource. 
Questions such as: 
= How many people can be sustained on earth? 
= Which land resources are threatened through climate 
change? 
= What kind of land use change will be caused through an 
increasing production of biofuels? 
= What potentials can an increased agricultural production 
provide in order to reduce the conflict between land 
degradation and land loss and the increasing pressure on the 
remaining land resources? 
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXIX-B8, 2012 
XXII ISPRS Congress, 25 August — 01 September 2012, Melbourne, Australia 
are discussed diversely. Tools to measure, describe, and assess 
sources and impacts of these land use conflicts request enor- 
mous efforts, but given the complexity, they are still not suffi- 
cient to provide answers. Although these conflicts have a global 
dimension their sources and solutions are at a regional or local 
level. Solutions by means of land resource management sys- 
tems need to involve the regional and local stakeholders’ net- 
works. As such, geospatial information derived from satellite 
earth observation can contribute to implement structures for 
sustainable land management systems. 
GMFS and SASCHA services are designed to contribute to this. 
Based on the highly innovative developments at the latest status 
of research and technologies, stakeholders of various thematic 
domains can get access to geospatial technologies but without 
the need to be experts in remote sensing or GIS. The processing 
tools are designed for experts and operators skilled in the fields 
of agricultural statistics or nature conservation who are non 
remote sensing experts. Either through very robust and clear 
processing steps (see indicative fAPAR maps processing 
below) or through advanced software developments which are 
systematically integrated into platforms, providing instruments 
with easy to use interfaces, but having access to advanced 
optical and radar remote sensing processing routines in the 
background. Specifically the software tools such as ALIS © 
(see CuA processing and SASCHA application below) will 
facilitate knowhow and technology transfer and increase the 
availability and access for up to date remote sensing 
methodologies to non remote sensing experts, but also 
contribute to multi-scale geo information systems. 
Through the RCMRD as GMFS’s regional coordinator, a 
sustainable and operational structure is available which is 
mandated to support the training, access and transfer to the 
different national and local users. Further to this, the Federal 
Ministry of Agriculture in Sudan and the Ministry of 
Agriculture and Food Security in Malawi are involved as direct 
GMES beneficiaries at national level. In this respect the GMFS 
Agricultural Monitoring services are well designed for a 
successful, very useful and sustainable user driven technology 
transfer. 
The Federal Ministry of Agriculture (FMoA) in Sudan 
requested GMFS to investigate EO contributions to the 
agricultural monitoring in particular the assessment of 
traditional rain fed areas. It is understood that monitoring and 
statistics frameworks in this sector are a difficult issue, since 
the infrastructure in the traditional rain fed areas is low, the 
areas are huge, and the large seasonal variations have an impact 
on the distribution and location of cultivated area. Due to this, 
adequate sampling schemes are required each year and inter 
annual comparisons are important. In this respect GMFS was 
requested by the FMoA and consulted by the GMFS Steering 
committee to step in via an enhanced integration of Remote 
Sensing at two different scales into the agricultural monitoring 
framework. 
The first required products are cultivated area maps at a scale of 
1:50.000, based on recently acquired HR optical and SAR data 
to support the Sudanese user institutions in monitoring 
agriculture production in Sudan. 
The second requirement is to generate an indicative map of 
vegetation growth activities as early as possible, at a scale of 
1:1000.000 based on Medium Resolution MERIS imagery 
before the harvest in Sudan in order to create information to 
better coordinate the given resources for field survey and 
interviewing campaigns. 
  
  
  
     
   
  
  
  
   
  
   
  
   
   
  
  
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
   
  
    
  
   
  
    
   
   
   
  
   
  
   
  
   
  
  
  
   
     
   
  
    
   
  
   
  
   
  
  
  
   
  
  
   
   
   
   
   
    
  
E me 
[ Ortharezti! 
  
The pr: 
picted « 
remote 
the dat: 
process 
the proj 
referen 
of the ı 
tember, 
tober. 
  
The cre 
softwar 
of whic] 
23 Ap 
The rer 
thy tool 
beyond 
tion ins: 
tion for 
in Afric 
of the d 
start the 
in Afric 
tributior 
Environ 
Europea 
monitor 
serving 
gal, Ma 
zambiqu
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.