d multiyear
ınd for
03 Envisat
=0.4m.
|. Advanced
js used to
SAR Wide
ites that the
ase in area
a ice up the
season into
)03 by 254
jerienced a
extent for
) Sound.
November
to remove
r to surface
field sites
wo ICESat
ements are
| tracks by
about one month. Taking the mean of the 10 nearest ICESat
shots to the field sites, the methodology performs well. Track 15
(mean value of 0.22 +/-0.1 m) corresponds well to the ground
measurement (0.23 m). Track 9 (mean value of 0.47 +/-0.07 m)
shows larger deviations to the ground measurement (0.22 m).
Probability Density Functions (PDFs) from ICESat and the HL
flights show good overall agreement. Two peaks in the
histogram are seen as FY and MY sea ice. ICESat exaggerates
the FB of FY ice when compared to the HL. This is likely
attributed to h being too low in the southern area of the Sound.
TFT TEN ENT
PDF (1/mi
AN
m
nl
“0.0.05 1.0 15 20 0
Figure 9. Statistics for ICESat (red) and HL (black) freeboards.
4. DISCUSSION
This initial analysis shows the applicability of ICESat derived
freeboard information to small scale assessment of areas of
particular interest.
The degree of the method's accuracy is dependent upon
successful identification of water as the lowest 5 % elevation
retrievals and minimised interference from remaining errors
from unaccounted variables. This methodology in small
geographical areas becomes a play off between data availability
to create statistics and the magnitude of error. A positive trend
between ellipsoid and geoid is seen toward the northern end of
the profiles in h (Figure 3). The satellite repeat pass data
indicates this is likely attributed to residual errors in the
modelled geoid. Such deviations will need to be considered in
any freeboard determination.
It is known that permanent MY ice was in existence at all times
in the southern part of the Sound. During certain years,
especially 2005, MY covered all the western areas of the Sound
meaning no sea surface was visible along the groundtrack of the
satellite. This has resulted in significant underestimation of sea
ice freeboard along these groundtracks. Such a situation
exemplifies the need for special care when applying the
described methodology. Using a running mean to remove any
residual geoid error, tidal influence and DOT (as used by
Zwally et al. 2008 and Yi et al. 2011) was not used in this
study. In this smaller spatial scale assessment its influence
causes artefacts in measurements at differing ice type
boundaries.
Scattering of the laser beam by clouds may introduce an
elevation error which results in the sea surface appearing lower
(Zwally et al. 2008). Gain corrections have not been applied at
the time of writing. Furthermore, reflections from clouds do not
permit the use of laser reflectivity alone for ice-water
discrimination. We have shown in one example (Figure 4) that
additional methods like imagery need to be used in support of
laser reflectivity.
Data availability decreased through the study period with 2009
having only 21 % of data available compared to 2003.
Interannual comparison of freeboard is therefore slightly
hindered.
The final stage of conversion to thickness is highly influenced
by snow depth. This step will be taken when a better knowledge
of snow distribution across the Sound is gained. This is a
further work in progress. The ground measurements reveal the
complexities associated with snow cover. With track 9 the miss
match is likely due to the size of the ICESat footprint (70 m) in
comparison to the mean snow depth taken (0.03 m) over an area
only 20 m in diameter. Snow is observed to be deeper in the
east than in the west. The western ICESat groundtracks (like
track 15) are more likely recording the actual sea ice freeboard.
In the east (e.g. track 9), snow depths across the ICESat
footprint may have been larger. Furthermore, intervening
snowfall between measurements may be the source of the
freeboard difference at cross-over points. This is only
speculation and therefore errors in the methodology may also
account for the disagreement in measurements.
The extent of MY ice is assumed to be closely related to the
passage of the iceberg B-15A across McMurdo Sound (Arrigo
et al. 2002) from mid 2002 to mid 2005. The drastic reduction
in MY sea ice freeboard recorded by ICESat during 2005 is
likely a result of this. The new MY ice with significantly
smaller freeboard than the older MY ice to the south introduced
a bias towards overall lower mean freeboard values.
The southern areas of the region have also been identified as
harbouring sub-ice platelets, a component of the sea ice system
occurring near ice shelves (Leonard et al. 2006). Subsequent
investigation has revealed that the this sub ice layer is
influential on sea ice growth rates (Purdie et al. 2006). It is
possible that this interaction between the solid sea ice and the
sub-ice platelet layer alters the freeboard. Further investigation
is required to quantify this effect. This is especially important in
Antarctica, where the outflow of cold ice-shelf water favours
the formation of the sub-ice platelet layer.
5. CONCLUSIONS
This preliminary investigation provides the first time series of
satellite derived sea-ice freeboard in the western Ross Sea.
Using a combination of ICESat elevation data and auxiliary
satellite imagery this investigation reveals evidence of steadily
increasing freeboard heights of MY sea ice in McMurdo Sound
for the period 2003-2009. No significant trends in freeboard
were detected for FY sea ice. For localized areas the satellite
derived freeboard height shows reasonable agreement with
ground measurements. Freeboard and sea ice extent appear to
be sensitive to local drivers of oceanic change including iceberg
passages. Further work is needed to quantify the role of other
drivers such as the sub-ice platelet layer in the region. From
here, further methods including the analysis of local tide
information to determine ICESat derived freeboard will provide
an alternative data set for comparison. Errors associated with
freeboard and snow depth estimation from satellite remote
sensing platforms mean that in situ information is crucial in the
development and validation of retrieval methodologies.