ıLU) | L(3) | L(4)j L(5) | L(6)j L(7) | L(8)|L(9) | Luo),
(s-) |
(s-1)
(s)
(s-)
(s)
(S-1)
(s)
rn)
(Ss).
(s-1) — >52
ts) Figure 10-5 Pattern of M,
p= 80% 997 60% WC).
ts-1)
2)1;29-9)! I(29-7) ! ! (29-5) | (29-3
L(3) | L(4) | L(5) | L(6) | L(7) | ; . ILC);
|unius I
(g-2) 1)
(g-2)
|
|.
IL
(9-2)
(g-2)
(9-2)
(9-2)
(9-2)
(S)
9
(S) -4)
(8) |(— S) |
(s) | |
d
3
Figure 11. Patterns of M,p=q=80% .
If the side lap in this case is increased to 60%,
it would not be possible to construct the cross
models, .as they become incomplete. The same
principles described for homogeneous networks could
be extended to cases of increased p$, q$.
Figure 12. Computer output of pattern of M,p=60%,
q=20%,9=5,s=3 .m=1,F.1z0.
SANT
o 0 o oO oO —œL(k)
9, |92| |93| |94| [9s
f olofoloJoYof[olo][o| =.
Figure 13. Shift of
strips: arrangement of
photographs, tie points
and models,p=60%,
q=20%.
—À LL)
b(k,k) D(k,k+ =
L3) (—- S)
o zd
>= b(k,k)
(——*996) (6)
Figure 14. Sub-block B(x) for shifted strips.
ew eu rrr i à] |
ri] | le —=L (k+1) P 7
el
|!
| €
J
Figure 15. Sub-matrix b(k,k*1) for irregular
boundaries .
248
7.2 Ir:
The irr:
the exi
intenti
cover a
or any :
whereby
are not
them mi
take pl
submatr
structu.
last mo
the joi
the fol
joined ©
B is th
is the
(0 ,Y) g
covaria
on one |
respect
The num
b(k,k+1
illustr
The res
irregul
constru
concept
7.3 Ir
The irr
graphy
are use
result
other m
this ca
(Julia,
particu
by one
strateg
for thi
The est
example
remarks
(1) The
matrix
where t
diagona
perform
(2) The
accompl
of the
This st
by Gaus
(3) The
W would
25%.
(4) If
best ca
matrix
D, with
(5) The
on the
orderin
(6) The
on p$,q
the com
Togethe
manipul
could b
