Full text: 16th ISPRS Congress (Part B1)

registration of a drift angle of 10°; this is due to the row 
geometry and the dimensions of the lens. Problems in ascertain- 
ing the MAD minimum arise if disturbing factors prevent the 
formation of a function "trough" and the MAD function dege- 
nerates into an inclined strairht line. In that case the al- 
gorithm finds a minimum at the boundary, which of course has 
to be discarded. 
MEASURES TO ELEMINATE DISTURBANCE 
Prom the previous passages it is evident that the state vari- 
bles n and ,u are subjected to a variety of disturbing influ- 
ences. It sÜegestc ltself, therefore, that the values ascer- 
tained should be filtered before feeding them to the control 
elements, Since it is posable to define a linear, though simple, 
model of the aircraft’s motion, to classify the disturbances 
with regard to their points of attack and to estimate their 
standard deviations, an optimum linear filter (KALMAN filter) 
can be devised, if we assume independence between state vari- 
ables and disturbances as well as independence of the distur- 
bances from each other. Such a filter has a number of advanta- 
ges which will be explained later. 
The signal generation model corresponds to the system equa- 
tions of the system "aireraft-camera", with n(t) being the 
only state variable present. If we assume that in flight along 
a route at a constant height and with preset wind correction 
angle and speed, n(t) must be constant, then changes of n(t) 
can exclusively caused by disturbances (turbulences, thermal 
currents, cross-wind swaying). Hence, we arrive at a very 
simple motion equation: 
n(t) » b. f (t) (3) 
where f (t) stands for system noise, which may be assumed to 
be white noise. Further, the observation equation of the pro- 
cess has to be formulated: 
Y3 = ny + N, (4) 
in which N. designates discretey white disturbances of the 
measurements with a Gaussian distribution, and y. stands for 
the n(t) values observed, i.e. obtained by the measuring 
procedure described above. From the above assumptions, the 
standard deviations of the disturbing signals can be stated 
to be 
Bhf (6) fls1sY = B= 125 = 8) (5) 
E(N,N,) = 5, 9433) (6) 
with 6" desicnating Kronecker's delta. 
131 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.