author in this journal. |
Obviously, in practical cases there is not the nice
consistent 3 * 3 pattern of image points of Figure 2, but
a less repeatable arrangement.
| ABS'
| The
| equ:
| so
| stu
rectangular meshes, and assume a constant image | pur]
inc
deformation within every mesh. mod
com
all
par
In these cases we can segment the image into a grid of
Differences are then formed between the image points in REV
corresponding meshes. In the presence of "empty" meshes,
that are meshes without measured points, we form
differences to the next, nearest meash containing image
points. sol
Cau:
| equ
seq
int
gen
dif
to
Reference:
| |
Kubik, K (1971); "Systematic Image Errors in Block | Cem
Triangulation"; ITC Publications, Series A number 49, 22 eff
pp and 119 fig. | alg
Kubik, K (1972); co-authors: E R Bosman, E Clerici and.D
Eckhart, "Systematic Image Errors in Aerial Triangulation,
A Review"; Invited paper, proceedings congress of the
International Society for Photogrammetry, Comm III;
Photogrammetria 29; pp 113-131.
hav
to
pos
sui
to
are
per
Sys
Kubik, K (1985); co-authors: P Frederiksen, W Weng, "Ah,
Robust Estimation"; The Australian Journal of Geodesy,
Photogrammetry and Surveying, No 42, pp 19-32.
Kubik, K (1988): "A Note on Photogrammetric Adjustment (O(
with Additional Parameters"; Photogrammetric Engineering. |
Kübik, K (1988); co-authors: K lyons, D Merchant,
"Photogrammetric Work without Blunders"; Photogrammetric
Engineering
100