SOME ACCURACY ASPECTS OF ON-THE-JOB
CALIBRATIONS SHOWN AT THE EXAMPLE OF
A PHOTOGRAMMETRIC CONTROL SURVEY
Orhan Altan, Hanspeter Bopp
and
Herbert Krauss
Institut für Anwendungen der Geodásie im Bauwesen
Universität Stuttgart
ABSTRACT
The photogrammetric control survey of a
plastie membrane covering an open-air café
was carried out with a Hasselblad MK 70
camera using five arbitrarily chosen camera
stations and object space control. The data
were processed on one hand with a rigid
bundle solution, on the other hand with the
11-parameter solution, programmed asa two
Step adjustment. The results out of the
orientation and the on-the-job calibration
version of the 11-parameter solution are
compared with the results of the bundle
solution with regard to 5 configurations of
the camera stations and different numbers of
control points.
1. INTRODUCTION
At a college in Ludwigsburg (FRG) a membrane
was erected to cover an open-air café. The
plastic membrane is supported by five wooden
beams with a parabolic form. The smallest
span width is 7.5 m with a height of 4.0m
of the summit. The beam with the maximum
width of 20.6 m reaches a height of 9.0 m.
The whole membrane covers an area of about
500 m2. Detailed information about the
construction, designed by AIC Stuttgart, can
be found in /1/.
For the final control selected profiles on
the membrane and the coordinates of the
system points had to be determined. Each
of these profiles were represented by about
15 markers which were sticked to the mem-
brane. For this purpose we performed a com-
bined geodetic-photogrammetric survey /4/,
which was analogic to the one we reported
about in /5/.
In contrast to that survey of a cooling
tower we employed a HASSELBLAD MK 70 reseau
31
camera with a 70 mm film (AVIPHOT PAN3OPE,
20 DIN).
The control point configuration and the
position of the five arbitrarily chosen
camera stations is given in Figure 2.
160
Evene No PO
gg VANE 3.8 N-----EN Ce
Figure 1: Photograph taken from
camera station 1
14
12
016
20 © oV
control points
910
A AS A! A?
y
camera stations
a3
X
p
30m
Figure 2: Situation of camera stations
and control points