Table 1.
Matrix Dimensions
(1) (2) ACross-Strip Ordering (->S) Down-Strip Ordering (*G)
p$ q% q m
pO? y UO p.1. ? D W Fl:
60 20% s(g-1) 5sg-8s 2(s) s+2 (g-2) (s-1) (s-2) 2(g-1) gti: (5-1) (9-2) (g-3)
-3g+5 sé(g-1) s2(g-1)
60 60 s(g-1). 8sg-13s 2(s) s+3 (g-2) (s-2) (s-3) 3(g-1) 2g (28-3) (8-2) (g-3)
-9g415 sS*! 2(-1.3) © 2(g-1.3)
60 60 2sg- 32sg-46s 5s-3 4s (79-11) (s-2) (s-3) 5g-3 dg (78-711) (9-2) (973)
(+C) (s*g) -46g+66 s<g s2g
80 20 S(g-2) 8sg-25s 3(s) 2942 (29-7) (s-1) (s-2) 2(g-2) gti (s-1) (g-4) (g-5)
-5g416 s$0.5(g-1.5) s20.5(g-1.5)
80 60 2s(g-1) 55sg-151s 5(2s-1) 8s-3 (109-22) (s-2) (s-3) 5g-6 4g-1 (7s-11) (g-4Xg-5)
{(+C) -g -80g+218 *(g-5) (4s?-13s413) „5g
(+51) P 59: 1425/5)
80 60 s(g-2) 13sg-41s 3(s) 2s+3 (2g-7) (s-2) (s-3) 3(g-2) 2d-1. (28-3) (g-4) (g-5)
-15g+48 sé (g-2) s2(g-2)
80 80 s(g-2) 23sg-73s 3(s) 2s+5 (2g-7) (s-4) (s-5) 5 (g-2) 4g-5 (4s-10) (g-4) (g-5)
-50g+160 sÉX 29-5) 2g-5)
(1) Dimension of M in terms of basic matrix m.
m, taking b as a unit.
(2) No. of basic matrices.
(4) Width of band in terms of m, taking m as a unit.
(3) Width of band in terms of
(5) No. of fill-in in terms
Irregularity in networks could take place due to
deviationof some flight parameters from the design-
ed ideal, or some irregularity in the boundary of
the photographed object.
7.1 Shift of models in adjacent strips
This is a very common phenomenon in aerial
‚of m. (6) Q, ® approximate relationship.
Table 2. Numerical Example
Ord. (7S) Ord. (-G)
ps q$ s m $- TW TD S m X TW TD
g FI: mtP.I. (+3) * (+) ROG. (+8) (+%)
60 20 4 381 513 552 736 12 365 695 756 1176
24 132 (7.6) (43.5) 8 330 (8.8) (69.2)
60 60 6 873 1137 1424 1656 22 1065 2295 2688 3528
24 264 (25.2) (45.6) 8 1230 (17.1) (53.7)
60 60 6 3294 5178 6192 6966 22 4318 8608 10304 11914
(+C)| 24 1884 (10.3) (400) 8 4290 (19.7) (38.4)
80 20 4 1104 1590 1680 2016 12 899 1691 1848 2904
44 486 (5.7) (26.8) 13 792 (9.3) (71.7)
80 60 6 2534 3506 3780 4536 22 2669 5621 6050 7986
44 972 (7.8) (29.4) 13 2952 (7.6) (42.1)
80 60 6 10312 18409 21240 (+S1) 25960 22 11586 21882 27387 31683
(+C)| 44 8097 19240 (15.4) (4.10) 13 10296 (25.2) (44.8)
8928 21712 (7892)25960
(12.8) (34.9)
80 80 11 8289 11691 12474 15246 44 9454 21406 22748 26620
44 3402 (6.7) (30.4) 13 11952 (6.3) (24.4)
*% increase over X.
7. IRREGULAR NETWORKS triangulation. It happens due to the inability
during the flight to adjust the position of one
photograph, or more, in a strip to exactly match
the position of corresponding photograph in an
adjacent strip (figure 13).
The result is a shift
in the area of the triple lap between two adjacent
strips.
In this case the identification of common
tie points between strips to fall simutaneously in
these areas becomes either difficult or impossible.
This would lead to an intermediate model in one
246
7
L
[=
EL
Figure |
Ordering
