means. The initial
cans. The process
ccurs or, either a
mum number of
ed images were
and dendrograms
ies in the relevant
ographic systems,
'epetitiveness and
knowledge-based
process is the
ons. Maintaining
edundant regions
der a certain area
bok several steps
ivironment after
Vector features
larger bordering
. Initially a hard
smaller than 0.5
ated. Features up
^w exceptions all
ly small regions
1e open ocean is
influences, some
> a significantly
ean regions with
| to a larger area
as taken not to
and well known
SST Spatial
SST Seasonal
a problem since
ies did not apply.
er is not in itself
ity of regional
itude in the case
hat a region that
heterogeneity is
eous. The degree
n bounds
CSAT Seasonal
SST Spatial
SST Seasonal
kx
Figure Four: Australian West Coast Boundaries
The process used to assess the accuracy of the classification
in this study is as follows: the basic regional mean (ux) and
standard deviations (sx) were calculated using the
individual components used to derive regional boundaries.
The standard deviation image gave a regional indication of
areas that contained a large degree of variability. In order to
gain a clearer pixel-based image of each pixel's association
with its regional deviation, a binning operation was
performed producing three bins classifying pixels into their
relevant deviation (1, 2 and 3 or more) from the regional
mean (e.g. Figure 5). This provided a discreetly contrasted
view of pixels that were further away from the regional
mean character. Some pixels highlighted areas where the
region boundary had been compromised through the ISO
classification process using two components or had been
amalgamated during the class reduction process using
dendrograms. The pixel indicator of deviations from the
regional mean in this form only indicates distribution
characteristic within the classified region. Across the whole
image all pixels that fall into the three or more deviations
have the same value. However, should one want to reassess
particular anomalies of the classification, then there is little
indication of where best to start in order to find some
degree of significance. To counter these problems two
approaches were taken to give a pixel level indicator of its
scale of regional variability over the whole regional scope.
Essentially the desired result required a high score for a
pixel in a high deviation bin in a region with a large
deviation. A pixel close to the region's mean but in a region
with a high deviation still scored high but ranked less. A
region of low deviation and pixels close to the mean were
ranked the lowest.
Error Magaitadei Viros Hatoituce
T.
iit
Figure Five: Local example showing A — Classes; B —
Standardized region pixel deviation magnitude; and C —
pixel deviation magnitude.
DISCUSSION
A comparison of these results with similarly derived
regionalisation — showed that the spatio-temporal
representations have the potential to further inform marine
spatial management regimes. It was also shown that the
delimitation of natural phenomena is feasible and can have
seasonal dynamics represented. This provides a potential
baseline for near real-time boundary assessments and an
addition to adaptive management techniques. Ultimately the
results have shown that there is scope for the improved
incorporation of marine dynamics into marine spatial
management systems.
The methodology presented in this study has provided a
simple framework for the identification and delimitation of
both spatial averages and spatio-temporal trends in single
oceanic properties, namely SST and CSAT. As well as
creating a systematic approach, the componentised nature
provides scope for added complexity and changes to
individual components. This approach reduces major
redundancy issues and need for potentially frequent large
scale redesign, and is far more suitable for a process which
is likely to make advances over the near future. Similar
approaches are being developed in a number of other
scientific fields such as bioregionalisation that may
eventually feed into the overall marine cadastre. The
methodology presented can also utilise other sources of
satellite data (or any raster data) that can be at any number
of spatial resolutions. The key requirements for suitable
results would be a long enough time-series of data and input
datasets to be of equal resolution and extents.
REFERENCES
Cheng, Q., Jing, L. & Panahi, A. (2006) Principal
component analysis with optimum
order sample correlation coefficient for image
enhancement. /nternational
Journal of Remote Sensing, 277, 3387 - 3401.
Eklundh, L. & Singh, A. (1993) A comparative analysis of
standardised and
unstandardised principle components analysis in remote
sensing. /nternational
Journal of Remote Sensing, 14, 1359 - 1370.
Hirosawa, Y., Marsh, S. E. & Lkliman, D. H. (1996)
Application of standardized
principal component analysis to land-cover characterization
using multitemporal
AVHRR data. Remote Sensing of the Environment, 58, 267
- 281.