Full text: Technical Commission VIII (B8)

   
  
    
    
    
  
   
  
    
   
   
    
   
   
    
   
     
    
  
   
    
   
    
  
  
   
   
   
  
  
   
   
  
    
     
   
   
    
  
  
   
    
   
   
   
  
   
   
   
   
   
  
  
  
   
   
   
   
  
   
     
   
ie XXXIX-B8, 2012 
1 reasons is that the street 
ninistrative units and also 
'hich lead the merging to 
formation from satellite 
1 remote sensing images 
cement for decades. It is 
note sensing can produce 
actitioners demands and 
scussion on how damage 
Consequently, previous 
ndo et al. 2006, Vu and 
parison with the ‘ground 
are simply crosschecked 
wed that as Figures 4, 5 
onably matched with the 
cts, more likely to be 
Visually, the old house 
listinguishable from the 
tough for an automated 
he occlusion by the trees 
oÜn line between 2 objects 
ntitative assessment will 
le form with disaster 
  
tomated recognition 
ON 
as been introduced to 
it the early stage after a 
serve as part of a system 
while its ultimate goal is 
solution for multi-type 
nses and to distribute for 
vith QuickBird image of 
luced a reasonably good 
ed the highly suspected 
sed boundaries for fine 
sing designed as a semi- 
ore the damage areas in 
ollapsed buildings. The 
vels would enable the 
dex. The solution was 
mentation, and detailed 
1 be reported in next 
able platform of various 
ion will be considered 
d grid platform. It is 
method for accuracy 
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXIX-B8, 2012 
XXII ISPRS Congress, 25 August — 01 September 2012, Melbourne, Australia 
assessment dealing with objects and in the context of damage 
mapping. 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 
This study is a part of internationally collaborative research 
project supported by Industrial Technology Research Grant 
Program (Project ID: 08E52010a) from New Energy and 
Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO), 
Japan. The author acknowledges the financial support of the 
Faculty of Science conference grant, University of Nottingham, 
Malaysia campus. 
REFERENCES 
Adams, B.J., Huyck, C.K., Mansouri, B., Eguchi, R.T. and 
Shinozuka, M., 2004. Application of high-resolution optical 
Satellite imagery for post-earthquake damage assessment: The 
2003 Boumerdeas (Algeria and Bam (Iran) earthquakes. 
Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research 
Progress and Accomplishments 2003-2004, University of 
Buffalo. http://mceer.buffalo.edu/publications/resaccom/04- 
SP01/12 Eguchi.pdf (20 December 2007). 
Balz, T. and Liao, M.S., 2010. Building damage detection using 
post-seismic high resolution SAR satellite data. International 
Journal of Remote Sensing, 31(13), pp. 3369-339]. 
Bogaert, J., Rousseau, R., Hecke, P. V., and Impens, I., 2000. 
Alternative area-perimeter ratios for measurement of 2D shape 
compactness of habitats. Applied Mathematics and 
Computation, 111(1), pp. 71-85. 
Bevington, J., Adams, B.J. and Eguchi, J., 2010. GEO-CAN 
Debuts to Map Haiti Damage. Imaging Notes, 25(2), 
http://www.imagingnotes.com/go/article.php?mp id-208 
Blaschke T., 2010. Object based image analysis for remote 
sensing. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote 
Sensing, 65, pp. 2-16. 
Chesnel, A-L., Binet, R., and Wald, L., 2007. Quantitative 
Assessment of Building Damage in Urban Areas using Very 
High Resolution Images. In: Proceedings of Urban Remote 
Sensing 2007, 11-13 April 2007, Paris, France. 
Ehrlich, D., Guo, H. D., Molch, K., Ma, J. W., Pesaresi, M., 
2009. Identifying damage caused by the 2008 Wenchuan 
earthquake from VHR remote sensing data. International 
Journal of Digital Earth, 2, pp. 309-326. 
Goodchild, M. F. and Glennon, J. A, 2010. Crowdsourcing 
geographic information for disaster response: a research 
frontier. International Journal of Digital Earth, 3, pp. 231-241. 
Gusella, L., Adams, B. J., Bitelli, G., Huyck, C.K., & Mognol, 
A., 2005. Object-oriented image understanding and post- 
earthquake damage assessment for the 2003 Bam, Iran, 
earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 21, pp. 8225-8238. 
Kerle, N., 2010. Satellite-based damage mapping following the 
2006 Indonesia earthquake-How accurate was it? International 
Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 12, 
pp. 466-476. 
Koshimura, S., Kayaba S., and Matsuoka M., 2010. Integrated 
approach to assess the impact of tsunami disaster. In: Safety, 
Reliability and Risk of Structures, Infrastructures and 
Engineering Systems, edited by Futura, Frangopol & Sinnozuka, 
Taylor and Francis group, London. 
Matsuoka, M. and Yamazaki, F., 1999. Characteristics of 
satellite images of damaged areas due to the 1995 Kobe 
Earthquake. In: Proceeding of the 2 Conference on the 
Applications of Remote Sensing and GIS for Disaster 
Management, The George Washington University, USA, CD- 
ROM. 
Nock, R. and Nielsen, F., 2004. Statistical Region Merging. 
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine 
Intelligence, 26(11), pp. 1452-1458. 
Nock, R. and Nielsen, F., 2005. Semi-supervised statistical 
region refinement for color image segmentation. Pattern 
Recognition, 38, pp. 835-846. 
Saito, K., Spence, R.J.S., Going, C. and Markus, M., 2004. 
Using high-resolution satellite images for post-earthquake 
building damage assessment: a study following the 26 January 
2001 Gujarat Earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 20, pp. 145-169. 
Stramondo, S., Bignami, C., Chini, M., Pierdicca, N. and 
Tertullaiani, A., 2006. Satellite radar and optical remote sensing 
for earthquake damage detection: results from different case 
studies. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27, pp. 4433— 
4447. 
Vincent, L., 1993. Morphological grayscale reconstruction in 
image analysis: applications and efficient algorithms. IEEE 
Transactions on Image Processing, 2, pp. 176-201 
Vu, T.T., Matsuoka, M., and Yamazaki, F., 2005. Detection and 
animation of damage using very high resolution satellite image 
following the 2003 Bam, Iran, earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 
21, pp. S319-8327. 
Vu, T.T. and Ban, Y., 2010. Context-based damage mapping 
from high-resolution optical satellite images. International 
Journal of Remote Sensing, 31(13), pp. 3411-3425. 
Yarbrough, L.D., Easson, G., and Kuszmaul, J.S., 2005. 
QuickBird 2 Tasselled Cap transform Coefficients: A 
comparison of derivation methods. In: Proceedings of Pecora 
16 - Global Priorities in Land Remote Sensing, October 23-27, 
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.