to generate
nination of
3), who use
ever, some
of the geoid
he southern
e shelf by
| Synthetic
lution and
led to the
ıl elevation
10 positive
1e southern
levation of
je is at its
Therefore,
sk can be
eradicated
id causing
stance were
lower than
and high
eforms and
depicts the
ure 2).
s
the record
D). The
modelled
the initial
is surface
alues were
ea surface
1 modelled
fluence of
remaining
tributed to
nsufficient
(2)
h, is our best estimate of the ideal sea surface. The dominant
influence upon h is from h gawos.
Well documented in spaceborne altimetry literature is the fact
that this reference level cannot be directly used as a surface
from which an absolute measure of sea ice freeboard can be
made. Although this holds true in the study region, we use the
relative values as a basis to de-trend the elevation bias. The
hezey values are dominated by thin firstyear (FY) ice and open
water. The modelled EGM2008 mean deviation from hg; gy with
inclusion of tidal variation is 1.81 m, over representing mean
sea level.
-77.8 -77,6 77.4 „77.2 „77.0
Latitude (degrees)
Figure 3. Repeat track of ICESat track 381 across McMurdo
Sound. 9 tracks are present in the repeat with 5 covering the full
length of the study area. All five tracks exhibit an unexpected
positive deviation in h at the northern end of the profile.
The following steps of the method rely on the fact that the
lowest elevation retrieval that can possibly be retrieved by
ICESat is the sea surface, and that the sea surface is visible
somewhere along the satellite track. The elevation profile h
must therefore be sampled for its lowest elevation retrievals.
The sea surface height (SSH) is artificially generated from the
lowest 5 % of elevation measurements along each track. The
selection of a percentage value for this purpose is case
dependent. Zwally et al. (2008) used a 2 % value and reported
that an optimised value will be presented as our knowledge of
the distribution of leads in the Southern Ocean improves. 5 %
has been selected here as the amount of data along-track was
less than available in large basin-scale assessments. This
permits tracks with minimal elevation retrievals to be kept
rather than discarded if only a limited number of points are
available. This methodology filters out any tracks which are
unable to produce at least 3 lowest elevation retrievals i.e.
tracks that have less than 60 individual elevation retrievals.
Furthermore, unlike previous methodologies, the site specific
requirements resulted in no segmentation of the groundtrack
with regard to a running mean and computation of relative
elevations. It was known that the southern end of the elevation
profiles were ice covered areas, therefore splitting the
groundtrack for further improvement on residual geoid errors
and the influence of DOT and tide would result in
underestimated freeboards. Open water was only expected in
the northern and central areas of the study area and therefore
each individual track was not segregated but treated as one.
The lowest 5 % elevation retrievals are then averaged, this value
(hg) is then subtracted from h giving a freeboard (Fb) value:
Fb- h-h, (3)
This is shown schematically in Figure 4.
a6
i RUE i ub i Das
3*3 TIS TT TRÉ MWR 755
Lana deus)
Figure 4. Near coincident ICESat altimetry/reflectivity (T =
16/11/2003 0900), Envisat ASAR (T -17 hours) and MODIS (T
+5.5 hours) imagery. Black dots are shot locations. Metres axis,
Fb (red), h (grey) and h, (blue)
3. RESULTS
From 2003-2009 the McMurdo Sound area (Figure 1) hosted
two sea ice types. A MY sea ice area persisted in the southern
portion of the Sound, fast to the McMurdo Ice shelf in the
south, Hutt Peninsula in the east and the Antarctic continental
coast in the west. A variable FY sea ice cover existed to the
north and covered the remainder of the study area. The area was
assessed during Austral Spring, during the months of
September, October and November making seven annual
investigations of sea ice freeboard from 2003 through 2009. The
study area was assessed holistically (Table 1 and Figure 5), and
for MY and FY alone (Figure 6).