beck Jaemgaem y. TEX Block Husum 
x nT Y x x 
x x y y 
Y x 2v * 5x yj x ; yo: ; 3 x ; 
x tar} y : y y l a } 
ds uu y y y Y y ili y hs a 7 yg Pf 
x 
1. t y x x 
1 y 
Y P x 
# Y 
phoio number dilference holo numer difference A. 
5 10 1$ m 5 19 15 ^us 
£3 E. wm . 
fig. 5: Jaemijaervi Husum 
normed cross covariance for distances up to 1 cm as function of 
the difference of the photo numbers 
The reduction of the cross covariance for distances up to 1 cm (fig. 5) 
with growing photo number differences is only small. In the block Jaemi- 
jaervi there is no difference between the direct neighboured photos and 
photos with photo number differences of 19 - for both the mean of cx and 
Cy reaches 0.65, but in the case of the block Husum the mean of cx and 
cy is reduced from 0.83 to 0.53. The reduction can be seen very clear at 
the cross covariance of the residuals with photo number differences larger 
19. This mean value is in both blocks identical to 0.17. 
The normed cross covariance functions of the blocks Eggebeck and Koenigs- 
huegel are similar but for Hordorf 1 and Hordorf 34 the value for distances 
up to 1 cm reaches only 0.45 and 0.32. In the case of Willunga and 
Schwienkuhlen, this effect was not existing. For both blocks reseau 
cameras have been used. 
da i 
le - fig. 8 normed covariance / cross covariance y - component 
124 : block Hordorf 34 
3$ 
.32 1 AUR. Pr WN z + 3 1 5 
2.38 ——— 342 cmm cA je m num cm A aa | à Cu rar <img teats) ese] see | sm) 
-. 4? i 2 Vd --—--7 Ti 2 T + 3 a3 à 3 
- de ^ 3 . 
2.34 E à L 1 
2.2. $ 1 
MIT 1 
ern point distance [cm] 
  
& 18 7.5 Jah 8.3 8.3 MS F.A 2.9. 3.9 14,8 11,5 12,8 14143 18,9 19,5 180.9% 17.3 18:3 19.5 
2: 4 fig. 7 normed covariance / cross covariance 
block Schwienkuhlen 
o 
« . 
o o 
> 
  
à 
Go 
+ 
Cd 3.44 61.1534 
^" «. * « " e ww» 
m 
Di 
me 
E 
3 
© 
DT