sed
| of
in-
(2)
of
the
ess
ble
cal
res
le.
cu-
ra
ca-
ble
ent
ing
ca-
ch.
in
sed
ly
on,
ful
lan
1es
not
ion
ind
del
IX
/as
ge
all
roads, different kinds of vegetation, and a water area
(small pond). For the scale space approach, 512 by
512, 1024 by 1024, and 4096 by 4096 images were
used.
4.2 Texture Energy Features
All fifteen micro-texture images were created in
coarse level. Then, each image was evaluated to
select suitable filters. In fact, computational methods
were not involved to select filters. Based on visual
evaluation of the micro- and macro-texture features,
ESES, E5S5, SSES, and S5SS filters were chosen.
Any micro-filters which did not provide clear texture
patterns were not used in further levels. Selected
filters were used through the next two levels. Macro-
texture features were obtained with different macro-
window sizes for each level. Macro-filter sizes select-
ed for each level were 5, 15, and 31 for 512 by 512,
1024 by 1024, and 4096 by 4096 images, respectively.
The micro-filters selected in this study provided a
similar pattern of texture energy features. The filters
seems to detect horizontal, vertical and diagonal
patterns of texture. It is obvious that micro-texture
patterns will disappear by use of larger macro-window
size. However, more homogeneous macro-textures
will appear. Grouping of the micro-textures provided
macro-texture.
4.3 Integration of Texture Feature Plates
and Classification
Each texture feature plate is regarded as a spectral
band to apply multispectral analysis. The texture
feature plates are combined to one image file with
BIL (band interleaved by line) format. Iterative self-
organizing data analysis technique (ISODATA) in
ERDAS was used for classification. The advantage of
ISODATA is that the algorithm represents a fairly
comprehensive set of additional heuristic procedures
which have been incorporated into an interactive
scheme (Tou and Gonzalez, 1974). Classification was
performed through all three resolution levels. Figures
3, 4, and 5 are the results of classification for each
level. The boundaries of both original and classified
texture images were detected by using a Sobel edge
operator (Figure 2 and 6).
The classification results were improved from coarse
level to fine level. Classification result of fine level
renders original image. However, the feature
boundaries were not preserved due to the relatively
large macro-window size. More boundaries were
obtained from texture classification by comparing to
the boundaries of the original image, especially in
residential and vegetation areas. This result is possi-
ble, because in those areas different texture patterns
197
are mixed. The result still shows lots of micro-
textures which are reasonable to be grouped into a
homogeneous area.
Optimal size of macro-window depends on scale,
resolution, and objects in the image. To find optimal
size of the window size is not easy. In addition, other
very crucial factor for texture analysis is the
classification method.
5. CONCLUSIONS
Laws' texture energy transform provides information
about texture patterns of the surface. His approach to
detect micro-texture and then group into a macro-
texture feature is very realistic and a proper approach.
However, to determine the fixed macro-window size
for entire image is a difficult task. It is not easy to
develop the dynamic size of the window, ie., the
window size varies depending on the objects in the
image.
So far, many of the texture analysis methods do not
succeed for natural scene imagery. Most of authors
have used synthetic image or geometrical composite
(or mosaic) of natural texture image patches to devel-
op and evaluate texture operators. However, these
kinds of imagery do not provide enough texture
properties of natural scene.
Since color imagery contains more information than a
monochrome one, to use color image is one way to
improve the texture analysis system.
Finally, the 3D object space approach of texture
analysis is probably a more interesting and more
powerful solution.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Funding for this research was provided in part by the
NASA Center for Commercial Development of Space
Component of the Center for Mapping at The Ohio
State University.
REFERENCES
Ballard, D. and C. Brown, 1982. Computer Vision.
Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., pp. 166-
194.
Laws, K., 1980. Textured image segmentation. Ph.D.
dissertation, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Universi-
ty of Southern California.
Gong, X. and N. Huang, 1988. Texture segmentation
using iterative estimate of energy states. Oth Int.
Conference on Pattern Recognition, Rome-Italy,
EDEN
|
|
|
|