38, 2012
fier and 100
(IQ). Mixed
) data.
d multisensoral
‘the mean UHI
ayer Perceptron
ie models were
sample of about
in prior model
mal (correlation
).17/0.19 K for
rk) and the
17/0.19 K) data
s (R: 0.27/0.26,
parameters (R:
tainly partly a
predicted mean
quality of the
pect to the low
tter models this
%). This is not
ses contributing
fects are related
temperature in
lirectly to the
ultispectral data
| conditions and
odel calibration.
ral and height
e same sensor.
:d features with
night indicate a
le might not be
are likely to be
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXIX-B8, 2012
XXII ISPRS Congress, 25 August — 01 September 2012, Melbourne, Australia
Parameter set LR NN
N| R MAE RMSE| R MAE RMSE
shs 01.027 024 932 | 026. 0.26 0.33
acp 2| 0.19 024 032 | 0.18 024 0.32
tir 331.074 20.17: 022 | 081 019 023
ndvi 331 0.66 0.19 025 | 070 0.21 02%
ms 198] 0.75 017 022 \ 077 018 023
R».25 711 0.71 3 0.13 023 | 073 0138 025
all 2721 6.79 30.16 021] 0:32 .. 0.15 0.2
Table 3. Results of the spatial empirical models (Linear
Regression and Neuronal Network) of the mean UHI with
different parameter/predictor sets. Correlation coefficient R,
mean absolute error and root mean square error.
Nevertheless, it can be stated, that multisensoral and
multitemporal datasets have some potential for spatiotemporal
modelling of the mean UHI. This underlines the results of
Bechtel and Schmidt, who found strong correlations between
Landsat data and a long-term mean UHI dataset derived from
floristic proxy data (Bechtel and Schmidt, 2011).
The performance of Linear Regression and Neuronal Network
models was rather similar, which might be due to the chosen
standard options for the neuronal network classifier (with only
one hidden layer). First tests with more sophisticated networks
showed better results (for instance R: 0.83, MAE: 0.14 K for tir
with a 20|10|10 node network).
5. CONCLUSIONS
The presented results from Hamburg indicate that multisensoral
and multitemporal data has potential for both, the classification
of Local Climate Zones and the empirical modelling of the
spatial distribution of the UHI.
The classification results show that the data (especially
multitemporal thermal and multitemporal spectral data) are
functional for the purpose and that micro-climatic meaningful
urban structures can be classified from different remote sensing
datasets. Further, it provides some evidence for the relevance of
the Local Climate Zone system from a remote sensing point of
view.
The empirical modelling results also underpin the urban
climatologic relevance of the multitemporal tir und ms data.
Although a certain correlation is obvious, since vegetation and
surface energy balance play important roles in the distinction of
urban climates, these good results with freely available Landsat
data offer the prospect of a wide application. However, further
investigations are needed and the large number and complexity
of the involved processes limits the potential of empirical
models. The incorporation of data from other sensors also
slightly improved the empirical modelling results.
6. REFERENCES
Arnfield, A. J., 2003. Two decades of urban climate research: a
review of turbulence, exchanges of energy and water, and the
urban heat island. International Journal of Climatology, 23(1),
pp. 1-26.
Barsi, J. A., Schott, J. R., Palluconi, F. D., and Hook, S. J.,
2005. Validation of a Web-Based atmospheric correction tool
for single thermal band instruments. Earth Observing Systems
X, Proc. SPIE, 58820F, pp. 1-7.
Bechtel, B., 2011. Multitemporal Landsat data for urban heat
island assessment and classification of local climate zones.
Urban Remote Sensing Event, JURSE, 2011 Joint, pp. 129-132.
doi:10.1109/JURSE.2011.5764736.
Bechtel, B., 2012. Robustness of Annual Cycle Parameters to
characterize the Urban Thermal Landscapes. IEEE Geoscience
and Remote Sensing Letters, doi 10.1109/LGRS.2012.2185034.
Bechtel, B. and Daneke, C., 2012, Classification of local
Climate Zones based on multiple Earth Observation Data. IEEE
Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and
Remote Sensing. doi 10.1109/JSTARS.2012.2189873.
Bechtel, B., Langkamp, T., Ament, F., Bohner, J., Daneke, C.,
Gunzkofer, R., Leitl, B. et al, 2011. Towards an urban
roughness parameterisation using interferometric SAR data
taking the Metropolitan Region of Hamburg as an example.
Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 20(1), pp. 29—37.
Bechtel, B., and Schmidt, K., 2011. Floristic mapping data as a
proxy for the mean urban heat island. Climate Research, 49, pp.
45-58. doi:10.3354/cr01009
Bouckaert, R. R., Frank, E., Hall, M., Kirkby, R., Reutemann,
P. Seewald, A., and Scuse, D., 2009. WEKA manual for
version 3-7-0. University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Disponible en: http://ufpr. dl. sourceforge.
net/project/weka/documentation/3.7. x/WekaManual-3-7-0. pdf.
Burges, C. J. C., 1998. A tutorial on support vector machines
for pattern recognition. Data mining and knowledge discovery,
2(2), pp. 121-167.
Chander, G., Markham, B. L., and Helder, D. L., 2009.
Summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients of
Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+ and EO-1 ALI Sensors. Remote
Sensing of Environment, 113, pp. 893-903.
Eliasson, I, 1992. Infrared thermography and urban
temperature patterns. International Journal of Remote Sensing,
13, pp. 869-879.
Fabrizi, R., De Santis, A., and Gomez, A., 2011. Satellite and
ground-based sensors for the Urban Heat Island analysis in the
city of Madrid. Urban Remote Sensing Event, JURSE, 2011
Joint. doi:10.1109/JURSE.2011.5764791
Frey, C., and Parlow, E., 2009. Geometry effect on the
estimation of band reflectance in an urban area. Theoretical and
Applied Climatology, 96(3), pp. 395—406.
Frey, C., Rigo, G., and Parlow, E., 2007. Urban radiation
balance of two coastal cities in a hot and dry environment.
International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28(12), pp. 2695—
2712.