From the materials presented, which were
obtained at different revolutions and exposure
time,the following has been ascertained:
maximum opening of each diaphragm may be per-
fectly synchronous. Fig.5.
(‘see tables 1 - 5).
i
ue Registering of the camera syn-
chronization for t - 1/150 com-
paring with the respective non-
synchronization optimized
Fig.4 Registering of camera non-syn-
chronization for different ex-
posure times
TABLE 1
EFFECTIVE CONSTANT EXPOSURES OF THE TWO CAMERAS.
The normol exposure time .t' of the two comeros.
t «1/1$(0.066) t «1/20 (0.023) t = 1/60 (0.047)
v | eu fee EB) € | ecjHHE C | © Je T
0.075 | 0.076 | 0.001 | 15% | 0.038 | 0.041 | 0.003 | 9% | 0.023 | 0.024 | 0.001 | 67
t = 1/125 (0.008) t-1/250 (o t : 1/400 (0.003)
0.012 | 0.014 | 0002 | 25% | 0.008 | 0.009 | 0.001 | 25% | 0.007| 0.006 | 0.001 | 33%
TABLE 2
NON- SYNCHRONIZATION NOTICED AT THE OPENING OF THE TWO GAMERAS DIAPHRAGMS
The normal exposure time ,t'of the two cameras
t-1/15(0.066) t-1/30(0.033) t =1/60 (0.017)
Let] te telo SE ie e en] ox ax Lt te sb] OK at y
0.017 | 0.015 | 0.002| 37 0.005 | 0.006 | 0.001 5% 0.023 | 0.024 | 0.001 5%
t - 4/425 (0.008) t 1/250 (0004) t -1/400 (0.003)
0.044 | 0.017 0.003) 37% 0.016 | 0.014 | 0.002 50% | 0.012 | 0.011 0.001 33%
61