i 156 -
Chairman Session 15 Oshima (Japan): May I invite the audience to comment on
the subject of National Reports. You are aware that any of the 66 Member
Countries of ISPRS have the right, and I think the obligation, to submit in
four years interval to any Congress of our International Society for Photo-
grammetry and Remote Sensing a report supplying information on the state of
the art and on the development of photogrammetry and remote sensing in that
country including relevant addresses. They differ indeed in the arrangement
of contents and are thus difficult to read. In his paper, Prof.Hothmer pre-
sumes National Reports are hardly ever used and concludes they should be
abandoned, if this is true.
Mr. Glendinning (Australia) : My feeling is we should stimulate to improve
the quality of National Reports to be presented 198^ whilst adopting the
proposal presented by Hothmer. At the Congress 1984 we then can discuss
whether it is justified to continue with this undertaking.
Prof. Badekas (Greece) : My experience so far is that statistical data presented
in National Reports need better explanations to be clearly understandable.
Prof. Hildebrandt (FR Germany) : When looking through some National Reports
I hardly find any information on my particular field, that is remote sensing
for forestry. You may wish to recommend, therefore, that the various disci-
lines of remote sensing be better covered.
President ISPRS Doyle (USA) : Some days ago the Council held a joint meeting
with all Commission Presidents in Toulouse. The meeting accepted the recommen-
dations of Hothmer. I will myself invite all ISPRS Members to present National
Reports at the next Congress 1984 in Rio de Janeiro.
President Com.VI Hothmer (FR Germany): One objective of the meeting in
Toulouse was to allocate appropriate session periods to all seven Commissions.
There will be in total some 125 sessions. The meeting agreed allocating to
Commission VI two exclusive time periods, thus without any other simultaneous
session. Whenever you agree that publishing does not make much sense if
publications are not read, then I think we should devote one of these exclu-
sive sessions to the basic problem of communication.
President Com.VI Hothmer (FR Germany) : Another item might be added which is
related to our assignment of information exchange. I mailed Outline 01.81 to
the Council ISPRS in January 1981 proposing to devote the last scientific
session of the Congress Rio de Janeiro 1984 to the topic of TRENDS. The
reason is that quite a few congressists left the past Congress Hamburg with
big question marks 3
+ The Scientist : Is his field of interest not anymore worthwhile to be
dealt with and should he switch over to, for instance, remote sensing ?
4 The Educator: What part of his lecture became obsolete, and which
achievement is indispensable and must consequently be covered from now on 2
+ The Practitioner : What is the impact of all results of the Congress on
changing his method and instrumentation ?
+ The Employee : What is the significance of the Congress for his professional
Status; will his profession grow or diminish; what updating of knowledge
can he recommend to colleagues ?
+ The Manager : Which invention presented at the Congress will become
operational ?
The next Congress should endeavour to counteract this negative farewell
effect attempting to answer these questions.
Ihemadu 4