REMOTE-SENSING-BASED BIOPHYSICAL MODELS FOR ESTIMATING LAI
OF IRRIGATED CROPS IN MURRY DARLING BASIN
Indira Wittamperuma!, Mohsin Hafeez" 2, Mojtaba Pakparvar’and John Louis*
!School of Environmental Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga NSW 2678, Australia.
Email: iwittamperuma@csu.edu.au
GHD Pty Ltd, 201 Charlotte Street, Brisbane QLD, 4000
3Faculty of Bioscience Engineering Gent University, 673 Cupour Links, Gent 9000, Belgium
“School of Computing and Mathematics, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga NSW 2678, Australia.
KEY WORDS: GIS, LAL, LANDSAT TM, NDVI, Remote Sensing,
ABSTRACT:
Remote sensing is a rapid and reliable method for estimating crop growth data from individual plant to crops in irrigated
agriculture ecosystem. The LAI is one of the important biophysical parameter for determining vegetation health, biomass,
photosynthesis and evapotranspiration (ET) for the modelling of crop yield and water productivity. Ground measurement of
this parameter is tedious and time-consuming due to heterogeneity across the landscape over time and space. This study
deals with the development of remote-sensing based empirical relationships for the estimation of ground-based LAI (LAG)
using NDVI, modelled with and without atmospheric correction models for three irrigated crops (corn, wheat and rice)
grown in irrigated farms within Coleambally Irrigation Area (CIA) which is located in southern Murray Darling basin, NSW
in Australia. Extensive ground truthing campaigns were carried out to measure crop growth and to collect field samples of
LAI using LAI- 2000 Plant Canopy Analyser and reflectance using CROPSCAN Multi Spectral Radiometer at several farms
within the CIA. A Set of 12 cloud free Landsat 5 TM satellite images for the period of 2010-11 were downloaded and
regression analysis was carried out to analyse the co-relationships between satellite and ground measured reflectance and to
check the reliability of data sets for the crops. Among all the developed regression relationships between LAI and NDVI, the
atmospheric correction process has significantly improved the relationship between LAI and NDVI for Landsat 5 TM
images. The regression analysis also shows strong correlations for corn and wheat but weak correlations for rice which is
currently being investigated.
1. INTRODUCTION
LAI is a dimensionless vegetation biophysical parameter
which defines the status of the vegetation growth and it is
a key input parameter in crop growth and yield models
(Doraiswamy et al., 2005), plant photosynthesis
(Duchemin et al, 2006), evapotranspiration (ET) and
carbon flux (Chen et al, 2007). Therefore, direct or
indirect estimation of LAI measurements are key input in
many ecosystem models.
The direct method of LAI calculation involves steps
including leaf collection, area determination and
measurement of dry weight of leaves to derive the ratios
of leaf area and mass per unit ground area (Zheng et al.,
2009). In many agricultural and forestry applications,
LAI was directly estimated to assess crop growth and
health of vegetation around the globe. Sarlikioti et al.,
(2011) measured LAI destructively to explore a way for
the online estimation of LAI and PAR interception in two
greenhouse grown crops (tomato and sweet paper).
Casanova et al., (1998) monitored the rice crop status
during the growing season using LAI at Ebro Delta in
Spain. These researchers estimated LAI directly by
measuring the leaf blade of the rice crop with a LI-300
Area Meter. Even though the direct measurements of
LAI provide more accurate estimation, it is time
consuming and work intensive to use over large
agricultural areas which are rapidly changing over the
time.
In the indirect method, LAI is estimated in terms of
canopy gap fraction or gap size distribution. The hand
held optical instruments such as plant canopy analysers
(LI-COR LAI-2000) are usually used to measure canopy
gap fraction. Liu et al, (2010) has used indirect
measurements of LAI-2000 plant canopy analyzer to
compare the LAI estimates derived from vertical gap
fraction measurements obtained from digital colour
photography over the top of canopy of corn, soybean and
wheat canopies in Eastern Canada. The performance of
indirect methods using hand held instruments can only
provide reasonable estimates if the basic assumptions
such as data is collected at dawn or dusk conditions are
strictly followed (Wilhelm et al., 2000) and this method
is not practical to collect LAI data over large vegetation
areas.
Stroppiana et al, (2006) estimated LAI directly and
indirectly to evaluate the adequacy and the range of
reliability of LAI-2000 estimates for rice in Northern
Italy. Similarly, Liang et al, (2003) took LAI
measurements using non-destructive methods to create an
algorithm for estimating LAI using Advanced Land
Imager (ALI) multi-spectral satellite images and it was
validated using multiple small plots within large crop
fields in the CIA, Australia. However, the direct
comparison was not possible due to geo-location and
registration uncertainties of the images; therefore, the
average LAI value for each field in the CIA was
calculated for the validation of the algorithm.